beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
6 years ago

We'll take into account three key factors, viewed through the lens of effective passers with at least 200 attempts: pressure rate, time to throw and sacks allowed. Toss in the relative mobility of the passer in question and league-wide reputations for individual tackle performances in 2018 to make this assessment, and it's clear Bakhtiari deserves this nod.

Green Bay owned the fourth-highest average time to throw in the league at 2.96 seconds, yet allowed a pressure on Aaron Rodgers on just 21.1 percent of dropbacks, sixth-lowest in the NFL. That means the Packers are sustaining their blocks longer than any other team in the league at the most efficient rate

, an effort led by Bakhtiari.

Nick Shook of NFL.com  wrote:



Some have blindly attacking the OL, for Rodgers being pressured/taking hits, but that's just ignorance... as Rodgers has had more time than most QBs and got pressured (percentage wise) relatively little per pass play... the problem was the ball wasn't coming out of Rodgers hands, for a couple different reasons (such as scheme, QB, receiving targets), none of which the OL has any control of... of the items they can control such as time/pressure, they did a pretty good job.


The stats suggest that the Packers had one of the best pass blocking OL in the entire NFL!
Just that others couldn't maximum that extra time, at least not within the scheme.
Hopefully this ends the OL fault only excuses; but ignorance is bliss, so it's doubtful...


And yes there is a running game factor too... but 72.6% of the Packers plays were passing plays (so clearly that was a larger factor)... and the Packers were second in the NFL in yards per rushing attempt at 5.0, behind only the Panthers which have a running QB... so the running game didn't seem to suffer per run play called (and OL can't control how often certain plays are called).


I'm just trying to point out, that some need to expand their need to improve view, as the scheme, QB and receivers need to improve as well as the OGs.

UserPostedImage
blueleopard
6 years ago
Blocking for Aaron Rodgers is also significantly more difficult because he tries to extend the play even when he doesn't need to. If the offensive line stays in the middle, and Aaron rolls right, the line has to move to the right too and seal the edges. That's asking a lot from the "bug uglies."
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
Passing to set up the run, then having a great average per run, does not prove great run blocking.

Just about ever team in the playoffs had a better offensive line than we did. If you can't see that, then you probably shouldn't be on the thread.

I couldn't agree more with a key point of the post however....that tired, stale, unimaginative scheme (remember "we did not try to scheme guys open") did not free up receivers. Did any of us consistently, or any level more than rarely, see receivers running wide open? Like LA, NE, N.O., et al.

The two points are highly linked as a viable run-first, or at least balanced attack, will command more 8-9 men in the box which will lead to more viable play-action, leading to wide open receivers.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
6 years ago

Passing to set up the run, then having a great average per run, does not prove great run blocking.

Just about ever team in the playoffs had a better offensive line than we did. If you can't see that, then you probably shouldn't be on the thread.

Originally Posted by: KRK 


You're starting the personal attacks, telling me I should get off my own thread?... okay... lets' go... You're the blind one, the thread is clearly about pass blocking... if you can't see that, then you probably shouldn't be on the thread or any other because clearly you can't fucking read!

We're passing to set up to run so it doesn't count? More bullshit excuses from you!

You just blindly blame the OL, when a play fails, without the mental understanding of why it failed... because you just want to ignore facts and reason and blindly blame the OL (and sometimes it's their fault, BUT THEY'RE NOT ALONE) even when Rodgers had plenty of fucking time to pass the ball and didn't... you blindly blame the OL no matter how good of a job they did on that given play.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
ooo someone is chaffing.

whose line in the playoffs was worse than ours
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
go.pack.go.
6 years ago
Rodgers is to blame for a lot of the pressures, but I have to put most of the blame on McCarthy for not scheming anything, ever. That is key here, and I’m glad you mentioned that in your post.
UserPostedImage
Smokey
6 years ago
Independent from what has been posted in this thread, and without the benefit of analytical statistics to back me up, my 55+ years of being a football fan count as well. With no personal (or perceived) attacks intended or being contended with, I offer my opinion on GB's OL and the Passing game.

The first question to ask is, Has the GB OL been doing it's job to protect their QB Aaron Rodgers ?

The answer is not so simple as we would like to make it. The Left Tackle is maybe the best in the game at this point in time. Also, the Center and Left Guard have done very well. The level of play dropped off a bit with the Right Guard and Right Tackle positions. Bulaga has had problems with injuries and his play on the field suffered due to those injuries. In addition, the play at RG has not been that outstanding either. Furthermore, when replacements took over the RG and RT positions, the Right side of GB's O-Line suffered.

That said, GB's O-Line did do their required jobs most of the time. They allowed their QB the time to do his job. However, most know that QB protection is not expected to exceed more than a few seconds. As a result, if the QB is scrambling around, extending plays, holding onto the football, then there must be a good reason why. That reason is that his receivers are covered and they can't get themselves open.

Wide Receivers, Tight Ends, and even Running Backs depend on two assets to get open so that they become good targets for their QB. Those qualities being Speed, Agility, and/or both. IMO, the inability of GB's receivers to get open, was the #1 malady of the GB Offense. Injuries to inexperience to even poor play calling resulted in Rogers running for his life. The predictability of McCarthy's play calling also allowed opposing defenses to blitz at the worst times for GB.

With the healthy return of Allison, the gained experience of the returning WRs from their rookie seasons, and a less predictable offense should help elevate GB's passing game in 2019. Additionally, with healthy O-Linemen (and hopefully picking up a top new OT in the 2019 NFL Draft), the GB Offense should be in better shape.

One critical point however will be the TE position. Coach LaFleur's offensive system depends upon blocking TEs. Jimmy Graham, who can't block, may need to be traded. Weather through FA or with the draft, GB will need a big, strong TE that can block and o yes catch too. The reason being that the running game is expected to gain in importance in the new offensive system.

Yes, I'd like GB to draft OT, then an Edge Rusher, and then... , but if it makes more sense to grab an Edge Rusher 1st, then they should go for it. I'm basically pointing at where I believe GB has needs. FA may well help fill need at the Safety and LB positions as well.

This is going to be a really interesting and challenging offseason for the Packers. Much will need to be addressed as we move forward. I just wish all of the Packer's organization super good luck as they enter into a new era of winning GB Football.


GoPackGo

UserPostedImage
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
6 years ago

Rodgers is to blame for a lot of the pressures, but I have to put most of the blame on McCarthy for not scheming anything, ever. That is key here, and I’m glad you mentioned that in your post.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



Yes, I want to put blame on Rodgers for ignoring short passes early in the game, and then continue to ignore short passes later in the game, looking for the big play when it was already consistently not getting anything on the extended plays... BUT ... part of the scheme is keep extending, keep extending.... so where to draw the line of blame there between Rodgers vs scheme, because he was also following the general scheme that he has been for years of waiting for something big down field to open up and hit it....

But this year, there was a mixture of less guys getting open down field, and less Rodgers seeing them, and less Rodgers trusting his first instinct and pulling that trigger because the trust/chemistry wasn't there between the scheme, Rodgers and the new receivers.

I'm very glad some people have the mental ability to understand it's not just the OL fault.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
Dilly Dilly....Will the guy who said its "just the OL fault" please defend his position.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
6 years ago

That said, GB's O-Line did do their required jobs most of the time. They allowed their QB the time to do his job. However, most know that QB protection is not expected to exceed more than a few seconds. As a result, if the QB is scrambling around, extending plays, holding onto the football, then there must be a good reason why. That reason is that his receivers are covered and they can't get themselves open.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



That's all I'm saying... it's not JUST the OL fault, other parts of the offense share in the blame, and step up next year as well... and as we all agree, the scheme didn't help... as it put the WRs in iso routes and asked the OL/QB to stall a long time (putting a lot of pressure on them) until something came open down field and hit it.... well something between the scheme, QB and receivers just wasn't working even when the OL did a relatively good job in pass blocking (according to the stats).


With the healthy return of Allison, the gained experience of the returning WRs from their rookie seasons, and a less predictable offense should help elevate GB's passing game in 2019. Additionally, with healthy O-Linemen (and hopefully picking up a top new OT in the 2019 NFL Draft), the GB Offense should be in better shape.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 


In theory I got no problem with a drafting a new OT high in the draft (especially with Bulaga going into a contract year)... but the OTs talked about going in the 1st round this year have looked substandard to me compared to OTs in other 1st round years... and I'm thinking 2nd or 3rd round might be better.

Though I generally think an OG in the 1st is waste, unless you think they're a future Hall of Famer, because you can find them later in the draft at a much better value point. But some future Hall of Famers like Steve Hutchinson, probably Quenton Nelson..... and I wanted Jack Conklin (who I saw as a young Steve Hutchinson) if he fell to the Packers to be an OG... of course Titans took him in the top 10 and basically run out of double set TEs where Conklin was sorta an OG/RT tweener often having a TE on the outside of him at times and made All-Pro (I think) (that was before LaFleur got there... the star TE got a season ending injured week 1 when LaFleur was there).


One critical point however will be the TE position. Coach LaFleur's offensive system depends upon blocking TEs. Jimmy Graham, who can't block, may need to be traded. Weather through FA or with the draft, GB will need a big, strong TE that can block and o yes catch too. The reason being that the running game is expected to gain in importance in the new offensive system.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 

I'm not an expect in LaFleur's system... but I think he's worked with both receiving and blocking TEs over the year. Last year he had big plans for a start receiving TE, it's just that he got a season ending injury in week 1. But with the Redskins and Falcons he's had them... and who knows, they might use Graham as a possession WR some of the time.

Though I'm interesting in seeing if they bring a TE in via FA... weather it's the jack of all trades Kendicks, run blocking king Lewis or someone different...


Yes, I'd like GB to draft OT, then an Edge Rusher, and then... , but if it makes more sense to grab an Edge Rusher 1st, then they should go for it. I'm basically pointing at where I believe GB has needs. FA may well help fill need at the Safety and LB positions as well.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 

It all depends on how the draft falls... but this draft is top heavy in defensive front guys, so I think it's very well you could see an Edge Rusher (or maybe FS Deionte Thompson) go to the Packers with their first pick.


.GoPackGo.
[cheers]




UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : reported, but not expected to practice
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jenkins has REPORTED for mandatory camp
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : I really thought he'd play for Packers.
buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : Packers releasing Jaire Alexander.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : (Context: he wants his defense to create turnovers)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Adam

12-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines