Cheesey
8 years ago

So many positives I'm not sure where to begin.

The running game showed some signs of life hopefully they keep that going into January. Montgomery had a few nice between the tackles runs that reinforced my believe he's got a real future at the position. What he can then do motioning him out is going to create so many mismatches, he's going to be a fantasy football beast next year. Defense coordinators are going to have to adjust their schemes or risk getting exposed with a lb or safety trying to cover him.

Adams, Jordy, and a banged up Cobb really stepped up this game. If the offense can play with that kind of efficiency they're going to be hard to beat.

Originally Posted by: isocleas2 



True. The BIG thing is if our defense can hold the other teams like they did yesterday. I have to admit, I NEVER expected a blowout!
A few lucky bounces kept the game in our favor. That, and Wilson being off target MANY times, when his guys had our guys beat. Many plays could have gone for TD's had he been on target, or his receivers NOT dropped the passes.
UserPostedImage
hardrocker950
8 years ago

True. The BIG thing is if our defense can hold the other teams like they did yesterday. I have to admit, I NEVER expected a blowout!
A few lucky bounces kept the game in our favor. That, and Wilson being off target MANY times, when his guys had our guys beat. Many plays could have gone for TD's had he been on target, or his receivers NOT dropped the passes.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Funny how I have seen so many Seahawks fans pulling the "luck" card. They must have forgotten how much luck had to go their way to win that playoff game...

Either way, lucky or skillfully - the defense took advantage of the opponent's mistakes, which is pretty much the description of their job. The biggest difference between the recent 3 games and early in the season is taking hold of opportunities on both sides of the ball. Defense had made some nice turnovers and stops and the offense is putting points on the board - and at times making it look too easy.

Only half empty glasses I can think of are the obvious, yet were far from costing us the win. I feel like the defense went into a conservative mindset earlier than most of us would want. This concerns me as we have seen them piss away leads by doing this in closer games, and that is a sad way to lose a game that is otherwise "in hand." The other obvious that has been pointed out is Starks, he looks like he is ready to hang it up - he doesn't seem to have much left in the tank.

All considered - this was a good win for us, and should really raise their confidence. Keep taking care of business and there is likely a playoff spot ahead.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
8 years ago
I was pretty disappointed in Huntley's performance. He came in with a large part of the 4th Q still to be played.I hoped we would see something that would excite us a little bit.

Granted he only had two pass attempts. Both incomplete. He seemed rushed and unsure of himself when he did drop back to pass. Even handing the ball off was not a thing of beauty

I takes more than 11 plays to really evaluate a player but since he was going the first team defense instead of the 2nd or 3rd string I was looking for a little more insight. All I came away with is that he is far from ready.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
8 years ago
While I don't get the excitement surrounding Huntley, I'm not terribly concerned with his performance. Sure, would have been nice to see him complete a few passes and look more confident, but the Packers were going full conservative to run out the clock at that point and it's a really small sample size.
steveishere
8 years ago

I was pretty disappointed in Huntley's performance. He came in with a large part of the 4th Q still to be played.I hoped we would see something that would excite us a little bit.

Granted he only had two pass attempts. Both incomplete. He seemed rushed and unsure of himself when he did drop back to pass. Even handing the ball off was not a thing of beauty

I takes more than 11 plays to really evaluate a player but since he was going the first team defense instead of the 2nd or 3rd string I was looking for a little more insight. All I came away with is that he is far from ready.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



There is a big difference between coming into a blowout and running down the clock and playing in a contested game with a gameplan/playcalls actually trying to score points. A close game or even a series where Rodgers is down or even a game Hundley gets a start is the only time you can get a real evaluation and we haven't seen him in anything like that.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
8 years ago

While I don't get the excitement surrounding Huntley, I'm not terribly concerned with his performance. Sure, would have been nice to see him complete a few passes and look more confident, but the Packers were going full conservative to run out the clock at that point and it's a really small sample size.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



It was an extremely small sample size. It was running the clock down. Nevertheless Huntley was not impressive at all. Hopefully this is a first step for feeling like he belongs out there on the field.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
8 years ago

It was an extremely small sample size. It was running the clock down. Nevertheless Huntley was not impressive at all. Hopefully this is a first step for feeling like he belongs out there on the field.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



We can both agree that he wasn't impressive at all.

I'm more likely to accept a "Run the clock out when there's still 12 minutes left" gameplan when Rodgers is on the bench, but it still makes me cringe even though we were up 4 scores. Worst-case scenario, Huntley throws a pick. If it gets down to 3 or god forbid 2 scores, then you can start playing conservative. But just get the game over with, and the best way to do that is to move the chains and take your time doing it.

Hopefully we don't need him again but if we do, I would like to see him actually run the offense. If he can't, I'd rather give Callahan some regular season snaps.
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

I was pretty disappointed in Huntley's performance.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



While I don't get the excitement surrounding Huntley,

Originally Posted by: Porforis 




UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
8 years ago

We can both agree that he wasn't impressive at all.

I'm more likely to accept a "Run the clock out when there's still 12 minutes left" gameplan when Rodgers is on the bench, but it still makes me cringe even though we were up 4 scores. Worst-case scenario, Huntley throws a pick. If it gets down to 3 or god forbid 2 scores, then you can start playing conservative. But just get the game over with, and the best way to do that is to move the chains and take your time doing it.

Hopefully we don't need him again but if we do, I would like to see him actually run the offense. If he can't, I'd rather give Callahan some regular season snaps.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



No doubt McCarthy said, if I call a pass play and you throw an INT, you will not only NEVER see the field again; but I will personally kick you in the nuts. Hundley was given a Ferrari with a few drops of gas in the tank, he wasn't going to throw any pass that could possibly be contested.

wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
8 years ago

We can both agree that he wasn't impressive at all.

I'm more likely to accept a "Run the clock out when there's still 12 minutes left" gameplan when Rodgers is on the bench, but it still makes me cringe even though we were up 4 scores. Worst-case scenario, Huntley throws a pick. If it gets down to 3 or god forbid 2 scores, then you can start playing conservative. But just get the game over with, and the best way to do that is to move the chains and take your time doing it.

Hopefully we don't need him again but if we do, I would like to see him actually run the offense. If he can't, I'd rather give Callahan some regular season snaps.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



I understand. If there was 2- 3 min to go I would have expected the duck and cover routine. With most of the 4th quarter in play I was wanting to see a little more than what we got.

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Parsons has followed Rasheed Walker on Twitter. Quite the choice
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Kuhn is a former player who works for the team, if somethings going down, he would be close to it
Mucky Tundra (2h) : @kuhnj30 Micah Freaking Parsons
Mucky Tundra (2h) : A LOT of buzz on the Bird App regarding Parsons; even Schefter is saying it's serious
dfosterf (8h) : *Orzech*
dfosterf (8h) : Orzich long snapper 3 yr extension
Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers signed someone for three year deal
Zero2Cool (9h) : lol i know it's insane ... sign up for the waiver wire then you'll know
wpr (9h) : YES!!!!!!
Mucky Tundra (9h) : WE WANT THE LIST! WE WANT THE LIST!
Zero2Cool (9h) : @JJLahey · 2m Holy crap, Packers, where the heck is the list?
Zero2Cool (9h) : haha folks on Tweeter every year this time ... 'where is list Packers!!" hahaha
wpr (10h) : He played pretty good.
Zero2Cool (10h) : NAZIR STACKHOUSE HAS MADE THE 53
Zero2Cool (11h) : NOOOOO KALEN IS GONE
Zero2Cool (11h) : Kalen King and Kamal Hadden making it. me thinks
schroeder84 (12h) : @dfosterf I suspect Elgersma WILL be hard to hide. Raw, but talented
Zero2Cool (14h) : pp.com is broken, halt testing, gotta go do work things for a bit
hardrocker950 (14h) : Mecole Hardman was released, to the surprise of few
Zero2Cool (14h) : PP.com updated. Reset Password works, and now User Profile pages are a thing
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : Soft hope plan is having fantasy football weekly on-site that i build. cannot do that with this setup.
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : It's older technology, resource hog, cannot be upgraded/changed. That's to start.
packerfanoutwest (25-Aug) : Ok, but what is wrong with this site?
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : check out packerpeople.com
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Oh crap I missed that! I thought it was a 2026 pick
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : It wasn't even next year pick, it's two years away. old dog food value
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Yep! Everytime a team trades with Howie that team is the loser (so says the media)
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : We are hosed.
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Per Schefter, GB is sending a 6th rounder for OT Darian Kennard
Zero2Cool (24-Aug) : Finally got new site to keep folks logged in. New tech is pain sometimes
dfosterf (23-Aug) : Taylor Elgersma is going to be very hard to hide.
Mucky Tundra (23-Aug) : Matthew Golden=DAWG (so load the wagons!!) !!!!!
dfosterf (18-Aug) : We do have good depth at running back imo. Still so frustrating. Bitching about it is a futile excercise, which I plan to do anyway.
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Not a surprise; inevitable
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : Brewers streak ends at 14
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : SURPRISE
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
Mucky Tundra (16-Aug) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
Martha Careful (16-Aug) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
beast (12-Aug) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
packerfanoutwest (12-Aug) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

12h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / porky88

25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

24-Aug / Around The NFL / beast

23-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

22-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Aug / Around The NFL / isaiah

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.