uffda udfa
9 years ago

And once again Uffda has hijacked another thread to stroke his own ego and talk negative about The Green Bay Packers.

HEY UFFDA THERE IS A NEW THREAD STARTED SBOUT TED THOMPSONS SUCCESS, HURRY HURRY HURRY , YOU DON'T WANT REAL PACKER FANS TO DOMINATE IT TOO LONG!



Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



If "REAL"= out of touch with reality, then you're right...I'm not a real fan. I'm objective...I look at them as I do teams I'm not a fan of while being a fan. It is more fun your way but much less "real".




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


buckeyepackfan
9 years ago

If "REAL"= out of touch with reality, then you're right...I'm not a real fan. I'm objective...I look at them as I do teams I'm not a fan of while being a fan. It is more fun your way but much less "real".



Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Hey IT'S. ALL ABOUT YOU!

They should rename this forum

Allaboutuffda.com!

🤣 😂 😂 😂 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 🤣



I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Hey IT'S. ALL ABOUT YOU!

They should rename this forum

Allaboutuffda.com!

🤣 😂 😂 😂 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 🤣


Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



It's never been about me. My opinions are strong and conflict with yours. Sorry. Z should create a sub forum called: Objective Packers fans. I would promise never to come visit Kool aid land if he did that. You and I would never cross paths again and for that I would feel a tremendous void.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


voiceofreason
9 years ago
TE will most likely be our weakest position on offense, but only because we are so stacked at every other offensive position. Our TE's are serviceable. RR has potential.
blank
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

TE will most likely be our weakest position on offense, but only because we are so stacked at every other offensive position. Our TE's are serviceable. RR has potential.

Originally Posted by: voiceofreason 



It will be our least strength that's for sure. Saying it's a weakness would imply there are many. That I don't believe to be true.
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
9 years ago
Cobb’s measurables are categorically pedestrian: 5’10” 19; 4.55/2.66/1.60; bench 16; vert 33.5; jump 9’7”; shuttle 4.34; cone 7.08; But his measure as a man on a 1-100 scale: 120!!!!! Cobb does not get open because of his measurables; he gets open because he’s a man/good football player.

RRodgers is the exact same guy as Cobb right down to the core! And he will definitely be a better route runner than Finley, which means he’ll get open when Finley could not, thus making him a more dangerous receiver than Finley. He’ll get his opportunities to get deep and he won’t drop the ball like Finley did.

If one looks at where Rodgers was at week 1 and then week 20 it bodes well for his future; here’s some of his play in Champ game:

1st Q 10:28 1st 10; GB is in 2x2 4 wr set and Rodgers about 3 yards off Bakhtiari’s left shoulder. Hawks were playing 4 man rush; on Packers left Wright and Maxwell were playing a short-deep zone on Cobb and Adams; Sherman and Lane were playing Nelson and Boykin man on right side; Wagner was man up on Rodgers and 2 safeties played deep halves. Rodgers ran his route right at Wagner gave him the slightest look left and as soon as Wagner shifted his weight; Rodgers cut to middle. Wagner is the absolute best MLB cover guy in NFL and arguably he’s one of the best all time. And Rodgers sensed the perfect moment to cut to the middle and he had 6 yards separation-SIX YARDS and caught the ball for a 12 yard gain!!!! Wagner’s jock was so faked it ended up around his ankles. Now if Finley or Janis ran that route they may have gotten 1-2 yards separation at best; because their route running instincts are nothing like Rodgers’. That is an effing studly quick twitch. Separation is not about speed; it is about timing and feel for when the cover dude is off balance.

1:28 1st 10; RR caught one for 11 yards in middle; but Hawks got caught in zone blitz and Schofield looked awkward trying to drop into his short zone were RR caught the ball. Anyone, my grandma or the 53 YO Ed West would have easily been open for this catch.

:06 2nd at 5; Cobb was wide open in Endzone for TD. Remember Janis looking obvious for a sure penalty trying to put a rub on a LB; it was Rodgers that masterfully rubbed [out] Thomas to get Cobb wiiiiiide open. And after the play Chancellor approached Rodgers. Rodgers put his hands on Chancellor’s shoulders taking control of the situation like a daddy telling his young son about the birds and bees; A rookie psychologically dominating a perennial all pro vet like Chancellor-amazing. Kinda like he way Nerd, Buckeye, GB guy and GreenGold dominate UU.

2nd Q :56 2nd and 15 – Rodgers lined up wide left, guarded man by KJ Wright, one of the best if not the best cover OLB in NFL, about 6 yards off LOS. Rodgers charges up field pressures Wright to begin back peddle and runs a perfect 1 line stick/curl. He had 3-4 yards of separation on Wright.

4th Q 12:41 3rd and 7- Rodgers lines up right about 5 yards off Bulaga. Wagner blitzes and Rodgers becomes the hot read and slants across the middle in the spot vacated by Wagner. If he runs the slant too shallow he don’t get 1st, if he runs it too deep, the S can defend the play. But Rodgers ran it perfectly, exactly 7 yards. He got smacked by Chancellor and held onto the important 1st down. Oh and Rodgers was Wonderlic enough to know he was the hot read and Wonderlic enough to recognize the blitz; something that Janis was not Wonderlic enough to do in preseason [or practice given he never got to play].

:30 2nd 10- Rodgers wide right w/ Chancellor covering him man. Rodgers had a combo route; Aaron Rodgers threw a back shoulder and Rich wasn’t ready for one. This was definitely Rodgers’ fault...LOL, but seeing that Chancellor had Rich blanketed on top; Rich was the one who probably misread the situation.
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Cobb’s measurables are categorically pedestrian: 5’10” 19; 4.55/2.66/1.60; bench 16; vert 33.5; jump 9’7”; shuttle 4.34; cone 7.08; But his measure as a man on a 1-100 scale: 120!!!!! Cobb does not get open because of his measurables; he gets open because he’s a man/good football player.

RRodgers is the exact same guy as Cobb right down to the core! And he will definitely be a better route runner than Finley, which means he’ll get open when Finley could not, thus making him a more dangerous receiver than Finley. He’ll get his opportunities to get deep and he won’t drop the ball like Finley did.

If one looks at where Rodgers was at week 1 and then week 20 it bodes well for his future; here’s some of his play in Champ game:

1st Q 10:28 1st 10; GB is in 2x2 4 wr set and Rodgers about 3 yards off Bakhtiari’s left shoulder. Hawks were playing 4 man rush; on Packers left Wright and Maxwell were playing a short-deep zone on Cobb and Adams; Sherman and Lane were playing Nelson and Boykin man on right side; Wagner was man up on Rodgers and 2 safeties played deep halves. Rodgers ran his route right at Wagner gave him the slightest look left and as soon as Wagner shifted his weight; Rodgers cut to middle. Wagner is the absolute best MLB cover guy in NFL and arguably he’s one of the best all time. And Rodgers sensed the perfect moment to cut to the middle and he had 6 yards separation-SIX YARDS and caught the ball for a 12 yard gain!!!! Wagner’s jock was so faked it ended up around his ankles. Now if Finley or Janis ran that route they may have gotten 1-2 yards separation at best; because their route running instincts are nothing like Rodgers’. That is an effing studly quick twitch. Separation is not about speed; it is about timing and feel for when the cover dude is off balance.

1:28 1st 10; RR caught one for 11 yards in middle; but Hawks got caught in zone blitz and Schofield looked awkward trying to drop into his short zone were RR caught the ball. Anyone, my grandma or the 53 YO Ed West would have easily been open for this catch.

:06 2nd at 5; Cobb was wide open in Endzone for TD. Remember Janis looking obvious for a sure penalty trying to put a rub on a LB; it was Rodgers that masterfully rubbed [out] Thomas to get Cobb wiiiiiide open. And after the play Chancellor approached Rodgers. Rodgers put his hands on Chancellor’s shoulders taking control of the situation like a daddy telling his young son about the birds and bees; A rookie psychologically dominating a perennial all pro vet like Chancellor-amazing. Kinda like he way Nerd, Buckeye, GB guy and GreenGold dominate UU.

2nd Q :56 2nd and 15 – Rodgers lined up wide left, guarded man by KJ Wright, one of the best if not the best cover OLB in NFL, about 6 yards off LOS. Rodgers charges up field pressures Wright to begin back peddle and runs a perfect 1 line stick/curl. He had 3-4 yards of separation on Wright.

4th Q 12:41 3rd and 7- Rodgers lines up right about 5 yards off Bulaga. Wagner blitzes and Rodgers becomes the hot read and slants across the middle in the spot vacated by Wagner. If he runs the slant too shallow he don’t get 1st, if he runs it too deep, the S can defend the play. But Rodgers ran it perfectly, exactly 7 yards. He got smacked by Chancellor and held onto the important 1st down. Oh and Rodgers was Wonderlic enough to know he was the hot read and Wonderlic enough to recognize the blitz; something that Janis was not Wonderlic enough to do in preseason [or practice given he never got to play].

:30 2nd 10- Rodgers wide right w/ Chancellor covering him man. Rodgers had a combo route; Aaron Rodgers threw a back shoulder and Rich wasn’t ready for one. This was definitely Rodgers’ fault...LOL, but seeing that Chancellor had Rich blanketed on top; Rich was the one who probably misread the situation.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



It's hard enough taking some of this stuff seriously but when you post Randall's 40 time as 4.55 when he's a 4.46 combine guy you really lose credibility.

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/randall-cobb?id=2495448 
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Barfarn
9 years ago

Cobb’s measurables are categorically pedestrian: 5’10” 19; 4.55/2.66/1.60; bench 16; vert 33.5; jump 9’7”; shuttle 4.34; cone 7.08; But his measure as a man on a 1-100 scale: 120!!!!! Cobb does not get open because of his measurables; he gets open because he’s a man/good football player.

RRodgers is the exact same guy as Cobb right down to the core! And he will definitely be a better route runner than Finley, which means he’ll get open when Finley could not, thus making him a more dangerous receiver than Finley. He’ll get his opportunities to get deep and he won’t drop the ball like Finley did.

If one looks at where Rodgers was at week 1 and then week 20 it bodes well for his future; here’s some of his play in Champ game:

1st Q 10:28 1st 10; GB is in 2x2 4 wr set and Rodgers about 3 yards off Bakhtiari’s left shoulder. Hawks were playing 4 man rush; on Packers left Wright and Maxwell were playing a short-deep zone on Cobb and Adams; Sherman and Lane were playing Nelson and Boykin man on right side; Wagner was man up on Rodgers and 2 safeties played deep halves. Rodgers ran his route right at Wagner gave him the slightest look left and as soon as Wagner shifted his weight; Rodgers cut to middle. Wagner is the absolute best MLB cover guy in NFL and arguably he’s one of the best all time. And Rodgers sensed the perfect moment to cut to the middle and he had 6 yards separation-SIX YARDS and caught the ball for a 12 yard gain!!!! Wagner’s jock was so faked it ended up around his ankles. Now if Finley or Janis ran that route they may have gotten 1-2 yards separation at best; because their route running instincts are nothing like Rodgers’. That is an effing studly quick twitch. Separation is not about speed; it is about timing and feel for when the cover dude is off balance.

1:28 1st 10; RR caught one for 11 yards in middle; but Hawks got caught in zone blitz and Schofield looked awkward trying to drop into his short zone were RR caught the ball. Anyone, my grandma or the 53 YO Ed West would have easily been open for this catch.

:06 2nd at 5; Cobb was wide open in Endzone for TD. Remember Janis looking obvious for a sure penalty trying to put a rub on a LB; it was Rodgers that masterfully rubbed [out] Thomas to get Cobb wiiiiiide open. And after the play Chancellor approached Rodgers. Rodgers put his hands on Chancellor’s shoulders taking control of the situation like a daddy telling his young son about the birds and bees; A rookie psychologically dominating a perennial all pro vet like Chancellor-amazing. Kinda like he way Nerd, Buckeye, GB guy and GreenGold dominate UU.

2nd Q :56 2nd and 15 – Rodgers lined up wide left, guarded man by KJ Wright, one of the best if not the best cover OLB in NFL, about 6 yards off LOS. Rodgers charges up field pressures Wright to begin back peddle and runs a perfect 1 line stick/curl. He had 3-4 yards of separation on Wright.

4th Q 12:41 3rd and 7- Rodgers lines up right about 5 yards off Bulaga. Wagner blitzes and Rodgers becomes the hot read and slants across the middle in the spot vacated by Wagner. If he runs the slant too shallow he don’t get 1st, if he runs it too deep, the S can defend the play. But Rodgers ran it perfectly, exactly 7 yards. He got smacked by Chancellor and held onto the important 1st down. Oh and Rodgers was Wonderlic enough to know he was the hot read and Wonderlic enough to recognize the blitz; something that Janis was not Wonderlic enough to do in preseason [or practice given he never got to play].

:30 2nd 10- Rodgers wide right w/ Chancellor covering him man. Rodgers had a combo route; Aaron Rodgers threw a back shoulder and Rich wasn’t ready for one. This was definitely Rodgers’ fault...LOL, but seeing that Chancellor had Rich blanketed on top; Rich was the one who probably misread the situation.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



First, no one runs one 40 Combine time. Various organizations publish different numbers.

Second, the Sports Exchange has them at 4.55! Cobb is not a burner and the Exchange’s numbers fairly represent what we see on the field. Cobb’s measurables are pedestrian.

Third, who the fu%$ cares....LOL? I only responded so others would not be misled by a dishonest and uninformed perspective and to draw attention to an incestuous propensity to derail what could be good discussion/argument by piddling about with petty minutiae; Rush Limbaugh-like logic; prevaricational twisting of what others say; incessant repeating; while portending to respond, but not responding at all.

Fourth, if an opinion must be guarded by the aforementioned tactics and can’t withstand real honest fan to fan good football discussion maybe, just maybe, that opinion is kinda worthless...LOL

Fifth, if one wants credibility, they honestly address the gravamen of the issues at hand; they don’t inveterately focus on the incorrigibly pedophilic and insignificant details. Address the issues or continue to be ignored.


uffda udfa
9 years ago

First, no one runs one 40 Combine time. Various organizations publish different numbers.

Second, the Sports Exchange has them at 4.55! Cobb is not a burner and the Exchange’s numbers fairly represent what we see on the field. Cobb’s measurables are pedestrian.

Third, who the fu%$ cares....LOL? I only responded so others would not be misled by a dishonest and uninformed perspective and to draw attention to an incestuous propensity to derail what could be good discussion/argument by piddling about with petty minutiae; Rush Limbaugh-like logic; prevaricational twisting of what others say; incessant repeating; while portending to respond, but not responding at all.

Fourth, if an opinion must be guarded by the aforementioned tactics and can’t withstand real honest fan to fan good football discussion maybe, just maybe, that opinion is kinda worthless...LOL

Fifth, if one wants credibility, they honestly address the gravamen of the issues at hand; they don’t inveterately focus on the incorrigibly pedophilic and insignificant details. Address the issues or continue to be ignored.


Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



I like big words. I don't like expletives. You should know Sports Exchange isn't the place to look and 4.46 isn't pedestrian speed. Cobb is pretty fast.

Uninformed perspective? Oh, the one that says RR is Ed West and Jermichael Finley rolled into one because he's the exact same guy to the core as RC18? You know this how?

You can talk and I can talk. We'll see how RR is this year. Same goes for Adams, Janis and the rest of the guys bandied about.

Good football discussion? Who defines that? You? Good discussion doesn't include comparing RR to Gronkowski. I think you whiffed badly when you tried to trivialize Randall Cobb as the same kind of non descript athlete as Richard freaking Rodgers. Not only did you do that but you went on to say they're the same person and given that they are the same "to the core" we will see similar results. I think that's crazy.

Your pearly post on Richard Rodgers was refuted by sschind and then you went even stranger to further your viewpoint that had already been shown to be specious. You're beautifully written but I think you're off. Way off. What I can't challenge Barfarn? The same thing that is said of me could be said of you. You don't like your opinion challenged. Good. I respect that you don't. You are smart and you know you're smarter than the average poster here. I like when you let it all out on me because you feel I deserve it. I know why you think I do. You wouldn't do that to anyone else.

I think you are wrong about Richard Rodgers. We shall see.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
9 years ago

I like big words. I don't like expletives. You should know Sports Exchange isn't the place to look and 4.46 isn't pedestrian speed. Cobb is pretty fast.

Uninformed perspective? Oh, the one that says RR is Ed West and Jermichael Finley rolled into one because he's the exact same guy to the core as RC18? You know this how?

You can talk and I can talk. We'll see how RR is this year. Same goes for Adams, Janis and the rest of the guys bandied about.

Good football discussion? Who defines that? You? Good discussion doesn't include comparing RR to Gronkowski. I think you whiffed badly when you tried to trivialize Randall Cobb as the same kind of non descript athlete as Richard freaking Rodgers. Not only did you do that but you went on to say they're the same person and given that they are the same "to the core" we will see similar results. I think that's crazy.

Your pearly post on Richard Rodgers was refuted by sschind and then you went even stranger to further your viewpoint that had already been shown to be specious. You're beautifully written but I think you're off. Way off. What I can't challenge Barfarn? The same thing that is said of me could be said of you. You don't like your opinion challenged. Good. I respect that you don't. You are smart and you know you're smarter than the average poster here. I like when you let it all out on me because you feel I deserve it. I know why you think I do. You wouldn't do that to anyone else.

I think you are wrong about Richard Rodgers. We shall see.



Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Cobb is pretty good, but his measurables are nowhere near Janis's. He'll have to give up some opportunities this seaon lol

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (6h) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (9h) : HUMP DAY
beast (9h) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (9h) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (9h) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (9h) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (9h) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (9h) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (9h) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (10h) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (10h) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (12h) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (12h) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (12h) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (12h) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (12h) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (12h) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23h / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.