The Packers agree to terms with Mo Wilkerson, a source said.· Page 3

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

Cheesey
Preferred Member

6 years ago

I don’t live in Green Bay, but every time I have been there I have seen plenty of black people. Today’s Green Bay is not the 1960’s one.
There is plenty to do there, for any race of people.
It’s not New York or Los Angeles, but it doesn’t have as much crime as the “big cities”.
If you are a family man, and NOT just looking to party, it’s s great place.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#22

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

We have plenty of Black folks. My cousins feel they need to date every single one of them. 🙂 (nothing wrong with that either)

Anyhow, as for that Wilkerson guy. TE blocking?

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#23

Contract details???

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

#24

Contract details???

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

1 year, $5mil, iirc.

Not a major area of need, but I like the contract. Unlike Jimmy Graham's.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#25

Makes our Defensive line very solid now.

Went from "not really an area of need" to one of our strengths.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

sschind
Senior Member

6 years ago

#26

Makes our Defensive line very solid now.

Went from "not really an area of need" to one of our strengths.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

A perfect example of the fact that every upgrade improves your team. It may not be the upgrade that everyone wants or expects or the one the team needs the most but there should be little doubt that our D line just got batter and a better D line means a better team. IF the CB situation is not addressed further then we can talk about how BG screwed up but in the meantime we should be happy, not satisfied mind you but happy, that, at one position at least, we did get better.

wpr
Preferred Member

6 years ago

#27

So, back to football, living near Rockford. Having a couple of clients that know the Lowry family. (His dad is a judge.)

I am interested to hear how the DL rotation is going to be with Mo in the mix.

I don't think Dean embarrassed himself last year. He should take another step forward this year. That said if Mo plays to his fullest abilities he will get 2/3 of the snaps. I am not sure if Dean will be asked to slide over and give Daniels a breather or if M Adams gets the nod.

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#28

I am interested to hear how the DL rotation is going to be with Mo in the mix.

I don't think Dean embarrassed himself last year. He should take another step forward this year. That said if Mo plays to his fullest abilities he will get 2/3 of the snaps. I am not sure if Dean will be asked to slide over and give Daniels a breather or if M Adams gets the nod.

Originally Posted by: wpr

I don't think anyone can answer until we have seen the scheme that is going to be run and how exactly they are going to run it.

I'm thinking we might see more 3 DL sets on the field... and I did read where the DC said he was going to use the OLB in coverage more... which means someone else is going to be asked to take/hold the edge.

So I'm thinking we could see a number of sets with Daniels, Clark and Wilkerson on the field at the same time... with Lowry and Adams rotating in.

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

#29

Originally Posted by: wpr

Dan has the edge over Montravius. Montravius needs to prove he can get it done at this level.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

#30

Originally Posted by: sschind

The reason I like it is because of the contract. Yeah he improves the team, but he doesn't break the bank in doing so. 👍

Unlike Graham.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋

Zero2Cool (2h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever

Zero2Cool (2h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.

Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.

Mucky Tundra (3h) : Kanata, seek help! lol

beast (5h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (5h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (5h) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (5h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

beast (6h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent

beast (6h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime

beast (6h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing

Zero2Cool (7h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is

Zero2Cool (7h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true

beast (8h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management

wpr (10h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (18h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (26-Dec) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS