If this is the case, I'm sick thinking about how Seattle actually went ALL IN and we're standing by looking for crumbs from the table...

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

Trading Richardson never was going to be an easy proposition, and perhaps the Jets are just not finding any takers. The 26-year-old defensive lineman/linebacker is immensely talented. He won the Defensive Rookie of the Year in 2013 and went to the Pro Bowl in 2014. But off-the-field issues, suspensions and a recent drop-off in production have made him more difficult to trade than a few years ago.

Then, there is his contract situation. Richardson, entering the final year of his deal, is scheduled to make $8.1 million this season. He has not been shy about his desire to land a huge contract, with some speculation he would seek a $100 million deal.

nypost  wrote:

Makes me wonder if they are going to hold Adams over the roster, or by looking, does that indicate they aren't? I think they're IRing Adams, tomorrow, and that's why they're looking.

BTW, YOU read Bob McGinn? LOL. :)

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

I think the smart move would be to have Adams eligible to bring back, even if you don't bring him back... because you never know when you might need an extra guy, and while Adams clearly needs to learn, he has some raw natural pass rushing bull rush that would be nice to have on fresh legs later on in the season.

I have a couple of twitter items open in tabs, including journal sentinel's packers beat writers, which I guess still list McGinn and post his stuff as well.
https://twitter.com/journalsentinel/lists/packers-beat-writers?lang=en 

Originally Posted by: beast 

If this is the case, I'm sick thinking about how Seattle actually went ALL IN and we're standing by looking for crumbs from the table...

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

We're far too many ????s away from being one or two moves away from going all in. Our O Line looks like the worst out of the gate as I've seen in as long as I remember, the D line needs serious help, LBs need help, and about 4 other different positions are one injury away from needing desperate help.

Frankly, without a lot of luck we're at best a 12-4 team this year. Wouldn't be shocked if we went 10-6.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 

12-4 is aiming high for a team with this many issues. Week 1 is going to be interesting watching our overmatched OL take on their overpowering DL. Only saving grace is Seattle sucks on the road and we have RW's number on D for some reason.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

That's why I said 12-4 at best. We still have ARod, a deep WR corps, Montgomery, Martellus Bennett. Special teams is looking great. With the defense playing reasonably given the talent, without a bunch of major injuries we've definitely got the talent to go 12-4.

I mean, is it completely insane to consider that we could sweep the division? I'd be shocked if we did worse than 4-2. Browns and panthers? Falcons? Saints? Ravens? Seahawks on the road we could easily lose to but we should win. I mean really, which 4 games do we need to luck out completely to win/have no chance of winning?

Originally Posted by: Porforis