Packers trade for LB · PACKERSHOME

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

nerdmann
Premier Member

5 years ago

I hope Gutey didn't cave to the pressure of Micheal Rodney's smack talk on twitter. 🤣

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

earthquake
Member

5 years ago

Former 4th round pick (2016), 20 starts over the last 2 years. With all the injuries at ILB this makes a lot of sense.

Though somewhat ominous, it looks like he fell out of favor now that the Giants have switched to a 3-4. So it's curious that GB would trade for him.

I wonder who they wave to make room for him?

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

I hope Gutey didn't cave to the pressure of Micheal Rodney's smack talk on twitter. 🤣

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Who?

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

5 years ago

The Packers sure do love them some players who go by their first two initials, the middle one of which is J.

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

5 years ago

I wonder who they wave to make room for him?

Originally Posted by: earthquake

Crawford is released

Dulak
Veteran Member

5 years ago

Crawford is released

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

Would suck to make the initial 53 then get the boot the next day.

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

5 years ago

Crawford was a ST's demon.
He doesnt get claimed, I see him bumping someone from the practice squad.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

5 years ago

Crawford was a ST's demon.
He doesnt get claimed, I see him bumping someone from the practice squad.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

I vote punting Malik Taylor. I really was not sure why he was signed.

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

#10

The trade details are in (sorta)

The Packers agreed to a conditional swap of draft picks in the 7th round of the 2020 NFL Draft, offering up the 7th-rounder that they acquired from the Baltimore Ravens last year in exchange for Ty Montgomery.

acmepackingcompany wrote:

These clearly aren't all the details, and I'm going off on an assumption here, but if the Ravens finish with a worse record than the Giants, the Giants and Packers then swap 7th round picks (Ravens 7th for the Packers) with the Giants getting the higher one.

But my question is, what happens if the Giants finish off with a worse record than the Ravens? Did we just get this LB for free?/ or the cost of cutting Crawford?

It's my understanding that the Packers did the same thing (but opposite end of the player swap) with their 7th in trading away OL McCray to the Browns, if the Browns finish with a worse record the Packers and Brown's swap 7th round picks with the Packers getting the higher one.

But if the Browns have the better record, do they just get McCray for free?

SO, are these trades? Or are these bets? IF... IF I'm understanding this correctly, these seem like bets to me!

If my understanding is correct (which I'm not saying it is, then) Gute is betting the Packers will finish above the Browns and get their 7th moved up a bit, and that the Ravens will finish above the Giants and we'll get the new LB for free.

That, or there is more to this, like the conditional 7ths could move up to a 6th, but that's never mentioned and should be mentioned if those are in play.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Martha Careful (1h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (11h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (11h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (11h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (11h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (11h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (15h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (15h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (15h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (18h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (18h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (18h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (18h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (18h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (18h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (18h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (18h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (19h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (19h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (19h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (20h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (20h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (20h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (20h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (21h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (21h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (21h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (22h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS