wpr
  • wpr
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago

Gotta be 16 - 0 right now and out scoring opponents by 40.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



It would be amazing for GB to be 16-0 after playing only 13 games. I'm all for it.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

1-0 after playing only 13 games.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


Quoting to preserve this amazing typo for posterity.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
  • Porforis
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
5 years ago

I don't think it's intentional brakes. I think Rodgers is back to freelancing and our offense looks broke as fuck when he refuses to run it as designed.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



Freelancing how? I hear complaints every year about Rodgers, which are valid here?

HE HOLDS THE BALL TOO LONG AND TAKES UNNECCESARY SACKS - Did that happen this week?

HE CHECKS OUT OF RUNS AND TRIES TO FORCE BALLS DEEP - Sorry, how many deep balls did we chuck? Is 28 passes and 23 runs not pretty balanced? Did we not stick with the run fairly consistently all game long without getting away from it for entire drives?

HE IGNORES THE OPEN RECEIVER - I'm sorry, can you please point out a few plays where someone was clearly open and he didn't get the ball out/forced the ball to someone completely blanketed?

HE DOESN'T RUN THE OFFENSE - This is what it comes down to. You have a feeling, reality must be warped to cover this feeling even if it means having to accept that you personally know more about how the offense is designed to be run, what plays are being called, what the scouting reports say, what interactions are happening between coaches and Rodgers than Rodgers.

The receivers were blanketed all day long. Rodgers was getting the ball out fast when receivers were being given 8+ yards of pad. We checked into run more often than we checked out of it. We didn't force the ball deep on bombs. Most of Rodgers' sacks involved an O Lineman pushed backwards directly into his face within two seconds. Rodgers didn't hold onto the ball for 8+ seconds dancing around trying to wait for someone to get open instead of throwing the ball away.

But nope Rodgers still is to blame and "Isn't running the offense".
wpr
  • wpr
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago

Quoting to preserve this amazing typo for posterity.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Thanks I fixed it on my post. Every time I am a smart ass it bites me in the butt.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

Quoting to preserve this amazing typo for posterity.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I was curious if Wayne missed my smart-ass tone, or if he was trying to one-up my smart-ass tone, or if it was a typo. My brain started to hurt and I walked away.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago

I was curious if Wayne missed my smart-ass tone, or if he was trying to one-up my smart-ass tone, or if it was a typo. My brain started to hurt and I walked away.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I know you are a smart ass. I was trying to ride the crest of smartdom and had a typo. Thing is I knew the was a mistake in my post I just couldn't see it.
It would have worked out better if I would have said that is what I meant to say.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
  • gbguy20
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
5 years ago

Freelancing how? I hear complaints every year about Rodgers, which are valid here?

HE HOLDS THE BALL TOO LONG AND TAKES UNNECCESARY SACKS - Did that happen this week?

HE CHECKS OUT OF RUNS AND TRIES TO FORCE BALLS DEEP - Sorry, how many deep balls did we chuck? Is 28 passes and 23 runs not pretty balanced? Did we not stick with the run fairly consistently all game long without getting away from it for entire drives?

HE IGNORES THE OPEN RECEIVER - I'm sorry, can you please point out a few plays where someone was clearly open and he didn't get the ball out/forced the ball to someone completely blanketed?

HE DOESN'T RUN THE OFFENSE - This is what it comes down to. You have a feeling, reality must be warped to cover this feeling even if it means having to accept that you personally know more about how the offense is designed to be run, what plays are being called, what the scouting reports say, what interactions are happening between coaches and Rodgers than Rodgers.

The receivers were blanketed all day long. Rodgers was getting the ball out fast when receivers were being given 8+ yards of pad. We checked into run more often than we checked out of it. We didn't force the ball deep on bombs. Most of Rodgers' sacks involved an O Lineman pushed backwards directly into his face within two seconds. Rodgers didn't hold onto the ball for 8+ seconds dancing around trying to wait for someone to get open instead of throwing the ball away.

But nope Rodgers still is to blame and "Isn't running the offense".

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



Just so we're clear, everything you just asked for is exactly what Barfan was crucified/suspended/run off this forum for doing.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
go.pack.go.
5 years ago

Freelancing how? I hear complaints every year about Rodgers, which are valid here?

HE HOLDS THE BALL TOO LONG AND TAKES UNNECCESARY SACKS - Did that happen this week?

HE CHECKS OUT OF RUNS AND TRIES TO FORCE BALLS DEEP - Sorry, how many deep balls did we chuck? Is 28 passes and 23 runs not pretty balanced? Did we not stick with the run fairly consistently all game long without getting away from it for entire drives?

HE IGNORES THE OPEN RECEIVER - I'm sorry, can you please point out a few plays where someone was clearly open and he didn't get the ball out/forced the ball to someone completely blanketed?

HE DOESN'T RUN THE OFFENSE - This is what it comes down to. You have a feeling, reality must be warped to cover this feeling even if it means having to accept that you personally know more about how the offense is designed to be run, what plays are being called, what the scouting reports say, what interactions are happening between coaches and Rodgers than Rodgers.

The receivers were blanketed all day long. Rodgers was getting the ball out fast when receivers were being given 8+ yards of pad. We checked into run more often than we checked out of it. We didn't force the ball deep on bombs. Most of Rodgers' sacks involved an O Lineman pushed backwards directly into his face within two seconds. Rodgers didn't hold onto the ball for 8+ seconds dancing around trying to wait for someone to get open instead of throwing the ball away.

But nope Rodgers still is to blame and "Isn't running the offense".

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



You speak the truth here. It’s always Rodgers’ fault though, don’t you know that? Our receivers are the best in the NFL and our QB can’t hit them to save his life.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

You speak the truth here. It’s always Rodgers’ fault though, don’t you know that? Our receivers are the best in the NFL and our QB can’t hit them to save his life.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



Whoa, whoa! Our WR's are far from the best. That's some foolish level hyperbole there. We have 1 WR that could be argued into the top 10. The rest are basically edge WR3's or solid WR4's.

Going into this game, the Packers OL was the only one to not give up a sack in under 2.5 seconds. What value does that have? I have no idea, but I remember the previous coach having a 3 second clock in training camp and the goal was to have the ball out before the timer expired.


UserPostedImage
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago
I THINK go pack go was being sarcastic.
At least I THINK he was....
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

I THINK go pack go was being sarcastic.
At least I THINK he was....

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 


😝
UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

Thing is I knew the was a mistake in my post I just couldn't see it.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


Ah, the irony is both rich and delicious! 🤣

I know exactly what you mean, though. I can be positive there is an error in an email or text message I'm writing and be simply unable to find it no matter how hard I look, yet I can be randomly thumbing through a thousand-page tome and a missing comma will leap off the page at me.

Occasionally, I'll find typos in things I wrote a decade ago, and it makes me cringe and grind my teeth in shame.
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
5 years ago

I THINK go pack go was being sarcastic.
At least I THINK he was....

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Yes, 100% sarcastic.

And that stat about the Packers OL not allowing a sack in the first 2 seconds or whatever...that’s great. How much of that has Rodgers also contributed to helping with that stat? With his ability to escape pressure & move in the pocket that many here seem to criticize him for...

Don’t get me wrong, sometimes Rodgers does hold the ball too long. But last year he was criticized for all of his throw-aways. This year he’s criticized for holding it too long & taking sacks. He can’t win for losing with some people. Common denominator? Our shitty receivers not getting open.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago
Nonstop.....if the comma was missing, how could it leap off the page at you?😂
I had one leap off the page at me once, and it hit me right in the 👃.😂
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

Freelancing how? I hear complaints every year about Rodgers, which are valid here?

HE HOLDS THE BALL TOO LONG AND TAKES UNNECCESARY SACKS - Did that happen this week?

HE CHECKS OUT OF RUNS AND TRIES TO FORCE BALLS DEEP - Sorry, how many deep balls did we chuck? Is 28 passes and 23 runs not pretty balanced? Did we not stick with the run fairly consistently all game long without getting away from it for entire drives?

HE IGNORES THE OPEN RECEIVER - I'm sorry, can you please point out a few plays where someone was clearly open and he didn't get the ball out/forced the ball to someone completely blanketed?

HE DOESN'T RUN THE OFFENSE - This is what it comes down to. You have a feeling, reality must be warped to cover this feeling even if it means having to accept that you personally know more about how the offense is designed to be run, what plays are being called, what the scouting reports say, what interactions are happening between coaches and Rodgers than Rodgers.

The receivers were blanketed all day long. Rodgers was getting the ball out fast when receivers were being given 8+ yards of pad. We checked into run more often than we checked out of it. We didn't force the ball deep on bombs. Most of Rodgers' sacks involved an O Lineman pushed backwards directly into his face within two seconds. Rodgers didn't hold onto the ball for 8+ seconds dancing around trying to wait for someone to get open instead of throwing the ball away.

But nope Rodgers still is to blame and "Isn't running the offense".

Originally Posted by: Porforis 







UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
5 years ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



The checkdown was only there if he would’ve thrown it at the beginning of the play. By the time the routes developed & nobody was open, there was no real good option for a check down.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    beast (1m) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
    Zero2Cool (5h) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
    Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
    dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
    Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
    Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
    packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
    Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
    Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
    Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
    Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
    dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
    Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
    dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
    Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
    Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
    Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
    Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
    Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
    Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
    dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
    dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
    wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
    Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
    Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
    Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
    Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
    beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
    Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
    Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
    Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

    1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.