Aaron Rodgers reaches a historic touchdown-interception milestone· Page 2

Rockmolder
Honored Member

9 years ago

#11

And did anyone catch this? Amazing to see how hard he is on himself when he doesn't do something perfectly.

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#12

Is it just me or does this come across as a HUGE jinx?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

We are also all alone at #1 in the NFC North.😎

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

9 years ago

#13

And did anyone catch this? Amazing to see how hard he is on himself when he doesn't do something perfectly.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder

I think it was more so a missed opportunity to put the Bears away that he was frustrated with more so than being hard on himself.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

#14

It wasn't out WR corps that cost us the SB last year.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

DoddPower
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#15

I used to bang this drum a year or three ago, but Jordy Nelson's emergence made me shut up about it.

Still, I agree with you. Think about what this Offense could do if we had a guy like Bryant, Beckham, Green, Cooper or Jones... It wouldn't just give Rodgers a weapon the likes he's never had, but it shifts coverage to one side of the field and calls for double coverage and safeties helping over the top. It improves your entire receiving group.

The only problem with that is that those athletic freaks are generally gone when we're drafting, combined with the fact that our FO doesn't seem to have high positional value on WR (in the draft). Those five guys I mentioned were all drafted with top 12 picks, apart from Dez who droppe due to character issues.

Still, it would be rather amazing to see Rodgers play with a guy like that.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder

I get what you are saying and of course it would be nice to have more "elite" receivers. But I still maintain that defense is the much bigger priority. The Packers would be the consensus Super Bowl favorite every season if they consistently have a good-to-very good defense, even with this receiving core. That's the advantage that Rodgers give you.

With this defense, it would be hard to win a Super Bowl even with a Julio Jones on this team. It would put pressure on the offense to score EVERY SINGLE DRIVE.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

9 years ago

#16

Just think if he had Atlanta's receivers, what he could do?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

... nothing else to add ...

Cheesey
Preferred Member

9 years ago

#17

Also, there is just so much cap space money wise. You can't just go out and pay one guy the farm and have enough left over to field the rest of the team.
And was already said, it's our DEFENSE that needs some drastic upgrades.
Sam Shields to me looked totally lost out there. He was a constant screw up. Think the Seahawks arn't seeing that on tape right now and licking their chops? Plus the fact that we could'nt stop the run.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

#18

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

Shields had a bad game. He's not a shitty player.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

DakotaT
Select Member

9 years ago

#19

... nothing else to add ...

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Too many simpletons and conformists in this forum, but that's okay, we have lots of division championships to celebrate. Thanks Uncle Ted for keeping us competitive, and never going all in! 🙄

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

9 years ago

#20

Too many simpletons and conformists in this forum, but that's okay, we have lots of division championships to celebrate. Thanks Uncle Ted for keeping us competitive, and never going all in! 🙄

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Zip it dude, we know you're wearing your damn 2014 NFC North Championship t-shirt right now!!!

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (40m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (40m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (40m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (48m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (49m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS