DakotaT
8 years ago

There's absolutely not enough time to monitor every player's diet especially in the offseason. I'm sure they do what they can.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules 



Maybe just start with the fat ones.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
8 years ago
I don't know how much they can actually keep an eye on every player in the off season.

I hope Lacy learned from this and will keep himself in shape from now on. He has too much talent too waste it .
UserPostedImage
Laser Gunns
8 years ago
I may be in the minority, but I really like Lacy (when in shape), and would much rather the Pack get him going then relive the Alex Green/Vernand Morency/Deshawn Wynn/Cedric Benson/Dajuan Harris/James Starks days.

That Alabama RB this year looks nice though.

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
nerdmann
8 years ago

Interesting take... other than the fact the due to the CBA, teams can only have very limited contact with the players in the offseason and even in season.

Do you schedule the team plans/drills around the majority of the team who correctly do their job of staying in shape? Or do you focus in on the slackers who fail to stay in shape, while the guys that did their job in the first place just wait around and do nothing new?

Originally Posted by: beast 



That's true, there is limited MANDATORY practices. However, players are free to show up and work out as I understand it. Not only that, they're free to get advice and workout programs from their training staff.

Unless you know, they think P90X is better. 😂
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
8 years ago

That's true, there is limited MANDATORY practices. However, players are free to show up and work out as I understand it. Not only that, they're free to get advice and workout programs from their training staff.

Unless you know, they think P90X is better. 😂

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



And that's where your logic completely falls apart... because the other players were able to do it... and Lacy failed... that's on Lacy, not the training staff.

And Lacy probably knows, that personal instructors are better for him, because he's proven that he's too fucking lazy to stay in shape without them... again, that's on Lacy, not the staff. Hell that might be more Alabama staff than Packers staff, as another former Bama RB has pointed out , that Bama treats their players like boys, "having everything like at Alabama where it was so structured", to adjusting to suddenly being treated like a man "in the NFL, [where] everything’s on your own". Bama might talented players, but you also might have to watch for them getting lazy once they get to the pros.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
8 years ago

And that's where your logic completely falls apart... because the other players were able to do it... and Lacy failed... that's on Lacy, not the training staff.

And Lacy probably knows, that personal instructors are better for him, because he's proven that he's too fucking lazy to stay in shape without them... again, that's on Lacy, not the staff. Hell that might be more Alabama staff than Packers staff, as another former Bama RB has pointed out , that Bama treats their players like boys, "having everything like at Alabama where it was so structured", to adjusting to suddenly being treated like a man "in the NFL, [where] everything’s on your own". Bama might talented players, but you also might have to watch for them getting lazy once they get to the pros.

Originally Posted by: beast 



What does using the informercial guy instead of professional athletic trainers have to do with laziness? Are you saying the Packers are unwilling to work with Eddie? Because I'll bet they are.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
8 years ago

What does using the informercial guy instead of professional athletic trainers have to do with laziness? Are you saying the Packers are unwilling to work with Eddie? Because I'll bet they are.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



The Packers probably have 1 professional athletic trainer for every 4 players at best... for a lazy person that doesn't work well enough, as they need a better ratio... so Lacy smartly went out and got a better ratio, 4 professional athletic trainers for 1 player...

UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
8 years ago

I may be in the minority, but I really like Lacy (when in shape), and would much rather the Pack get him going then relive the Alex Green/Vernand Morency/Deshawn Wynn/Cedric Benson/Dajuan Harris/James Starks days.

That Alabama RB this year looks nice though.

Originally Posted by: Laser Gunns 



We all like Lacy when he's in shape, but isn't that what this thread is about.

The people in this forum need to know the difference between criticism in hatred. I think 90% of the posters in this forum think they are the same thing.
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
8 years ago

The Packers probably have 1 professional athletic trainer for every 4 players at best... for a lazy person that doesn't work well enough, as they need a better ratio... so Lacy smartly went out and got a better ratio, 4 professional athletic trainers for 1 player...

UserPostedImage

Originally Posted by: beast 



Well Tony just came out with a new fitness routine, so this is good press for him as well.

https://www.beachbody.com/product/fitness_programs/22-minute-hard-corps-workout.do?ch=flx&code=FLX_110_22HC 
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Zero2Cool
8 years ago
When do we start being concerned about Eddie Lacy being too thin?

UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (23m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (24m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (24m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (31m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (32m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (53m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.