Packers' Adams clears protocol, will play vs. Bears· Page 2

sschind
Senior Member

8 years ago

Crazy question with Monty and Adams showing stuff tonight do we move from Nelson or ask him to restructure his contract?

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

Yup, because we all know one game is all it takes to become a stud. At least here in Packerland apparently.

blueleopard
Member

8 years ago

#12

Geez some other guy steps up and you already want to tell one of your best employees to take a paycut.

Come on guys be rational. We aren't even in a bad cap situation.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

wpr
Preferred Member

8 years ago

#13

We know Adams can play up to this level, but we also know he hasn't played consistently at his potential. It makes it so frustrating to watch him go from brilliant to mediocre. He is very athletic and seems to run decent routes (made a defender fall on a double move tonight) it just seems like he will go blank for whatever reason for games at a time.

I just can't figure him out.

Originally Posted by: coltonja

The deference is in the defense. He faced the Bares last night so he was all world. When he comes up against betters corners he doesn't have a game like he did last night. But then not many do.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

8 years ago

#14

The deference is in the defense. He faced the Bares last night so he was all world. When he comes up against betters corners he doesn't have a game like he did last night. But then not many do.

Originally Posted by: wpr

Davante has been on the up swing this year. I hope it continues.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

wpr
Preferred Member

8 years ago

#15

The deference is in the defense. He faced the Bares last night so he was all world. When he comes up against betters corners he doesn't have a game like he did last night. But then not many do.

Originally Posted by: wpr

Stupid phone changed what was supposed to be "difference " to "deference ". My apologies for not noticing.

mi_keys
Senior Member

8 years ago

#16

The deference is in the defense. He faced the Bares last night so he was all world. When he comes up against betters corners he doesn't have a game like he did last night. But then not many do.

Originally Posted by: wpr

He was atrocious against the Bears last year though...

Born and bred a cheesehead

steveishere
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#17

The deference is in the defense. He faced the Bares last night so he was all world. When he comes up against betters corners he doesn't have a game like he did last night. But then not many do.

Originally Posted by: wpr

It's not just the production though he showed skills last night we haven't consistently seen from him like adjusting to tough catches and catching the ball with a defender on him. He also made some good moves in his routes that weren't there last year. If he can play with those skills every week he probably wont go for 130 and 2 TD against good teams but he'll be an asset to the team.

wpr
Preferred Member

8 years ago

#18

Originally Posted by: steveishere

Absolutely he is an asset to the team. However very good defenders will make it a whole lot more difficult to make those tough catches or adjustments to his route. Still it is a learning process every week and Adams is coming along.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

8 years ago

#19

Geez....the guy has a GREAT game, and STILL some people want to pick him apart.
Both TD passes he made were great catches. Even the one where he was all alone, the ball was thrown low and behind him. NOT an easy catch.
When he was needed, he came through. Can't we appreciate THAT and not belittle the guy?

wpr
Preferred Member

8 years ago

#20

I guess it is against the PH.com law to say that I am glad the kid had a good game but wonder if he will have another game like that if he were to have a top CB cover him all game.

Everyone gets all butt sore if you dare imply anything less than greatness all the time.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (now) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (11m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (22m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (32m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (52m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (1h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (5h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (5h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (5h) : Packers will get in

beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (19h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS