Rumor : Jordy Nelson to retire??· Page 2

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#11

I don't think this is true. We'd have heard about it by now. Damn rumors.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#12

Which injury? His first, second or third this season. Jordy's stats are way better than Cobb's yet some can never accept that without questioning the fan's loyalty or claiming that for some reason I hate the guy which is beyond laughable.

When have I ever lamented our lost players on this forum? And please don't try and say I hate anyone on this team. I questioned the choice of Cobb over Nelson. Some people will fight to the end that management made the right choice even with its obvious that Cobb is a shell of his former self and even on a shitty Raiders team it Jordy is still outperforming him.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

If Cobb was healthy then he would be running better. I don’t see anything from him when he’s healthy that would make me think he’s “lost it” like many people here are saying. I think many people have a bad taste for Cobb just because we kept him instead of Jordy. My opinion? We should’ve kept both of them.

Our receiving core could be:
Adams
Nelson
Cobb
Allison
Valdes-Scantling
St.Brown

In no particular order after Adams.

DoddPower
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#13

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

Cobb and Nelson are both dinosaurs now.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#14

Cobb and Nelson are both dinosaurs now.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower

Cobb is only 28.

wpr
Preferred Member

6 years ago

#15

Cobb is only 28.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go.

Aren't football years similar to dog years? Very very short.

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

#16

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go.

Allison will be swapped out with Trevor Davis shortly.

Cobb lost a step after the big contract, but he seemed to have gained half a step back this year. Still he's not what he was. Better than just a guy, but not elite.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

He doesn’t need to be elite. He’s still valuable to us when healthy. He’s as good as there is at coming back to the ball during the scramble drill. He’s a trusted target for Rodgers.

On another note, I’ve seen many people crying about letting go of Jordy. Yet I’ve seen those same people complain about Cobb losing a step. Jordy has most definitely lost a step, and he’s 5 years older than Cobb.

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#18

From what I can tell, it looks like there was the one story, then several stories who jumped on the original.

The trade deadline has passed

The only way Jordy could come available to The Packers is if Gruden gave him his outright release, then Jordy would be able to sign with any team he wantes to.

The Packers play on Thursday, then have 10 days off.
Hmmmmmm
I think The team would welcome Jordy back with open arms .

He isn't a #1, but a #3 or #4, playing in the slot and on goal line situations, imho, Jordy would make the team better.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Cheesey
Preferred Member

6 years ago

#19

Aren't football years similar to dog years? Very very short.

Originally Posted by: wpr

Only for guys like Vince BIEGEL!🤣

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#20

On another note, I’ve seen many people crying about letting go of Jordy. Yet I’ve seen those same people complain about Cobb losing a step. Jordy has most definitely lost a step, and he’s 5 years older than Cobb.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go.

I keep on seeing this "lost a step" argument or "lack of separation" argument for Jordy, but please show me in his stats where he had not performed except with a useless back-up QB or with the train wreck Raiders. His stats last year were great with Aaron. I swear this line has been made up to blind people from actually looking at his football stats.

http://www.nfl.com/player/jordynelson/1032/careerstats

"He's great when healthy"

Cobb has been injured ever since he got his big contract. I complain about him because he never earned one year of his big contract. I don't care if he is younger, the fact is we had them both for 1 year. Cobb can only play slot where Jordy can play both outside and slot and is a redzone monster.

http://www.nfl.com/player/randallcobb/2495448/careerstats

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (5h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (10h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (11h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (21h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (22h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS