The injury bug has officially hit the Green Bay Packers offense, specifically the backfield. This past Sunday, the Packers were without backup running back James Starks, who was ruled out with a knee injury. Starks had arthroscopic surgery on the knee and is expected to miss several weeks. Also, entering Sunday’s game against the Dallas

Continue Reading @ LombardiAve 

LombardiAve wrote:

I am sorry but I am still upset that the brain trust in GB had the audacity to try to play 16+ games with only 2 RB. They have 20 years of NFL talent evaluation experience. They know that players are going to get banged up. Ever single team needs 3 quality RBs on the roster at all times. You need a 4th RB stashed on the PS and a 5th lurking somewhere in the unemployed line.

To pretend that a WR can fill the roll on a consistent basis is plain stupid. It has been tried before and it doesn't work on a consistent basis. You can have 2,3 maybe 4 plays for a WR. You can't have the 20, 25 plays a RB needs to be effective.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

I am sorry but I am still upset that the brain trust in GB had the audacity to try to play 16+ games with only 2 RB. They have 20 years of NFL talent evaluation experience. They know that players are going to get banged up. Ever single team needs 3 quality RBs on the roster at all times. You need a 4th RB stashed on the PS and a 5th lurking somewhere in the unemployed line.

To pretend that a WR can fill the roll on a consistent basis is plain stupid. It has been tried before and it doesn't work on a consistent basis. You can have 2,3 maybe 4 plays for a WR. You can't have the 20, 25 plays a RB needs to be effective.

Originally Posted by: wpr