Zero2Cool
8 years ago
The Green Bay Packers have $163,439,289  to spend. This includes the ~$7 million from 2015 carried over into the 2016 salary cap of ~$155.27.

Yes, the numbers are funny, I do not know why.

2016 Salary Cap : $155.27
2016 Adjusted Cap: $163.44
Difference: $8.17

Yet the carry over from 2015 was something like $6.9 or so I thought.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
8 years ago
Packers have $22,806,473 to spend.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
8 years ago

Packers have $22,806,473 to spend.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



So you're saying we can players on the first day of free agency. Good to know there will be huge letdown coming.
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
8 years ago

So you're saying we can players on the first day of free agency. Good to know there will be huge letdown coming.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Dakota, We have other obligations:
The 22.8M includes a 1.2M "adjustment" that i have no idea what that's for; but assuming Spotrac is correct....

[list]
  • That # is for 51 players, when seasons starts we got to pay 53 [or more if some are on IR]. So we need to add 2 players [ERFAs Banjo and Perillo], Minus $1.3M[/list]
  • [list]
  • Gotta pay Crosby: Minus $1.9[/list]
  • [list]
  • Gotta pay the rookies: Minus $2M [/list]
  • [list]
  • Ted's gotta have $7M in bank for 2016 extensions and IR: Minus $7M[/list]

  • This leaves about $10.6M to spend on free agents or extensions of guys whose contracts expire next year!
    Zero2Cool
    8 years ago

    So you're saying we can players on the first day of free agency. Good to know there will be huge letdown coming.

    Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



    I think the Packers have a slew of free agents of the own to sign, don't they? I haven't looked recently. Even with that said, look how many failed free agent acquisitions there are that we list off every single season about the seasons prior. Why do we still clamor for players that their last team doesn't even want them?
    UserPostedImage
    Rockmolder
    8 years ago

    I think the Packers have a slew of free agents of the own to sign, don't they? I haven't looked recently. Even with that said, look how many failed free agent acquisitions there are that we list off every single season about the seasons prior. Why do we still clamor for players that their last team doesn't even want them?

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



    I feel like a lot of those guys are gone, though.

    Heyward's a given. So is James Jones.

    Perry will get a bigger offer from some other team, based on his potential and the way he played last season when healthy. Add to that that he very much prefered to play for a 4-3 team coming out of college and his durability problems and I can imagine that letting him go would be benificial for both sides.

    If Raji does come back, I think he'll have to settle for even less than he got last year. He took the prove-it deal and didn't prove all that much. Also, with Guion signed for another three years, Pennel on the roster and Raji being 30 when the season starts, I can imagine him being the odd man out.

    Neal might be back, but I hope it'll be on a better contract than the last one. He's not very good at anything, just decent at a whole lot of things. If he doesn't take a $2.5 million deal, you can safely part ways with him the amount of guys we have under contract at OLB and the draft still coming up.

    That leaves you some room to work with. Especially if you consider that Peppers' $10,5 million will be off the books next year, which gives you some breathing room to work some money into the 2017 season. Josh Sitton and TJ Lang both are in the last year of their contracts and carrying a pretty big cap number for a pair of guards. Extending them or having either one go in FA next year gives you some more 2017 wiggling room. Lastly, this might be the time to look at a restructering for Rodgers if he and McCarthy truly want to step into the FA market. Unlikely, but he's at or above $20 million for the next four years.

    That's a lot of what-if's, though, and I agree with Barfarn that you can't go and hang against the cap ceiling. That generally doesn't work all too well. I do think that there's some room for spending, though. A guy like Malik Jackson is far out of reach and not worth putting yourself in cap hell for, but getting a guy like Damon Harrison on around $5 per year or Trevathan at around that same price.

    Again, wishful thinking, but McCarthy promising to surprise us has me believing just a little bit.
    Zero2Cool
    8 years ago

    Again, wishful thinking, but McCarthy promising to surprise us has me believing just a little bit.

    Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



    When did Mike McCarthy McCarthy promise to surprise us?

    “We might shock you this year.” is what I read from McCarthy and that's not a promise in my view.

    Sorry if that just killed the glimmer of hope you may have had, lol.
    UserPostedImage
    Rockmolder
    8 years ago

    When did Mike McCarthy McCarthy promise to surprise us?

    “We might shock you this year.” is what I read from McCarthy and that's not a promise in my view.

    Sorry if that just killed the glimmer of hope you may have had, lol.

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



    Yeah, my wording was a bit too strong there.

    Saying "We might shock you this year", only to come out and take their annual one month vacation to start off the new season would be a bit of a dick move on their part, though.
    steveishere
    8 years ago
    They do have some money to work with but keep in mind they need to sign the up coming rookie class and that 7m/y they rolled over is only good for 1 season if you use it. You can't use it to say you can afford to pay someone a 3 year deal averaging 7m because the next season it's gone.
    Wade
    • Wade
    • Veteran Member
    8 years ago

    They do have some money to work with but keep in mind they need to sign the up coming rookie class and that 7m/y they rolled over is only good for 1 season if you use it. You can't use it to say you can afford to pay someone a 3 year deal averaging 7m because the next season it's gone.

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 




    You can use it to help front load a contract/increase the first year guarantee, though, both things smart free agents value.

    And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
    Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (2h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (13h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (13h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (16h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (16h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (17h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (19h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (19h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (19h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (19h) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (19h) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (19h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (19h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (19h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (21h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (21h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (21h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (21h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (22h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (22h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (22h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (23h) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (23h) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (23h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (23h) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (23h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    8h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

    12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.