I'd like to know if Packers' fans think the Packers overachieved (given all the injuries and flux), underachieved (because they were pre-season Super Bowl favorites), or achieved just about what they should have achieved?

I think this was a really, really weird year, and have not concluded how I feel about it as yet.

Even considering the injuries, they under achieved. And that lies on the Head Coach and GM.

---

i believe they under achieved. Just watch how the patriots throw there way down the field. quick slants, quick ins and outs, which will force defenses into zone coverage which is what the packers are very good at beating. The coach seems willing to let his qb just wing it. I think a bit more thought into how to beat man coverage would have been helpful.

But what do i know i'm just an unfrozen caveman truck driver.Your human ways confuse and scare me!

Underachieved... Aaron Rodgers led the 23rd ranked offense...and the 25th ranked passing offense?

That's bottom tier offense. We're down with Tennessee (rookie who was injured, too), Dallas (with backup QB's), Buffalo (Tyrod Taylor), SF (Kaepernick under Tomsula), KC (Alex Smith), Minnesota (Teddy B.), and the St. Louis Rams (Foles/Keenum).

For as much as Jay Cutler gets cited as we could have him instead and a proud laugh is belted out...his offense was better than ours and he lost Brandon Marshall and didn't have Jeffery for most of this season...and Marty B. was hurt as well as Forte. They were STILL better than our Aaron Rodgers led offense. Think about that.

No way we overachieved this year... our highest ranked unit was our middling D at 15th.

Now, did we go further than we should have? Absolutely. That was a function of facing one of the biggest jokes ever as a playoff team, the Skins, and a tight Cardinals team who featured a QB who'd never won a playoff game.

---

Underachieved. Injuries didn't help, but this offense just looked horrendous at times this year. Zero excuses for that.