Keep in mind that Bob McGinn is also the same guy who said Ted Thompson assembled such a solid team around Aaron Rodgers that it would be a playoff team even with Rodgers.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Trading for Vernon Davis would have been a sign to the team that the management is trying to improve the roster.

Originally Posted by: MintBaconDrivel 

So it doesn't matter if he actually improves the roster or not, just that he tries.

Originally Posted by: sschind 

Bob McGinn has a case of the "ESPN" syndrom.

He would rather try and create news instead of reporting the news.

Hey Bob, if your ideas were so Damn good you would be a GM!

Write about what you know, not what you think you know.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 

When it is a move that makes sense for the teams needs at that time.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 

No is actually worse for the team to "make moves" that don't actually help even if they make sense at the time.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 

Only if you assume the move would make the team worse. Not the same as not helping.

Vernon davis might not have been the answer but it is doubtful getting him cheap would hurt the team. When there is a noticeable deficiency at a position and a player available cheap, even if the move doesn't win us a SB, it is better than not trying.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 

Throw enough shit at the wall and some of it is bound to stick.

I was going to say crap but with Nerd being gone all week I thought I'd help reach our quota of the word shit. If every registered user would make a thread using the word at least 2 times I think we could come close.

Originally Posted by: sschind