As usual, the posters who bloviate the most are the most inaccurate, ill-informed, and seem to lack the basic observation and factual assessment skills to understand the situation, serve on a jury, and probably should be stripped of their right to make him any meaningful decision in their own lives, much less anybody else’s.
Lacking in any of these attacks, on what would appear to be a fine man, are a basic understanding fundamental issues which are explicitly stated in our constitution, and every penal code which addresses these issues.
Point 1 is a presumption of innocence. This fundamental principle is the case whether you are accused of shoplifting, murder, rape, irrespective of what you are applying for aspiring to, or the position you’re in.
Second, is the fact that there needs to be corroborating evidence presented in order to fully prosecute anybody for anything. To the simpletons reading this, that means one person‘s word against another doesn’t hold sway
Finally, the third principle is in all of our laws there are statutes of limitations.
To the first point, to the folks who get all their facts from MSNBC and CNN...this is, in fact, a proceeding in which the accused is presumed innocent. At least that is the case according to our Constitution.
Second, Every single piece of corroborating evidence is in the favor of the judge. Nothing in this woman story is consistent with the fact set or allegations presented. ALL the other data and witnesses who have been asked to corroborate of the story have either explicitly undermined her statements or they all contradict her recollection.
Third, and the vast majority of our penal code, is a statute of limitations. It is grossly unfair to accuse somebody and ask them to defend themselves for actions taken 35 years ago, when you didn’t tell anybody, file a police report, or do anything about it contemporaneously.
All the women in my life know to scratch, claw, dig, and do anything that would provide physical evidence under your fingernails. If the government doesn’t take care of it, I will. Second they all know to file a police report as soon as possible. By the way, you’ll note that none of these accusers of filed police reports as to do would open them up to prosecution.
Also in regard to the assessment of his performance, I actually have a job and didn’t have the time to watch it. However in the snippets I saw, I thought he showed remarkable poise. I would’ve told the senators to go fuck themselves during the inane ridiculous questioning.
Kavanaugh is a strict constitutionalist. He believes the Constitution should be interpreted as it was originally written and subsequently amended. To describe him as anything different illustrates an absolute lack of understanding of the constitution or his record.
But he is the embodiment of what all statists and the leftists HATE...A white male heterosexual who believes in the rule of law and the constitution.
Also, the real losers in this will be the women who were actually raped. The other losers will be women in general because entrepreneurs and other employers will not put themselves in a situation to be alone with women and open themselves up to unjust accusations down the road.
This will be my last correspondence on this topic. I go to this blog to escape from every day life, but I felt compelled to reply to the previously posts.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK