LB Khalil Mack on trading block???· Page 4

Cheesey
Preferred Member

6 years ago

Man....this kind of thread is just another reason I’m not a NFL GM.
I keep going back and forth on this.

Either way, IF (and it’s a BIG if) the Packers are actually going to try to get him, it better be real soon. It would take time to get up to speed with our defense, and be able to really contribute.
More quality help on defense would be great. This is THE season to make the big push.

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

#32

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

It’s not a question of to do it or not, to me it’s a question of value. Is he worth what we’d have to pay? Combine at LEAST a first with, whatever we have left in the cap.

That’s why I lean against it. If Clay and Nick bang into each other tonight and are both lost for the year, I might reconsider.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#33

yooperfan
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#34

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Alrighty then, Packers being most likely.
I seriously doubt it though.

wpr
Preferred Member

6 years ago

#35

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

If the bookies say so it must be true.

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#36

If the bookies say so it must be true.

Originally Posted by: wpr

Yes because bookies jobs are to tell you the truth and put more money back in your pockets.

They sure were correct with Dez Bryant to the Packers too!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#37

Yes because bookies jobs are to tell you the truth and put more money back in your pockets.

They sure were correct with Dez Bryant to the Packers too!

Originally Posted by: beast

I don't know that it really matters one way or another, just thought it was amusing. What did OddsShark post about Dez Bryant coming to the Packers? And did Dez sign with Browns or someone else?

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

#38

I'd take Khalil over Dez anyday if it was an even trade. But Dez is a free agent. I guess I'd still rather offer a high pick for Khalil than take Dez off the street. lol

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#39

I don't know that it really matters one way or another, just thought it was amusing. What did OddsShark post about Dez Bryant coming to the Packers? And did Dez sign with Browns or someone else?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I'd take Khalil over Dez anyday if it was an even trade. But Dez is a free agent. I guess I'd still rather offer a high pick for Khalil than take Dez off the street. lol

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Maybe a single high pick... but some talk about multiple very high picks and a 20+ million per year deal. That's possible one player for the price of four.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#40

I completely agree it was amusing and it was posted for fun.

I don't know what company it was, but I saw Dez Bryant odds, where the best odds where him coming to the Packers, and the comment was about bookies in general.

Maybe a single high pick... but some talk about multiple very high picks and a 20+ million per year deal. That's possible one player for the price of four.

Originally Posted by: beast

So if one bookie says one thing, it goes for all bookies? I'm bookie ignorant so I really don't know. I thought different bookies had different odds, and that's why I asked for the OddsShark deal with Dez Bryant so we could compare them.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (4h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab

Zero2Cool (6h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!

beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22