Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
9 years ago
There have been a few, a very select few who believe Scott Tolzien can’t play as well as AR did over the last 6 games. Stop. Just stop it.😂

In 1st Det game. From the 17 GB dinked and dunked their way to Det 26 to a 3rd and 3. AR perfect executed an unstoppable game plan perfectly and not a single throw over 6 yards. Now please point out which one of those throws Tolzein couldn’t make?

On 3rd and 3 Det. rushes 3. AR has Cobb, Rodgers, Jones that can all be thrown open for 1st; AR has all day and could wait for Starks to come open covered by LB on left; he could have waited for Cobb, Rodgers and Jones to make a second move; he could have easily run for the 3 yards; but instead AR leaves the game plan and goes for TD to Adams. A perfect 30 yard laser throw is required, a throw AR can make especially with no pressure. Tolzein can’t make this throw! But guess what? AR didn’t make the throw either. And a long FG is tried.

Tolzein couldn’t make the throw; but he wouldn’t have even tried because he knows his limitations and Tolzein would have gotten the first down, either by running throwing a guy open or waiting for second moves.

This is not speculation because we have what Tolzein did in 2013 and can project adding 2 solid preseasons and his becoming 2more years familiar w/ the playbook. In 2013, He signed as 3rd string right before first game so he had no time to learn the playbook and probably didn’t get a single snap with first team until AR went out w/ collar bone injury. Then probably all the first 1st team snaps went to get Wallace ready. Tolzein got starts in NYG and Minn. He should be evaluated on only those pass plays that were scripted and this will give us idea of how he would perform today [only better because he has 2 full years in the system].

In the first half in NY: Tolzein was 7-10 for 131 [P-Rating =112]. Running: GB was 9-13. His OL rookie Baktieri, Sitton, EDS, Lang, Newhouse!

In Minn. Audie Cole cane through A gap untouched on 1st play of game for 7 yard sack, killing first drive [a 3 and out]. On second drive a beautiful 11 play 87 yard drive 5 1st downs, 3 passing, 2 by run [one by Tolzein] capped by Tolzein running 6 yards into EZ.

Tolzein knew very little of playbook. The small part he knew, and did not know that with 100% proficiency, this is what he did.

After 2 very good preseaons and 2 years in playbook; if you think that Tolzein cant run this offense better than AR over the past 6 weeks, you’re a...you’re a...well, you’re a fan and entitled to that baseless, factless and feckless opinion. And know if any tries to take that opinion from you, I will fight them! You are entitled to that Opinion as well as having a sphincter.

Think about this: Flynn played darn good in this system; and totally sucked in several other stops. Seneca Wallace in his only start was perfect 5-5-25 and playing within gameplan drove 9 plays 44 yards and drive stalled only after he got hurt and Crosby missed a FG. AR has missed several games numerous times with injury; until last year; he wont come out now when injured. Maybe, just maybe, AR isn’t as good as some think and maybe AR knows Tolzein’s performance would expose this.
OlHoss1884
9 years ago
You're talking about Tolzien being ready to run out on the field and grab the kicking tee, right?
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits" --Albert Einstein
blueleopard
9 years ago
I know this is a forum and I appreciate the time you made to that post, but from one honest Packers fan to another -- this is a horribly written post. If what you said was written on paper, I'd red pen the shit out of it.

In regards to your opinion of Scott Tolzien leading the offense better than Aaron Rodgers over the past six weeks, just stop.

I'm a Tolzien fan that has watched him from Wisconsin to San Francisco to now. He's gotten better every year, and under McCarthy he will definitely be trade fodder, but he's not going to lead this offense better than Aaron Rodgers.

Why you'd even bother writing this post after a win that ONLY Rodgers could've orchestrated the way he did is beyond me. The stats you threw out are pointless and laughable. You might as well have recommended Brett Hundley for snaps considering he had the highest passer rating of all the QB's with more than 30 snaps over the pre-season.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
nerdmann
9 years ago

I know this is a forum and I appreciate the time you made to that post, but from one honest Packers fan to another -- this is a horribly written post. If what you said was written on paper, I'd red pen the shit out of it.

In regards to your opinion of Scott Tolzien leading the offense better than Aaron Rodgers over the past six weeks, just stop.

I'm a Tolzien fan that has watched him from Wisconsin to San Francisco to now. He's gotten better every year, and under McCarthy he will definitely be trade fodder, but he's not going to lead this offense better than Aaron Rodgers.

Why you'd even bother writing this post after a win that ONLY Rodgers could've orchestrated the way he did is beyond me. The stats you threw out are pointless and laughable. You might as well have recommended Brett Hundley for snaps considering he had the highest passer rating of all the QB's with more than 30 snaps over the pre-season.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 



The presumption is that Scott would play within the system and not get us down by 20 through stat whoring in the first place.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
9 years ago
Sorry to be so petty, but golly if you can't even get his name right, how and why should anyone trust you know he's "ready"?

UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
9 years ago

I know this is a forum and I appreciate the time you made to that post, but from one honest Packers fan to another -- this is a horribly written post. If what you said was written on paper, I'd red pen the shit out of it.

In regards to your opinion of Scott Tolzien leading the offense better than Aaron Rodgers over the past six weeks, just stop.

I'm a Tolzien fan that has watched him from Wisconsin to San Francisco to now. He's gotten better every year, and under McCarthy he will definitely be trade fodder, but he's not going to lead this offense better than Aaron Rodgers.

Why you'd even bother writing this post after a win that ONLY Rodgers could've orchestrated the way he did is beyond me. The stats you threw out are pointless and laughable. You might as well have recommended Brett Hundley for snaps considering he had the highest passer rating of all the QB's with more than 30 snaps over the pre-season.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 



Eye is sorry eye nots be as edumacated as you
Yuse classless words to makes one feels so sad and blue [Leopard]
-Dostoyevsky😂

This of course is a logic error: ad hominem [purport to argue against an idea by attacking writing abilities rather than the idea]

Another logic error, Strawman: The premise of the argument is that Tolzein could perform better than AR over the last 6 games. You then convert the argument to comparing their respective abilities to play in a specific 1.5 quarter time period. A 1.5 quarter time period where the game plan was set aside because the game was substantially over and throwing caution to the wind was the ONLY road to victory.

Count 2-Strawman: Hundley? A powerful FACT in support of the premise was Tolzein's amazing play V. NFL players, not in garbage time, given that he knew a sliver of the playbook and practiced less than that and the FACT that since, he's had 2 full years in the system.

The introduction of Hundley is sardonic and the last refuge of the defeated wit is sarcasm [This really was Dostoyevsky from "The idiot"].

Dostoyevsky's "The Idiot" actually is a brilliant portrayal of man's ability to allow emotion to over rule reason and the tools they employ to protect those metal products emotionally derived at [damn ended that sentence in a preposition]. It is recommended reading for every Packer fan.

Please, let's talk football, if an idea is unworthy, then counter arguments can be made, there's no need to be nasty or dishonest in argument, even if that dishonesty and nasty is self-thought to be well written 😂.
Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
9 years ago

Sorry to be so petty, but golly if you can't even get his name right, how and why should anyone trust you know he's "ready

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Finally we agree: Yes that was pretty petty. 😝

buckeyepackfan
9 years ago
What scares me about this topic, I remember in 2012 Bob Mcguin writing an article about how The Packers could win without Aaron Rodgers.

Personally, I don't want history repeating itself.

I will just say Scott Tolzien is as ready as he physically can be and let's hope we never find out this year what level he is at.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
nerdmann
9 years ago

What scares me about this topic, I remember in 2012 Bob Mcguin writing an article about how The Packers could win without Aaron Rodgers.

Personally, I don't want history repeating itself.

I will just say Scott Tolzien is as ready as he physically can be and let's hope we never find out this year what level he is at.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



That depends on whether Aaron's ready to pull his head out.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
DoddPower
9 years ago
I'll be impressed if Tolzien even nets any kind of draft pick in a trade. I doubt it. The Packers would have likely taken an offer this season with the addition of Hundley if one occurred. He's an average career backup, at best. Regardless if one thinks that Tolzien could have played as well (or as poorly) as Aaron Rodgers has for parts of this season, he's not as good of a QB and that's the bigger point. Rodgers will play through his issues and return to form. Tolzien will always be an average backup. Any sane coach would stick with his star and hope for improvement. Actually, a really good coaching staff would force the issue and find ways to correct the problems.
Fan Shout
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.