10 - 6 is dismal for Packers· Page 3

Porforis
Veteran Member

7 years ago

Do you take into account that Aaron Rodgers has a hurt calf on one leg and a bad hamstring on the other? OR does that not matter with your slanted perception against the Packers success?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Or our MASH unit at CB. But hey, only excuses for other teams right?

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#22

Do you take into account that Aaron Rodgers has a hurt calf on one leg and a bad hamstring on the other? OR does that not matter with your slanted perception against the Packers success?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Slanted? I think my perception is one of the only ones here that isn't. Success? If the organizational goal is to win SB championships and this year we don't win one what have we done? Failed. It is not successful to fall short of your goal. If your goal is to win divisional championships only then mission accomplished. Be proud. Order your gear, TODAY! Your own definition of success for this team is not in consort with the organizations. My definition is. It's right in line. Anything short of hoisting the Lombardi is not a successful. Exciting? Sure. Overcoming adversity. Sure. Not bad for being 4-6 sure. It's all those things but it's also short of the goal so it's...FAILURE...ta da. Do you think Pats fans think it's a successful season when they win the division and go down in the playoffs. I assure you they don't. They have expectation based on past success and having Tom Brady and it's justified. Our fans have the expectation of making the playoffs and calling it a win for the season. I see it bragged about all the time... the streak is x many years. Who cares? I'll take ONE SB victory vs. 50 straight playoff appearances without one. Ask Vikings fans how it feels not ever winning a SB. They better understand my point than most of you do.

I'm going to go try and hit my goal of 25 reps of 225. If I put up 24, I'm going to party like it's 1999 and call it a big success??? LOL. No. I'm going to be very upset I fell short of my goal and I couldn't quite pump that last rep. Again, there is no way to spin that falling short of your goal is a success. We try and win every game. When we lose we fell short of our goal and it wasn't a success. A season is no different. Can you imagine spinning losing a game into it being a big success? Why are you doing it with a season? Oh, right...because football is hard and not hitting your goal is acceptable.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#23

Or our MASH unit at CB. But hey, only excuses for other teams right?

Originally Posted by: Porforis

Seriously the guy is simply just a troll... he's unusual in that he trolls himself and his team, but still talks out of both sides of his mouth, say outlandish things one way, then when that's proven wrong... he's change his argument and say the outlandish thing the other way.

A few months ago, the Packers would be extremely lucky to get to 7-9... and only dreamer wearing rose colored glasses, who didn't live in reality could see the Packers with a winning season... which of course he was too big of a pussy to post on the form and so he only wrote it on Shout.

Now that once again he's proven wrong... he's saying winning record is horrible (after saying no way the Packers could do it). What bullshit. It's only horrible for those rooting against the Packers which clearly he has done... as he's been happy after Packers lost, and til this day, I've NEVER EVER seen a "Packers fan" bitch so much about a Bears loss (especially when it was the Packers beating the Bears... also I'm trying to remember... that game might of been for the division championship too). Hell, I know a number of Bears fans that bitched less, about how the Packers shouldn't of won the game, after that loss than he did.

At the end of the day, he's just here to say he's right... and since he takes both sides of an argument (no way the Packers will have a winning season / a winning season is a poor season for the Packers) he's going to say he's right... because he picks all options until it's the right one. And when you clearly catch him in a wrong argument, he changes subjects and the debate. Just like all the other trolls.

blueleopard
Member

7 years ago

#24

Soft schedule and we went against more playoff teams than any other team in the playoffs. Try again.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#25

Originally Posted by: beast

I stay out of forums in season...have been doing that for years. It's post season so I returned. I love how you say I was proven wrong as if you and the rest of this forum was certain we were making the playoffs at 4-6. I saw even the most hardened optimist lose hope then. I'm surprised Rodgers woke up. I'd like to know why? He slept walked for 18 months and all of a sudden started playing at 4-5? He did play well at Wash who is terrible on D, but he played well. Why all of a sudden? There is a reason. I was hoping 4-6 would continue for regime change purposes. It was a dream at 4-6 the way this D was playing to think we would reach 8-8. We over did it by 2. I thought 7-9, maybe. Yes, I was wrong but please don't act like I was alone in my thinking about this team back then. It was one of the few times what I thought actually meshed with the majority here.

I'm glad you spent a post telling me I'm a troll. Nothing makes me laugh more than the liberal use of that word. Do you know what it means or is it your safe word? I'm not a troll in any sense of the definition. I post what I truly believe. I am wrong just like all of you are. It's ironic that when I am wrong I'm just castigated but when I'm right it's ignored. It's further ignored in the very simple questions I ask that don't get answered. That is not a troll. You are just unable to answer and feel threatened so I must be a troll? Sure. Nothing I've typed since I returned from my season break has been outlandish or wrong. Talk around it all you'd like. Try taking it head on for once and see how you do.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

macbob
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#26

Regime change is easy to call for. What's harder is finding replacements that are improvements. Who are your replacements?

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#27

Regime change is easy to call for. What's harder is finding replacements that are improvements. Who are your replacements?

Originally Posted by: macbob

Type is best I can do. Aggressive, smart, well spoken, hungry, respect commanding, tough.
Mike McCarthy has run his course here. Dom has run his course. Are you really more concerned with who is next vs. taking the risk on fresh ideas? I'm not. There is no guarantee any coach, DC, is going to work out here regardless of pedigree. The thing is to try. You have no idea what plays will work or moves during a game but you have to try things to find out. I want to find out what's behind door #2.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

macbob
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#28

So, you've got nobody, just a pipe dream.

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#29

I post what I truly believe.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

No shit... unless we're using sarcasm, we all post what we truly believe. You always repeat this stupid line, like you're the only one... which is just arrogant .

I love how you say I was proven wrong as if you and the rest of this forum was certain we were making the playoffs at 4-6.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

People were certain that the Packers were going to have a winning record you verbally attacked them, suggesting they'll never wake up to reality, that they're just dreamers who can't take off their rose color glasses and dismissed them. That has been your line year after year... so yes you have clearly been proven wrong year after year... as you're the one that's not in reality.

I get it, you're a perfectionist and always have try to improve things... but it fucking sucks that you're happy when the Packers lose and pissy&bitchy when the Packers win.... and feels like crap when you dump all over the team, and having your shout box hit and runs...

You are just unable to answer and feel threatened so I must be a troll?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Threatened? WTF are you taking about... no one feels threatened... this is on the internet... no one feels threatened about going on their computers. I'm not threatened about questions I can't answer... if fact the only people I know would be threaten about that is 1) People that are about to take a test 2) Perfectionist which feel the need and desire to know the correct answers.

And I'm not even close perfectionist. But you are... so you're probably just projecting your own feelings out on that one.

Also, that would completely explain why you feel the need to ask answers like "Why did Aaron Rodgers make no Guarantees for the Playoffs?" and why you feel the need to come up with a theory for everything... and why you response to each and and every post in the past.

So thanks for the insight on yourself, and maybe you need to work on not feeling threatened by others. Also feeling threatened and being a perfectionist combo would explain a lot of your behavior on here... Sorry, I never thought about that before.

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#30

So, you've got nobody, just a pipe dream.

Originally Posted by: macbob

Yup... with the current staff, you only have one option... them.

But if you fire them all... then you have an endless amount of options. And of course who ever is making this decision is clearly going to make the right choice... and they're going to find someone CLEARLY better than the Packers current staff, because they do it all the time... find coaches who help lead teams to playoffs 8 straight years in a row, it happens all the time.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Martha Careful (7h) : I hope it is colder than a well-diggers ass on Thanksgiving night.

Zero2Cool (15h) : doubt he wants to face the speedsters

beast (15h) : Dolphins offense can be explosive... I wonder if we'll have Alexander back

Zero2Cool (17h) : No Doubs could be issue Thursday

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Bears. Santos. Blocked FG

Zero2Cool (24-Nov) : Bears. Vikings. OT

Mucky Tundra (24-Nov) : Thems the breaks I guess

Mucky Tundra (24-Nov) : Two players out and Williams had an injury designation this week but Oladapo is a healthy scratch

Zero2Cool (24-Nov) : Packers inactives vs 49ers: • CB Jaire Alexander • S Kitan Oladapo • LB Edgerrin Cooper • OL Jacob Monk

TheKanataThrilla (24-Nov) : Aaron Jones with a costly red zone fumble

Zero2Cool (24-Nov) : When we trade Malik for a 1st rounder, we'll need a new QB2.

packerfanoutwest (23-Nov) : Report: Aaron Rodgers wants to play in 2025, but not for the Jets

beast (23-Nov) : That's what I told the Police officer about my speed when he pulled me over

packerfanoutwest (23-Nov) : NFL told Bears that Packers’ blocked field goal was legal

packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : 49ers are underdogs at Packers, ending streak of 36 straight games as favorites

Zero2Cool (22-Nov) : 49ers might be down their QB, DL, TE and LT?

packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : Jaire Alexander says he has a torn PCL

Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : Even with the context it's ... what?

Mucky Tundra (20-Nov) : Matt LaFleur without context: “I don’t wanna pat you on the butt and you poop in my hand.”

beast (20-Nov) : We brought in a former Packers OL coach to help evaluate OL as a scout

beast (20-Nov) : Jets have been pretty good at picking DL

Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He landed good players thanks to high draft slot. He isn't good.

Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He can shove his knowledge up his ass. He knows nothing.

beast (20-Nov) : More knowledge, just like bring in the Jets head coach

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : What? Why? Huh?

beast (19-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers might to try to bring Douglas in through Milt Hendrickson/Ravens connections

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : The Jets fired Joe Douglas, per sources

packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Jets are a mess......

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Pretty sure Jets fired their scouting staff and just pluck former Packers.

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Jets sign Anders Carlson to their 53.

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : When you cycle the weeks, the total over remains for season. But you get your W/L for that selected week. Confusing.

packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks

packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the totals are accurate..nrvrtmind

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : I don't follow what you are saying. The totals are not the same as last week.

packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : ok so then wht are the totals the same as last week?

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : NFL Pick'em is auto updated when NFL Scores tab is clicked

Martha Careful (19-Nov) : The offense was OK. Let's not forget the Bear defense is very very good.

packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Who updates the leaderboard on NFLPickem?

beast (19-Nov) : Has the Packers offense been worse since the former Jets coach joined the Packers?

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Offense gets his ass in gear, this could be good.

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Backup QB helped with three wins. Special Teams contributed to three wins.

bboystyle (18-Nov) : Lions played outside thats why. They scored 16 and 17 in the only 2 outside games this year

Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : The rest of the NFL is catching up to Packers ... kicking is an issue throughout league

packerfanoutwest (18-Nov) : Packers DL Kenny Clark: We knew 'we were going to block' Bears' game-winning field goal attempt

Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Lions seem to be throttling everyone, but only (only) got 24 lol maybe the rain is why

Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Packers vs Lions game doesn't seem so bad.

beast (18-Nov) : Dennis Green "They are what we thought they were, and we let them off the hook!"

Martha Careful (17-Nov) : comment of the day Z2Cool "Bears better than we want to admit. Packers worse than we think. It's facts."

Mucky Tundra (17-Nov) : my worst case scenario: Bears fix their oline and get a coach like Johnson from the Lions and his scheme

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS