My thoughts on the seattle game

Dulak
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

I'm going to get right into it ...

- Im not even sure I heard CM3 once ...? anyone - but I sure heard Nick Perry's and of course Mike Daniels (that ones series was Awesome!)

- I liked Jake Ryan's passion for the game I dont think I saw him much out there.

- Tell me why we had to get rid of lang? Our Oline especially the right side was like a sieve. They kept coming through that side and rodgers had no time to throw. I just got done watching the dallas game and Dak had all the time in the world and I dont really want to see how much time matt ryan has with atlanta next week. I know we still have bulaga but I really liked lang also. Is lang worth it? I know we spent a little money on some other guys but so far Im not liking what I see.

- Our D played awesome this game; although Im still not convinced on our 2 top pick corners form last year. I liked seeing house back out there.

- For some reason I still think cook would of been better to have on our team then bennett. But well wait and see about that; too bad cook's agent had to well price him out.

- I'm still not sold on ty being out #1 RB; he is such a good receiver I really rather we use his as that instead and I dont want to see him hurt hitting those piles.

- Nice to see lacy getting practically 0 yards that game :)

- IMO I think rodgers game was off at the start just because he had no pocket to work with and crap protection.

anyways ... great game and glad we wont that.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

isocleas2
Member

7 years ago

I'm going to get right into it ...

- Im not even sure I heard CM3 once ...? anyone - but I sure heard Nick Perry's and of course Mike Daniels (that ones series was Awesome!)

- I liked Jake Ryan's passion for the game I dont think I saw him much out there.

- Tell me why we had to get rid of lang? Our Oline especially the right side was like a sieve. They kept coming through that side and rodgers had no time to throw. I just got done watching the dallas game and Dak had all the time in the world and I dont really want to see how much time matt ryan has with atlanta next week. I know we still have bulaga but I really liked lang also. Is lang worth it? I know we spent a little money on some other guys but so far Im not liking what I see.

- Our D played awesome this game; although Im still not convinced on our 2 top pick corners form last year. I liked seeing house back out there.

- For some reason I still think cook would of been better to have on our team then bennett. But well wait and see about that; too bad cook's agent had to well price him out.

- I'm still not sold on ty being out #1 RB; he is such a good receiver I really rather we use his as that instead and I dont want to see him hurt hitting those piles.

- Nice to see lacy getting practically 0 yards that game :)

- IMO I think rodgers game was off at the start just because he had no pocket to work with and crap protection.

anyways ... great game and glad we wont that.

Originally Posted by: Dulak

Can't afford to keep them all, If the Packers sign Lang it means atleast one of Burnett/Adams/Linsley/Taylor would be let go this year. Also Lang's replacement (Evans) graded out really well Sunday, I think he received one of the five highest grades after the game. The Seahawks defense is good enough they'll make alot of O-lines look bad when missing their probowl right tackle.

Bigbyfan
Member

7 years ago

Kenny Clark and HHCD both quietly had great games as well. The Packers need to get HHCD signed as soon as possible. His price tag is only gonna go up as time goes by.

blank

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

Originally Posted by: Dulak

To summarize, it seems like you simply don't like change as you just complained about all the changes.

Matthews was chasing Wilson well, he just doesn't have the speed to catch him when he has somewhere to move to.

As others have said Evans graded out very well in this game, and you can't overpay everyone, got to be choosy who you pay the big $ to. Who knows, Murphy might be the future starting RG.

Packers seemed to go with their best coverage guys... Which included Burnett and Martinez over Jake Ryan.

Dulak
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

Originally Posted by: beast

Well, as far as change - lets just say I really liked the oline last year and liked most of it the year before that ... I can see how having the same guys stick together and work as a team and how that relates to us winning games works.

Just not sure about the new guys. Good to know about evans (I didnt know that).

ahh so thats why ryan wasnt played as much - so they used a safety inplace of a ilb? ie burnett - Ive always liked burnett (except the year he played with a club? - not sure how you play safety with a club but ...) - he made some decent plays this game too).

cant believe we have seattle then atlanta then dallas all within the first 5 games. Will be interesting. Like I mentioned before watched the dallas/NY game and dallas sure looked good (all around).

Nice thing about this year it seems so far our D has been upgraded. But again seeing how they do vs the 2 other teams above will be the real test

wpr
Preferred Member

7 years ago

Well, as far as change - lets just say I really liked the oline last year and liked most of it the year before that ... I can see how having the same guys stick together and work as a team and how that relates to us winning games works.

Just not sure about the new guys. Good to know about evans (I didnt know that).

ahh so thats why ryan wasnt played as much - so they used a safety inplace of a ilb? ie burnett - Ive always liked burnett (except the year he played with a club? - not sure how you play safety with a club but ...) - he made some decent plays this game too).

cant believe we have seattle then atlanta then dallas all within the first 5 games. Will be interesting. Like I mentioned before watched the dallas/NY game and dallas sure looked good (all around).

Nice thing about this year it seems so far our D has been upgraded. But again seeing how they do vs the 2 other teams above will be the real test

Originally Posted by: Dulak

Talking about the Packers schedule- how about laying 3 of the last 4 and 4 of the last 6 games on the road? That's always fun. The only team they get at home in the coldest part of the season is the vickies. Yeah they get Tampa i the early part of Dec so what. But that is for another time and another thread.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (1h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (1h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (4h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (4h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (4h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (4h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (4h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (4h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (4h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (5h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (5h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (6h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (6h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (6h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (6h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (6h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (7h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (7h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (7h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (8h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (9h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (9h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (10h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (10h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (10h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (10h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (10h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (10h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (10h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (10h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (10h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (10h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (10h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (10h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (10h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (10h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (10h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (10h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (11h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (11h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (11h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (11h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (11h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS