Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
7 years ago
I'm going to get right into it ...

- Im not even sure I heard CM3 once ...? anyone - but I sure heard Nick Perry's and of course Mike Daniels (that ones series was Awesome!)

- I liked Jake Ryan's passion for the game I dont think I saw him much out there.

- Tell me why we had to get rid of lang? Our Oline especially the right side was like a sieve. They kept coming through that side and rodgers had no time to throw. I just got done watching the dallas game and Dak had all the time in the world and I dont really want to see how much time matt ryan has with atlanta next week. I know we still have bulaga but I really liked lang also. Is lang worth it? I know we spent a little money on some other guys but so far Im not liking what I see.

- Our D played awesome this game; although Im still not convinced on our 2 top pick corners form last year. I liked seeing house back out there.

- For some reason I still think cook would of been better to have on our team then bennett. But well wait and see about that; too bad cook's agent had to well price him out.

- I'm still not sold on ty being out #1 RB; he is such a good receiver I really rather we use his as that instead and I dont want to see him hurt hitting those piles.

- Nice to see lacy getting practically 0 yards that game :)

- IMO I think rodgers game was off at the start just because he had no pocket to work with and crap protection.

anyways ... great game and glad we wont that.
isocleas2
7 years ago

I'm going to get right into it ...

- Im not even sure I heard CM3 once ...? anyone - but I sure heard Nick Perry's and of course Mike Daniels (that ones series was Awesome!)

- I liked Jake Ryan's passion for the game I dont think I saw him much out there.

- Tell me why we had to get rid of lang? Our Oline especially the right side was like a sieve. They kept coming through that side and rodgers had no time to throw. I just got done watching the dallas game and Dak had all the time in the world and I dont really want to see how much time matt ryan has with atlanta next week. I know we still have bulaga but I really liked lang also. Is lang worth it? I know we spent a little money on some other guys but so far Im not liking what I see.

- Our D played awesome this game; although Im still not convinced on our 2 top pick corners form last year. I liked seeing house back out there.

- For some reason I still think cook would of been better to have on our team then bennett. But well wait and see about that; too bad cook's agent had to well price him out.

- I'm still not sold on ty being out #1 RB; he is such a good receiver I really rather we use his as that instead and I dont want to see him hurt hitting those piles.

- Nice to see lacy getting practically 0 yards that game :)

- IMO I think rodgers game was off at the start just because he had no pocket to work with and crap protection.

anyways ... great game and glad we wont that.

Originally Posted by: Dulak 



Can't afford to keep them all, If the Packers sign Lang it means atleast one of Burnett/Adams/Linsley/Taylor would be let go this year. Also Lang's replacement (Evans) graded out really well Sunday, I think he received one of the five highest grades after the game. The Seahawks defense is good enough they'll make alot of O-lines look bad when missing their probowl right tackle.
Bigbyfan
7 years ago
Kenny Clark and HHCD both quietly had great games as well. The Packers need to get HHCD signed as soon as possible. His price tag is only gonna go up as time goes by.
blank
beast
7 years ago

I'm going to get right into it ...

- Im not even sure I heard CM3 once ...? anyone - but I sure heard Nick Perry's and of course Mike Daniels (that ones series was Awesome!)

- I liked Jake Ryan's passion for the game I dont think I saw him much out there.

- Tell me why we had to get rid of lang? Our Oline especially the right side was like a sieve. They kept coming through that side and rodgers had no time to throw. I just got done watching the dallas game and Dak had all the time in the world and I dont really want to see how much time matt ryan has with atlanta next week. I know we still have bulaga but I really liked lang also. Is lang worth it? I know we spent a little money on some other guys but so far Im not liking what I see.

- Our D played awesome this game; although Im still not convinced on our 2 top pick corners form last year. I liked seeing house back out there.

- For some reason I still think cook would of been better to have on our team then bennett. But well wait and see about that; too bad cook's agent had to well price him out.

- I'm still not sold on ty being out #1 RB; he is such a good receiver I really rather we use his as that instead and I dont want to see him hurt hitting those piles.

- Nice to see lacy getting practically 0 yards that game :)

- IMO I think rodgers game was off at the start just because he had no pocket to work with and crap protection.

anyways ... great game and glad we wont that.

Originally Posted by: Dulak 



To summarize, it seems like you simply don't like change as you just complained about all the changes.

Matthews was chasing Wilson well, he just doesn't have the speed to catch him when he has somewhere to move to.

As others have said Evans graded out very well in this game, and you can't overpay everyone, got to be choosy who you pay the big $ to. Who knows, Murphy might be the future starting RG.

Packers seemed to go with their best coverage guys... Which included Burnett and Martinez over Jake Ryan.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
7 years ago

To summarize, it seems like you simply don't like change as you just complained about all the changes.

Matthews was chasing Wilson well, he just doesn't have the speed to catch him when he has somewhere to move to.

As others have said Evans graded out very well in this game, and you can't overpay everyone, got to be choosy who you pay the big $ to. Who knows, Murphy might be the future starting RG.

Packers seemed to go with their best coverage guys... Which included Burnett and Martinez over Jake Ryan.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Well, as far as change - lets just say I really liked the oline last year and liked most of it the year before that ... I can see how having the same guys stick together and work as a team and how that relates to us winning games works.

Just not sure about the new guys. Good to know about evans (I didnt know that).

ahh so thats why ryan wasnt played as much - so they used a safety inplace of a ilb? ie burnett - Ive always liked burnett (except the year he played with a club? - not sure how you play safety with a club but ...) - he made some decent plays this game too).

cant believe we have seattle then atlanta then dallas all within the first 5 games. Will be interesting. Like I mentioned before watched the dallas/NY game and dallas sure looked good (all around).

Nice thing about this year it seems so far our D has been upgraded. But again seeing how they do vs the 2 other teams above will be the real test
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
7 years ago

Well, as far as change - lets just say I really liked the oline last year and liked most of it the year before that ... I can see how having the same guys stick together and work as a team and how that relates to us winning games works.

Just not sure about the new guys. Good to know about evans (I didnt know that).

ahh so thats why ryan wasnt played as much - so they used a safety inplace of a ilb? ie burnett - Ive always liked burnett (except the year he played with a club? - not sure how you play safety with a club but ...) - he made some decent plays this game too).

cant believe we have seattle then atlanta then dallas all within the first 5 games. Will be interesting. Like I mentioned before watched the dallas/NY game and dallas sure looked good (all around).

Nice thing about this year it seems so far our D has been upgraded. But again seeing how they do vs the 2 other teams above will be the real test

Originally Posted by: Dulak 



Talking about the Packers schedule- how about laying 3 of the last 4 and 4 of the last 6 games on the road? That's always fun. The only team they get at home in the coldest part of the season is the vickies. Yeah they get Tampa i the early part of Dec so what. But that is for another time and another thread.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (12m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (20m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (32m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.