nerdmann
9 years ago

Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers threw three touchdown passes and no interceptions in Sunday's win at Chicago, giving him a career total of 229 touchdowns and 57 interceptions. Anyone who follows football knows that's phenomenal. But it's worth pointing out just how phenomenal that really is: Rodgers now has more than four times as many touchdowns...

Continue Reading @ Michael David Smith 

Michael David Smith wrote:



Is it just me or does this come across as a HUGE jinx?

Anyway, Aaron does stat whore and hold onto the ball and all that, but his WR are KNOWN for not getting separation. I've mentioned it elsewhere. Dude has to put it in a 6 inch hole at 40 yards. And he does it.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
DakotaT
9 years ago

Is it just me or does this come across as a HUGE jinx?

Anyway, Aaron does stat whore and hold onto the ball and all that, but his WR are KNOWN for not getting separation. I've mentioned it elsewhere. Dude has to put it in a 6 inch hole at 40 yards. And he does it.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Just think if he had Atlanta's receivers, what he could do?

UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

Just think if he had Atlanta's receivers, what he could do?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



They traded their whole draft for Julio.

Besides, IMO I don't think Mike schemes to get guys open. He's not trying to outsmart OCs.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
gbguy20
9 years ago
His numbers are absolutely astonishing. Lets add to the rings now
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
DakotaT
9 years ago

His numbers are absolutely astonishing. Lets add to the rings now

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



With our defense?

I keep hearing this embarrassment of riches BS about our receiving corp, but I just don't see that on the field. They don't get separation from the DB's, and if we had an average QB, we'd be in deep shit. Rodgers makes these guys a lot better than they are. Favre did that the same.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
9 years ago

They don't get separation from the DB's, and if we had an average QB, we'd be in deep shit.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



There's a reason why teams with average QBs don't tend to make the playoffs. And it's not because those teams just happen to have WRs that don't get separation.
DakotaT
9 years ago

There's a reason why teams with average QBs don't tend to make the playoffs. And it's not because those teams just happen to have WRs that don't get separation.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



My point in all these receiver conversations is why the hell can't our GM go get us an elite receiver to make Rodger's job easier? A team with a stacked secondary can make Rodgers look average because we don't have that absolute difference maker. It's a piece to the puzzle we should already have in place. Very frustrating to keep watching the same complacency.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
9 years ago

My point in all these receiver conversations is why the hell can't our GM go get us an elite receiver to make Rodger's job easier? A team with a stacked secondary can make Rodgers look average because we don't have that absolute difference maker. It's a piece to the puzzle we should already have in place. Very frustrating to keep watching the same complacency.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



The Packers receiving core has always been just fine during Rodgers tenure. All the Packers need is a defense.
mi_keys
9 years ago
Amongst wide receivers last year, Cobb was fourth in yards after the catch and Nelson was seventh. I doubt that would be the case if they were never getting separation.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Rockmolder
9 years ago

My point in all these receiver conversations is why the hell can't our GM go get us an elite receiver to make Rodger's job easier? A team with a stacked secondary can make Rodgers look average because we don't have that absolute difference maker. It's a piece to the puzzle we should already have in place. Very frustrating to keep watching the same complacency.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



I used to bang this drum a year or three ago, but Jordy Nelson's emergence made me shut up about it.

Still, I agree with you. Think about what this Offense could do if we had a guy like Bryant, Beckham, Green, Cooper or Jones... It wouldn't just give Rodgers a weapon the likes he's never had, but it shifts coverage to one side of the field and calls for double coverage and safeties helping over the top. It improves your entire receiving group.

The only problem with that is that those athletic freaks are generally gone when we're drafting, combined with the fact that our FO doesn't seem to have high positional value on WR (in the draft). Those five guys I mentioned were all drafted with top 12 picks, apart from Dez who droppe due to character issues.

Still, it would be rather amazing to see Rodgers play with a guy like that.

Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (1h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (1h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (3h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (3h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (4h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (4h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (4h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (4h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (4h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (5h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (5h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (5h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (5h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (6h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (6h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (6h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (6h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (7h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (7h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (8h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (9h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (9h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (10h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (10h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (10h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (10h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (10h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (10h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (10h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (10h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (10h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (10h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (10h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (10h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (10h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (10h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (10h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (10h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (11h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.