wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago

Yeah....the Lions played SOOOO great! 5 field goals.....not touchdowns.
Plus as was shown, the first hands to the face was verified.
I understand Sanders though. All his years wasted...I mean, playing for the lowly Lions. He wants to see them win SOMETHING while he’s still alive.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



I used to feel this way but as I watch games you just don't see a receiver who is going to break away from the defender when the defender close enough for a PI penalty in order to prevent a big play. They do happen but it's not typical.

Do defenders grab the receiver? Yes all the time. Is it 20, 30 or 40 yards down field? No it's within 10-15 yards of the LOS. That's where the double moves come in. Is there PI 20,30 yards down field? Yes but the defender has to be within an arms length of the receiver to PI. I am ok with DPI being a 5 or 10 yards penalty and automatic 1st down.

I guess we can look to the college game as a reference. I don't watch many college games but I don't see the abuse you are concerned about being a major issue.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
5 years ago
One Packers fan, a Yooper from Iron Mountain Michigan, didn't fare so well when he was in Green Bay for the Loins game.
He was refused service in the 1919 because he was too inebriated at which time he started verbally assaulted staff.
They called the Police and when they arrived he physically assaulted the police officers trying to bite one on the leg.
When they got him in the squad car he kept banging his head against the plexiglass screen between the seats.
I think this particular Yooper should move to Philadelphia.😂
Porforis
5 years ago

Stop assessing the spot foul and start imposing a 15-yard (or better yet, 10-yard) penalty for defensive pass interference, and the need for challenges disappears instantly.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Except people are still screaming bloody murder over this game and asking for rule changes, over a 5 yard + first down penalty. Swap those hands to the face with DPI @ 10 yard penalties and you'd still have people screaming for review.

I'm not so much saying that challenges for PI is a good idea, as I'm saying that no matter what you do people will be screaming and complaining and asking for reviews for everything under the sun. IMO, the NFL should ignore them all.
Cheesey
5 years ago
True.
Fact is, you could probably find something to penalize every play.
In trying to appease the whiners, it has made it almost impossible for the refs to do their jobs.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
5 years ago

One Packers fan, a Yooper from Iron Mountain Michigan, didn't fare so well when he was in Green Bay for the Loins game.
He was refused service in the 1919 because he was too inebriated at which time he started verbally assaulted staff.
They called the Police and when they arrived he physically assaulted the police officers trying to bite one on the leg.
When they got him in the squad car he kept banging his head against the plexiglass screen between the seats.
I think this particular Yooper should move to Philadelphia.😂

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 


How do you know all this, Yoop?
A relative or friend of yours???🤣

UserPostedImage
warhawk
5 years ago
I don't have any sympathy for the Lions.
Teams that go 3-0 on the turnovers win 91% of the time. The Lions only managed 9 points on the 3 turnovers. This doesn't even include them catching our guys totally off guard on the first play of the game and not getting in the end zone then either.
In the last 55 minutes of the game Detroit only gained 167 yards. Our D stuffed their run (kudos to Lowry) and our pass rush really started to pressure Stafford.

So they complain about penalties being the reason they lost? I don't think so. The league really needs to look at the rules and make it easier to determine a foul in real time. What difference should it make if the DL has his hand on the face mask pushing the OL's head back or if it's a fist to the throat that does the same thing? Another way to put it how is an OL supposed to block a DL he cannot see because his head's shoved back looking at the sky? Besides, the 2nd one was on the DL. He got called the first time and should have taken that as being put on notice. He went back there anyway so that one was on him.







"The train is leaving the station."
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

I guess we can look to the college game as a reference. I don't watch many college games but I don't see the abuse you are concerned about being a major issue.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


My point precisely. I thought I made it in my original post, but apparently I failed to type it out. I don't think there's any evidence that DBs in the college game mug receivers all the way down the field, so I'm skeptical of the notion that it would become a major problem in the NFL. The offense would score at will if the defense was giving up automatic first downs like that.

When it comes to enforcing the rules of the game, I like the analogy of cops enforcing speed limits: They have every right to pull you over and give you a ticket for going a mile per hour over the posted limit, but the overwhelming majority of the time, they exercise their power of discretion and overlook minor offenses. Similarly, NFL officials should be instructed to watch for egregious interactions, the ones that truly give a team an unfair advantage or represent a major threat to player safety, and let the rest of them slide. That's basically the stance they take in the postseason, and it makes for a more enjoyable product on the field.

Let the players play, and toss the assholes and psychopaths. Compared to other sports, the NFL is far too timid with player ejections.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
5 years ago
I think the college system of replays is vastly superior to the NFL's, but egos preclude us from adopting it.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago
I don't watch enough college ball to be familiar with the replay system. How does it differ from the NFL's?
UserPostedImage
beast
5 years ago

Yup...

You just misunderstand the salary cap a little here. Yes, you're right Jimmy Graham's contract averaged about $10 million per season, however, that is not how the salary cap is calculated. Graham's first year cap hit was just under $6 million and Mo Wilkerson's was $5 million for 2018 season.

Graham's cap hit's for 2019 and 2020 are $12.6 million and $11.6 million respectively.

This is why I believe so many Packers fans were pissed off the Packers paid Graham that bonus (~$5 million?) in March '19 because we had an "out" and didn't take it.

As for keeping Randall Cobb over Jordy Nelson. I think both are done and finished so if we had got rid of both I would have been okay. If I had to take one or the other??

Players tend to play really well the first year away from their long tenured franchise relative to the second year so while hindsight makes me wanna say Nelson, I think I'll have to say Cobb only because he got us that win against Bears. I actually can't remember another play from 2018 with him off the top of my head.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Nope I didn't misunderstanding the cap, I just understand the fact that looking at a single year of the cap is set up to lie and your spreading the lie as truth.

Nelson being released saved 10.2 million

The second Graham signed (and didn't retire) cost the Packers $11 million in guarantees spread over the first 5 years or the life of the contract, which ever is shorter.

You're falsely arguing that since it's spread out over the 3 years it's not as much, but that's a lie as the fact is it's still $11 million dollars that you can't get back (unless he retires). Which is why there would be a $12.5+ million dead cap hit if we release him which you have totally failed to calculating to your numbers, as that money is already in Graham's pocket and has to hit the salary cap too)

If you only look at a single year then you fail to correct account for entire signing bonus... and the cap is nothing more than a delayed accounting system, the delayed part is way you need to look at more than one year.


Graham's first year of the contract cost the Packers more Nelson's final year... unless you put the single year blinders on... but money and available money can be moved from one year to another year, so there is no need for those blinders unless a team is over the single year limit (which isn't allowed) so the total money amount should be the focus than any single year (unless someone is over the limit).
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : reported, but not expected to practice
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jenkins has REPORTED for mandatory camp
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : I really thought he'd play for Packers.
buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : Packers releasing Jaire Alexander.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : (Context: he wants his defense to create turnovers)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Adam

12-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.