Yep!Rams could have had him for 2 years at 4.25 and cut him with no dead money. So, It'll be a cheap deal.If R.Rodgers is cut/traded we can save 1.8M and A.Rodgers doesn't like him.GB Paid Beau Sandland not to jump to another team from our practice squad; so they like him.Not sure we keep 4 TEs.
Originally Posted by: Barfarn
YepIf R.Rodgers is cut/traded we can save 1.8M and A.Rodgers doesn't like him..
Where the hell did you hear Aaron Rodgers doesn't like Richard Rodgers? LOL. The guy arguably has the best hands out of all our targets over the past two years not to mention that Hail Mary. Oh yeah, he played in Cal.I like the Kendricks signing though.
Originally Posted by: blueleopard
Complete speculation on your part. Evidence? Link? Was it not just 6 weeks ago that he chucked him a long ball touch down against Dallas?...
Originally Posted by: FLORIDA PACKER88
Didn't hear it...I saw it. ARodgers skipped an open RRodgers in the progression more than any other receiver by 3 to 1.
How about the fact that Ted just went out and signed TWO top free agent TEs? No CBs, no OLBs, no RBs, yet. But TE? TWO of them. 🤣
Originally Posted by: nerdmann
Means Ted sees no problem with his CBs he drafted and has complete faith in the defense. After all they had alot of injuries last year. Isn't that the excuse we use every year?
Originally Posted by: dhazer
The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close