uffda udfa
10 years ago

And once again Uffda has hijacked another thread to stroke his own ego and talk negative about The Green Bay Packers.

HEY UFFDA THERE IS A NEW THREAD STARTED SBOUT TED THOMPSONS SUCCESS, HURRY HURRY HURRY , YOU DON'T WANT REAL PACKER FANS TO DOMINATE IT TOO LONG!



Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



If "REAL"= out of touch with reality, then you're right...I'm not a real fan. I'm objective...I look at them as I do teams I'm not a fan of while being a fan. It is more fun your way but much less "real".




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


buckeyepackfan
10 years ago

If "REAL"= out of touch with reality, then you're right...I'm not a real fan. I'm objective...I look at them as I do teams I'm not a fan of while being a fan. It is more fun your way but much less "real".



Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Hey IT'S. ALL ABOUT YOU!

They should rename this forum

Allaboutuffda.com!

🤣 😂 😂 😂 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 🤣



I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Hey IT'S. ALL ABOUT YOU!

They should rename this forum

Allaboutuffda.com!

🤣 😂 😂 😂 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 🤣


Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



It's never been about me. My opinions are strong and conflict with yours. Sorry. Z should create a sub forum called: Objective Packers fans. I would promise never to come visit Kool aid land if he did that. You and I would never cross paths again and for that I would feel a tremendous void.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


voiceofreason
10 years ago
TE will most likely be our weakest position on offense, but only because we are so stacked at every other offensive position. Our TE's are serviceable. RR has potential.
blank
Zero2Cool
10 years ago

TE will most likely be our weakest position on offense, but only because we are so stacked at every other offensive position. Our TE's are serviceable. RR has potential.

Originally Posted by: voiceofreason 



It will be our least strength that's for sure. Saying it's a weakness would imply there are many. That I don't believe to be true.
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
10 years ago
Cobb’s measurables are categorically pedestrian: 5’10” 19; 4.55/2.66/1.60; bench 16; vert 33.5; jump 9’7”; shuttle 4.34; cone 7.08; But his measure as a man on a 1-100 scale: 120!!!!! Cobb does not get open because of his measurables; he gets open because he’s a man/good football player.

RRodgers is the exact same guy as Cobb right down to the core! And he will definitely be a better route runner than Finley, which means he’ll get open when Finley could not, thus making him a more dangerous receiver than Finley. He’ll get his opportunities to get deep and he won’t drop the ball like Finley did.

If one looks at where Rodgers was at week 1 and then week 20 it bodes well for his future; here’s some of his play in Champ game:

1st Q 10:28 1st 10; GB is in 2x2 4 wr set and Rodgers about 3 yards off Bakhtiari’s left shoulder. Hawks were playing 4 man rush; on Packers left Wright and Maxwell were playing a short-deep zone on Cobb and Adams; Sherman and Lane were playing Nelson and Boykin man on right side; Wagner was man up on Rodgers and 2 safeties played deep halves. Rodgers ran his route right at Wagner gave him the slightest look left and as soon as Wagner shifted his weight; Rodgers cut to middle. Wagner is the absolute best MLB cover guy in NFL and arguably he’s one of the best all time. And Rodgers sensed the perfect moment to cut to the middle and he had 6 yards separation-SIX YARDS and caught the ball for a 12 yard gain!!!! Wagner’s jock was so faked it ended up around his ankles. Now if Finley or Janis ran that route they may have gotten 1-2 yards separation at best; because their route running instincts are nothing like Rodgers’. That is an effing studly quick twitch. Separation is not about speed; it is about timing and feel for when the cover dude is off balance.

1:28 1st 10; RR caught one for 11 yards in middle; but Hawks got caught in zone blitz and Schofield looked awkward trying to drop into his short zone were RR caught the ball. Anyone, my grandma or the 53 YO Ed West would have easily been open for this catch.

:06 2nd at 5; Cobb was wide open in Endzone for TD. Remember Janis looking obvious for a sure penalty trying to put a rub on a LB; it was Rodgers that masterfully rubbed [out] Thomas to get Cobb wiiiiiide open. And after the play Chancellor approached Rodgers. Rodgers put his hands on Chancellor’s shoulders taking control of the situation like a daddy telling his young son about the birds and bees; A rookie psychologically dominating a perennial all pro vet like Chancellor-amazing. Kinda like he way Nerd, Buckeye, GB guy and GreenGold dominate UU.

2nd Q :56 2nd and 15 – Rodgers lined up wide left, guarded man by KJ Wright, one of the best if not the best cover OLB in NFL, about 6 yards off LOS. Rodgers charges up field pressures Wright to begin back peddle and runs a perfect 1 line stick/curl. He had 3-4 yards of separation on Wright.

4th Q 12:41 3rd and 7- Rodgers lines up right about 5 yards off Bulaga. Wagner blitzes and Rodgers becomes the hot read and slants across the middle in the spot vacated by Wagner. If he runs the slant too shallow he don’t get 1st, if he runs it too deep, the S can defend the play. But Rodgers ran it perfectly, exactly 7 yards. He got smacked by Chancellor and held onto the important 1st down. Oh and Rodgers was Wonderlic enough to know he was the hot read and Wonderlic enough to recognize the blitz; something that Janis was not Wonderlic enough to do in preseason [or practice given he never got to play].

:30 2nd 10- Rodgers wide right w/ Chancellor covering him man. Rodgers had a combo route; AR threw a back shoulder and Rich wasn’t ready for one. This was definitely Rodgers’ fault...LOL, but seeing that Chancellor had Rich blanketed on top; Rich was the one who probably misread the situation.
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Cobb’s measurables are categorically pedestrian: 5’10” 19; 4.55/2.66/1.60; bench 16; vert 33.5; jump 9’7”; shuttle 4.34; cone 7.08; But his measure as a man on a 1-100 scale: 120!!!!! Cobb does not get open because of his measurables; he gets open because he’s a man/good football player.

RRodgers is the exact same guy as Cobb right down to the core! And he will definitely be a better route runner than Finley, which means he’ll get open when Finley could not, thus making him a more dangerous receiver than Finley. He’ll get his opportunities to get deep and he won’t drop the ball like Finley did.

If one looks at where Rodgers was at week 1 and then week 20 it bodes well for his future; here’s some of his play in Champ game:

1st Q 10:28 1st 10; GB is in 2x2 4 wr set and Rodgers about 3 yards off Bakhtiari’s left shoulder. Hawks were playing 4 man rush; on Packers left Wright and Maxwell were playing a short-deep zone on Cobb and Adams; Sherman and Lane were playing Nelson and Boykin man on right side; Wagner was man up on Rodgers and 2 safeties played deep halves. Rodgers ran his route right at Wagner gave him the slightest look left and as soon as Wagner shifted his weight; Rodgers cut to middle. Wagner is the absolute best MLB cover guy in NFL and arguably he’s one of the best all time. And Rodgers sensed the perfect moment to cut to the middle and he had 6 yards separation-SIX YARDS and caught the ball for a 12 yard gain!!!! Wagner’s jock was so faked it ended up around his ankles. Now if Finley or Janis ran that route they may have gotten 1-2 yards separation at best; because their route running instincts are nothing like Rodgers’. That is an effing studly quick twitch. Separation is not about speed; it is about timing and feel for when the cover dude is off balance.

1:28 1st 10; RR caught one for 11 yards in middle; but Hawks got caught in zone blitz and Schofield looked awkward trying to drop into his short zone were RR caught the ball. Anyone, my grandma or the 53 YO Ed West would have easily been open for this catch.

:06 2nd at 5; Cobb was wide open in Endzone for TD. Remember Janis looking obvious for a sure penalty trying to put a rub on a LB; it was Rodgers that masterfully rubbed [out] Thomas to get Cobb wiiiiiide open. And after the play Chancellor approached Rodgers. Rodgers put his hands on Chancellor’s shoulders taking control of the situation like a daddy telling his young son about the birds and bees; A rookie psychologically dominating a perennial all pro vet like Chancellor-amazing. Kinda like he way Nerd, Buckeye, GB guy and GreenGold dominate UU.

2nd Q :56 2nd and 15 – Rodgers lined up wide left, guarded man by KJ Wright, one of the best if not the best cover OLB in NFL, about 6 yards off LOS. Rodgers charges up field pressures Wright to begin back peddle and runs a perfect 1 line stick/curl. He had 3-4 yards of separation on Wright.

4th Q 12:41 3rd and 7- Rodgers lines up right about 5 yards off Bulaga. Wagner blitzes and Rodgers becomes the hot read and slants across the middle in the spot vacated by Wagner. If he runs the slant too shallow he don’t get 1st, if he runs it too deep, the S can defend the play. But Rodgers ran it perfectly, exactly 7 yards. He got smacked by Chancellor and held onto the important 1st down. Oh and Rodgers was Wonderlic enough to know he was the hot read and Wonderlic enough to recognize the blitz; something that Janis was not Wonderlic enough to do in preseason [or practice given he never got to play].

:30 2nd 10- Rodgers wide right w/ Chancellor covering him man. Rodgers had a combo route; Aaron Rodgers threw a back shoulder and Rich wasn’t ready for one. This was definitely Rodgers’ fault...LOL, but seeing that Chancellor had Rich blanketed on top; Rich was the one who probably misread the situation.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



It's hard enough taking some of this stuff seriously but when you post Randall's 40 time as 4.55 when he's a 4.46 combine guy you really lose credibility.

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/randall-cobb?id=2495448 
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Barfarn
10 years ago

Cobb’s measurables are categorically pedestrian: 5’10” 19; 4.55/2.66/1.60; bench 16; vert 33.5; jump 9’7”; shuttle 4.34; cone 7.08; But his measure as a man on a 1-100 scale: 120!!!!! Cobb does not get open because of his measurables; he gets open because he’s a man/good football player.

RRodgers is the exact same guy as Cobb right down to the core! And he will definitely be a better route runner than Finley, which means he’ll get open when Finley could not, thus making him a more dangerous receiver than Finley. He’ll get his opportunities to get deep and he won’t drop the ball like Finley did.

If one looks at where Rodgers was at week 1 and then week 20 it bodes well for his future; here’s some of his play in Champ game:

1st Q 10:28 1st 10; GB is in 2x2 4 wr set and Rodgers about 3 yards off Bakhtiari’s left shoulder. Hawks were playing 4 man rush; on Packers left Wright and Maxwell were playing a short-deep zone on Cobb and Adams; Sherman and Lane were playing Nelson and Boykin man on right side; Wagner was man up on Rodgers and 2 safeties played deep halves. Rodgers ran his route right at Wagner gave him the slightest look left and as soon as Wagner shifted his weight; Rodgers cut to middle. Wagner is the absolute best MLB cover guy in NFL and arguably he’s one of the best all time. And Rodgers sensed the perfect moment to cut to the middle and he had 6 yards separation-SIX YARDS and caught the ball for a 12 yard gain!!!! Wagner’s jock was so faked it ended up around his ankles. Now if Finley or Janis ran that route they may have gotten 1-2 yards separation at best; because their route running instincts are nothing like Rodgers’. That is an effing studly quick twitch. Separation is not about speed; it is about timing and feel for when the cover dude is off balance.

1:28 1st 10; RR caught one for 11 yards in middle; but Hawks got caught in zone blitz and Schofield looked awkward trying to drop into his short zone were RR caught the ball. Anyone, my grandma or the 53 YO Ed West would have easily been open for this catch.

:06 2nd at 5; Cobb was wide open in Endzone for TD. Remember Janis looking obvious for a sure penalty trying to put a rub on a LB; it was Rodgers that masterfully rubbed [out] Thomas to get Cobb wiiiiiide open. And after the play Chancellor approached Rodgers. Rodgers put his hands on Chancellor’s shoulders taking control of the situation like a daddy telling his young son about the birds and bees; A rookie psychologically dominating a perennial all pro vet like Chancellor-amazing. Kinda like he way Nerd, Buckeye, GB guy and GreenGold dominate UU.

2nd Q :56 2nd and 15 – Rodgers lined up wide left, guarded man by KJ Wright, one of the best if not the best cover OLB in NFL, about 6 yards off LOS. Rodgers charges up field pressures Wright to begin back peddle and runs a perfect 1 line stick/curl. He had 3-4 yards of separation on Wright.

4th Q 12:41 3rd and 7- Rodgers lines up right about 5 yards off Bulaga. Wagner blitzes and Rodgers becomes the hot read and slants across the middle in the spot vacated by Wagner. If he runs the slant too shallow he don’t get 1st, if he runs it too deep, the S can defend the play. But Rodgers ran it perfectly, exactly 7 yards. He got smacked by Chancellor and held onto the important 1st down. Oh and Rodgers was Wonderlic enough to know he was the hot read and Wonderlic enough to recognize the blitz; something that Janis was not Wonderlic enough to do in preseason [or practice given he never got to play].

:30 2nd 10- Rodgers wide right w/ Chancellor covering him man. Rodgers had a combo route; Aaron Rodgers threw a back shoulder and Rich wasn’t ready for one. This was definitely Rodgers’ fault...LOL, but seeing that Chancellor had Rich blanketed on top; Rich was the one who probably misread the situation.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



First, no one runs one 40 Combine time. Various organizations publish different numbers.

Second, the Sports Exchange has them at 4.55! Cobb is not a burner and the Exchange’s numbers fairly represent what we see on the field. Cobb’s measurables are pedestrian.

Third, who the fu%$ cares....LOL? I only responded so others would not be misled by a dishonest and uninformed perspective and to draw attention to an incestuous propensity to derail what could be good discussion/argument by piddling about with petty minutiae; Rush Limbaugh-like logic; prevaricational twisting of what others say; incessant repeating; while portending to respond, but not responding at all.

Fourth, if an opinion must be guarded by the aforementioned tactics and can’t withstand real honest fan to fan good football discussion maybe, just maybe, that opinion is kinda worthless...LOL

Fifth, if one wants credibility, they honestly address the gravamen of the issues at hand; they don’t inveterately focus on the incorrigibly pedophilic and insignificant details. Address the issues or continue to be ignored.


uffda udfa
10 years ago

First, no one runs one 40 Combine time. Various organizations publish different numbers.

Second, the Sports Exchange has them at 4.55! Cobb is not a burner and the Exchange’s numbers fairly represent what we see on the field. Cobb’s measurables are pedestrian.

Third, who the fu%$ cares....LOL? I only responded so others would not be misled by a dishonest and uninformed perspective and to draw attention to an incestuous propensity to derail what could be good discussion/argument by piddling about with petty minutiae; Rush Limbaugh-like logic; prevaricational twisting of what others say; incessant repeating; while portending to respond, but not responding at all.

Fourth, if an opinion must be guarded by the aforementioned tactics and can’t withstand real honest fan to fan good football discussion maybe, just maybe, that opinion is kinda worthless...LOL

Fifth, if one wants credibility, they honestly address the gravamen of the issues at hand; they don’t inveterately focus on the incorrigibly pedophilic and insignificant details. Address the issues or continue to be ignored.


Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



I like big words. I don't like expletives. You should know Sports Exchange isn't the place to look and 4.46 isn't pedestrian speed. Cobb is pretty fast.

Uninformed perspective? Oh, the one that says RR is Ed West and Jermichael Finley rolled into one because he's the exact same guy to the core as RC18? You know this how?

You can talk and I can talk. We'll see how RR is this year. Same goes for Adams, Janis and the rest of the guys bandied about.

Good football discussion? Who defines that? You? Good discussion doesn't include comparing RR to Gronkowski. I think you whiffed badly when you tried to trivialize Randall Cobb as the same kind of non descript athlete as Richard freaking Rodgers. Not only did you do that but you went on to say they're the same person and given that they are the same "to the core" we will see similar results. I think that's crazy.

Your pearly post on Richard Rodgers was refuted by sschind and then you went even stranger to further your viewpoint that had already been shown to be specious. You're beautifully written but I think you're off. Way off. What I can't challenge Barfarn? The same thing that is said of me could be said of you. You don't like your opinion challenged. Good. I respect that you don't. You are smart and you know you're smarter than the average poster here. I like when you let it all out on me because you feel I deserve it. I know why you think I do. You wouldn't do that to anyone else.

I think you are wrong about Richard Rodgers. We shall see.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
10 years ago

I like big words. I don't like expletives. You should know Sports Exchange isn't the place to look and 4.46 isn't pedestrian speed. Cobb is pretty fast.

Uninformed perspective? Oh, the one that says RR is Ed West and Jermichael Finley rolled into one because he's the exact same guy to the core as RC18? You know this how?

You can talk and I can talk. We'll see how RR is this year. Same goes for Adams, Janis and the rest of the guys bandied about.

Good football discussion? Who defines that? You? Good discussion doesn't include comparing RR to Gronkowski. I think you whiffed badly when you tried to trivialize Randall Cobb as the same kind of non descript athlete as Richard freaking Rodgers. Not only did you do that but you went on to say they're the same person and given that they are the same "to the core" we will see similar results. I think that's crazy.

Your pearly post on Richard Rodgers was refuted by sschind and then you went even stranger to further your viewpoint that had already been shown to be specious. You're beautifully written but I think you're off. Way off. What I can't challenge Barfarn? The same thing that is said of me could be said of you. You don't like your opinion challenged. Good. I respect that you don't. You are smart and you know you're smarter than the average poster here. I like when you let it all out on me because you feel I deserve it. I know why you think I do. You wouldn't do that to anyone else.

I think you are wrong about Richard Rodgers. We shall see.



Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Cobb is pretty good, but his measurables are nowhere near Janis's. He'll have to give up some opportunities this seaon lol

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
dfosterf (56m) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (1h) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (1h) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.