uffda udfa
9 years ago

And once again Uffda has hijacked another thread to stroke his own ego and talk negative about The Green Bay Packers.

HEY UFFDA THERE IS A NEW THREAD STARTED SBOUT TED THOMPSONS SUCCESS, HURRY HURRY HURRY , YOU DON'T WANT REAL PACKER FANS TO DOMINATE IT TOO LONG!



Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



If "REAL"= out of touch with reality, then you're right...I'm not a real fan. I'm objective...I look at them as I do teams I'm not a fan of while being a fan. It is more fun your way but much less "real".




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


buckeyepackfan
9 years ago

If "REAL"= out of touch with reality, then you're right...I'm not a real fan. I'm objective...I look at them as I do teams I'm not a fan of while being a fan. It is more fun your way but much less "real".



Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Hey IT'S. ALL ABOUT YOU!

They should rename this forum

Allaboutuffda.com!

🤣 😂 😂 😂 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 🤣



I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Hey IT'S. ALL ABOUT YOU!

They should rename this forum

Allaboutuffda.com!

🤣 😂 😂 😂 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 🤣


Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



It's never been about me. My opinions are strong and conflict with yours. Sorry. Z should create a sub forum called: Objective Packers fans. I would promise never to come visit Kool aid land if he did that. You and I would never cross paths again and for that I would feel a tremendous void.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


voiceofreason
9 years ago
TE will most likely be our weakest position on offense, but only because we are so stacked at every other offensive position. Our TE's are serviceable. RR has potential.
blank
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

TE will most likely be our weakest position on offense, but only because we are so stacked at every other offensive position. Our TE's are serviceable. RR has potential.

Originally Posted by: voiceofreason 



It will be our least strength that's for sure. Saying it's a weakness would imply there are many. That I don't believe to be true.
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
9 years ago
Cobb’s measurables are categorically pedestrian: 5’10” 19; 4.55/2.66/1.60; bench 16; vert 33.5; jump 9’7”; shuttle 4.34; cone 7.08; But his measure as a man on a 1-100 scale: 120!!!!! Cobb does not get open because of his measurables; he gets open because he’s a man/good football player.

RRodgers is the exact same guy as Cobb right down to the core! And he will definitely be a better route runner than Finley, which means he’ll get open when Finley could not, thus making him a more dangerous receiver than Finley. He’ll get his opportunities to get deep and he won’t drop the ball like Finley did.

If one looks at where Rodgers was at week 1 and then week 20 it bodes well for his future; here’s some of his play in Champ game:

1st Q 10:28 1st 10; GB is in 2x2 4 wr set and Rodgers about 3 yards off Bakhtiari’s left shoulder. Hawks were playing 4 man rush; on Packers left Wright and Maxwell were playing a short-deep zone on Cobb and Adams; Sherman and Lane were playing Nelson and Boykin man on right side; Wagner was man up on Rodgers and 2 safeties played deep halves. Rodgers ran his route right at Wagner gave him the slightest look left and as soon as Wagner shifted his weight; Rodgers cut to middle. Wagner is the absolute best MLB cover guy in NFL and arguably he’s one of the best all time. And Rodgers sensed the perfect moment to cut to the middle and he had 6 yards separation-SIX YARDS and caught the ball for a 12 yard gain!!!! Wagner’s jock was so faked it ended up around his ankles. Now if Finley or Janis ran that route they may have gotten 1-2 yards separation at best; because their route running instincts are nothing like Rodgers’. That is an effing studly quick twitch. Separation is not about speed; it is about timing and feel for when the cover dude is off balance.

1:28 1st 10; RR caught one for 11 yards in middle; but Hawks got caught in zone blitz and Schofield looked awkward trying to drop into his short zone were RR caught the ball. Anyone, my grandma or the 53 YO Ed West would have easily been open for this catch.

:06 2nd at 5; Cobb was wide open in Endzone for TD. Remember Janis looking obvious for a sure penalty trying to put a rub on a LB; it was Rodgers that masterfully rubbed [out] Thomas to get Cobb wiiiiiide open. And after the play Chancellor approached Rodgers. Rodgers put his hands on Chancellor’s shoulders taking control of the situation like a daddy telling his young son about the birds and bees; A rookie psychologically dominating a perennial all pro vet like Chancellor-amazing. Kinda like he way Nerd, Buckeye, GB guy and GreenGold dominate UU.

2nd Q :56 2nd and 15 – Rodgers lined up wide left, guarded man by KJ Wright, one of the best if not the best cover OLB in NFL, about 6 yards off LOS. Rodgers charges up field pressures Wright to begin back peddle and runs a perfect 1 line stick/curl. He had 3-4 yards of separation on Wright.

4th Q 12:41 3rd and 7- Rodgers lines up right about 5 yards off Bulaga. Wagner blitzes and Rodgers becomes the hot read and slants across the middle in the spot vacated by Wagner. If he runs the slant too shallow he don’t get 1st, if he runs it too deep, the S can defend the play. But Rodgers ran it perfectly, exactly 7 yards. He got smacked by Chancellor and held onto the important 1st down. Oh and Rodgers was Wonderlic enough to know he was the hot read and Wonderlic enough to recognize the blitz; something that Janis was not Wonderlic enough to do in preseason [or practice given he never got to play].

:30 2nd 10- Rodgers wide right w/ Chancellor covering him man. Rodgers had a combo route; Aaron Rodgers threw a back shoulder and Rich wasn’t ready for one. This was definitely Rodgers’ fault...LOL, but seeing that Chancellor had Rich blanketed on top; Rich was the one who probably misread the situation.
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Cobb’s measurables are categorically pedestrian: 5’10” 19; 4.55/2.66/1.60; bench 16; vert 33.5; jump 9’7”; shuttle 4.34; cone 7.08; But his measure as a man on a 1-100 scale: 120!!!!! Cobb does not get open because of his measurables; he gets open because he’s a man/good football player.

RRodgers is the exact same guy as Cobb right down to the core! And he will definitely be a better route runner than Finley, which means he’ll get open when Finley could not, thus making him a more dangerous receiver than Finley. He’ll get his opportunities to get deep and he won’t drop the ball like Finley did.

If one looks at where Rodgers was at week 1 and then week 20 it bodes well for his future; here’s some of his play in Champ game:

1st Q 10:28 1st 10; GB is in 2x2 4 wr set and Rodgers about 3 yards off Bakhtiari’s left shoulder. Hawks were playing 4 man rush; on Packers left Wright and Maxwell were playing a short-deep zone on Cobb and Adams; Sherman and Lane were playing Nelson and Boykin man on right side; Wagner was man up on Rodgers and 2 safeties played deep halves. Rodgers ran his route right at Wagner gave him the slightest look left and as soon as Wagner shifted his weight; Rodgers cut to middle. Wagner is the absolute best MLB cover guy in NFL and arguably he’s one of the best all time. And Rodgers sensed the perfect moment to cut to the middle and he had 6 yards separation-SIX YARDS and caught the ball for a 12 yard gain!!!! Wagner’s jock was so faked it ended up around his ankles. Now if Finley or Janis ran that route they may have gotten 1-2 yards separation at best; because their route running instincts are nothing like Rodgers’. That is an effing studly quick twitch. Separation is not about speed; it is about timing and feel for when the cover dude is off balance.

1:28 1st 10; RR caught one for 11 yards in middle; but Hawks got caught in zone blitz and Schofield looked awkward trying to drop into his short zone were RR caught the ball. Anyone, my grandma or the 53 YO Ed West would have easily been open for this catch.

:06 2nd at 5; Cobb was wide open in Endzone for TD. Remember Janis looking obvious for a sure penalty trying to put a rub on a LB; it was Rodgers that masterfully rubbed [out] Thomas to get Cobb wiiiiiide open. And after the play Chancellor approached Rodgers. Rodgers put his hands on Chancellor’s shoulders taking control of the situation like a daddy telling his young son about the birds and bees; A rookie psychologically dominating a perennial all pro vet like Chancellor-amazing. Kinda like he way Nerd, Buckeye, GB guy and GreenGold dominate UU.

2nd Q :56 2nd and 15 – Rodgers lined up wide left, guarded man by KJ Wright, one of the best if not the best cover OLB in NFL, about 6 yards off LOS. Rodgers charges up field pressures Wright to begin back peddle and runs a perfect 1 line stick/curl. He had 3-4 yards of separation on Wright.

4th Q 12:41 3rd and 7- Rodgers lines up right about 5 yards off Bulaga. Wagner blitzes and Rodgers becomes the hot read and slants across the middle in the spot vacated by Wagner. If he runs the slant too shallow he don’t get 1st, if he runs it too deep, the S can defend the play. But Rodgers ran it perfectly, exactly 7 yards. He got smacked by Chancellor and held onto the important 1st down. Oh and Rodgers was Wonderlic enough to know he was the hot read and Wonderlic enough to recognize the blitz; something that Janis was not Wonderlic enough to do in preseason [or practice given he never got to play].

:30 2nd 10- Rodgers wide right w/ Chancellor covering him man. Rodgers had a combo route; Aaron Rodgers threw a back shoulder and Rich wasn’t ready for one. This was definitely Rodgers’ fault...LOL, but seeing that Chancellor had Rich blanketed on top; Rich was the one who probably misread the situation.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



It's hard enough taking some of this stuff seriously but when you post Randall's 40 time as 4.55 when he's a 4.46 combine guy you really lose credibility.

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/randall-cobb?id=2495448 
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Barfarn
9 years ago

Cobb’s measurables are categorically pedestrian: 5’10” 19; 4.55/2.66/1.60; bench 16; vert 33.5; jump 9’7”; shuttle 4.34; cone 7.08; But his measure as a man on a 1-100 scale: 120!!!!! Cobb does not get open because of his measurables; he gets open because he’s a man/good football player.

RRodgers is the exact same guy as Cobb right down to the core! And he will definitely be a better route runner than Finley, which means he’ll get open when Finley could not, thus making him a more dangerous receiver than Finley. He’ll get his opportunities to get deep and he won’t drop the ball like Finley did.

If one looks at where Rodgers was at week 1 and then week 20 it bodes well for his future; here’s some of his play in Champ game:

1st Q 10:28 1st 10; GB is in 2x2 4 wr set and Rodgers about 3 yards off Bakhtiari’s left shoulder. Hawks were playing 4 man rush; on Packers left Wright and Maxwell were playing a short-deep zone on Cobb and Adams; Sherman and Lane were playing Nelson and Boykin man on right side; Wagner was man up on Rodgers and 2 safeties played deep halves. Rodgers ran his route right at Wagner gave him the slightest look left and as soon as Wagner shifted his weight; Rodgers cut to middle. Wagner is the absolute best MLB cover guy in NFL and arguably he’s one of the best all time. And Rodgers sensed the perfect moment to cut to the middle and he had 6 yards separation-SIX YARDS and caught the ball for a 12 yard gain!!!! Wagner’s jock was so faked it ended up around his ankles. Now if Finley or Janis ran that route they may have gotten 1-2 yards separation at best; because their route running instincts are nothing like Rodgers’. That is an effing studly quick twitch. Separation is not about speed; it is about timing and feel for when the cover dude is off balance.

1:28 1st 10; RR caught one for 11 yards in middle; but Hawks got caught in zone blitz and Schofield looked awkward trying to drop into his short zone were RR caught the ball. Anyone, my grandma or the 53 YO Ed West would have easily been open for this catch.

:06 2nd at 5; Cobb was wide open in Endzone for TD. Remember Janis looking obvious for a sure penalty trying to put a rub on a LB; it was Rodgers that masterfully rubbed [out] Thomas to get Cobb wiiiiiide open. And after the play Chancellor approached Rodgers. Rodgers put his hands on Chancellor’s shoulders taking control of the situation like a daddy telling his young son about the birds and bees; A rookie psychologically dominating a perennial all pro vet like Chancellor-amazing. Kinda like he way Nerd, Buckeye, GB guy and GreenGold dominate UU.

2nd Q :56 2nd and 15 – Rodgers lined up wide left, guarded man by KJ Wright, one of the best if not the best cover OLB in NFL, about 6 yards off LOS. Rodgers charges up field pressures Wright to begin back peddle and runs a perfect 1 line stick/curl. He had 3-4 yards of separation on Wright.

4th Q 12:41 3rd and 7- Rodgers lines up right about 5 yards off Bulaga. Wagner blitzes and Rodgers becomes the hot read and slants across the middle in the spot vacated by Wagner. If he runs the slant too shallow he don’t get 1st, if he runs it too deep, the S can defend the play. But Rodgers ran it perfectly, exactly 7 yards. He got smacked by Chancellor and held onto the important 1st down. Oh and Rodgers was Wonderlic enough to know he was the hot read and Wonderlic enough to recognize the blitz; something that Janis was not Wonderlic enough to do in preseason [or practice given he never got to play].

:30 2nd 10- Rodgers wide right w/ Chancellor covering him man. Rodgers had a combo route; Aaron Rodgers threw a back shoulder and Rich wasn’t ready for one. This was definitely Rodgers’ fault...LOL, but seeing that Chancellor had Rich blanketed on top; Rich was the one who probably misread the situation.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



First, no one runs one 40 Combine time. Various organizations publish different numbers.

Second, the Sports Exchange has them at 4.55! Cobb is not a burner and the Exchange’s numbers fairly represent what we see on the field. Cobb’s measurables are pedestrian.

Third, who the fu%$ cares....LOL? I only responded so others would not be misled by a dishonest and uninformed perspective and to draw attention to an incestuous propensity to derail what could be good discussion/argument by piddling about with petty minutiae; Rush Limbaugh-like logic; prevaricational twisting of what others say; incessant repeating; while portending to respond, but not responding at all.

Fourth, if an opinion must be guarded by the aforementioned tactics and can’t withstand real honest fan to fan good football discussion maybe, just maybe, that opinion is kinda worthless...LOL

Fifth, if one wants credibility, they honestly address the gravamen of the issues at hand; they don’t inveterately focus on the incorrigibly pedophilic and insignificant details. Address the issues or continue to be ignored.


uffda udfa
9 years ago

First, no one runs one 40 Combine time. Various organizations publish different numbers.

Second, the Sports Exchange has them at 4.55! Cobb is not a burner and the Exchange’s numbers fairly represent what we see on the field. Cobb’s measurables are pedestrian.

Third, who the fu%$ cares....LOL? I only responded so others would not be misled by a dishonest and uninformed perspective and to draw attention to an incestuous propensity to derail what could be good discussion/argument by piddling about with petty minutiae; Rush Limbaugh-like logic; prevaricational twisting of what others say; incessant repeating; while portending to respond, but not responding at all.

Fourth, if an opinion must be guarded by the aforementioned tactics and can’t withstand real honest fan to fan good football discussion maybe, just maybe, that opinion is kinda worthless...LOL

Fifth, if one wants credibility, they honestly address the gravamen of the issues at hand; they don’t inveterately focus on the incorrigibly pedophilic and insignificant details. Address the issues or continue to be ignored.


Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



I like big words. I don't like expletives. You should know Sports Exchange isn't the place to look and 4.46 isn't pedestrian speed. Cobb is pretty fast.

Uninformed perspective? Oh, the one that says RR is Ed West and Jermichael Finley rolled into one because he's the exact same guy to the core as RC18? You know this how?

You can talk and I can talk. We'll see how RR is this year. Same goes for Adams, Janis and the rest of the guys bandied about.

Good football discussion? Who defines that? You? Good discussion doesn't include comparing RR to Gronkowski. I think you whiffed badly when you tried to trivialize Randall Cobb as the same kind of non descript athlete as Richard freaking Rodgers. Not only did you do that but you went on to say they're the same person and given that they are the same "to the core" we will see similar results. I think that's crazy.

Your pearly post on Richard Rodgers was refuted by sschind and then you went even stranger to further your viewpoint that had already been shown to be specious. You're beautifully written but I think you're off. Way off. What I can't challenge Barfarn? The same thing that is said of me could be said of you. You don't like your opinion challenged. Good. I respect that you don't. You are smart and you know you're smarter than the average poster here. I like when you let it all out on me because you feel I deserve it. I know why you think I do. You wouldn't do that to anyone else.

I think you are wrong about Richard Rodgers. We shall see.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
9 years ago

I like big words. I don't like expletives. You should know Sports Exchange isn't the place to look and 4.46 isn't pedestrian speed. Cobb is pretty fast.

Uninformed perspective? Oh, the one that says RR is Ed West and Jermichael Finley rolled into one because he's the exact same guy to the core as RC18? You know this how?

You can talk and I can talk. We'll see how RR is this year. Same goes for Adams, Janis and the rest of the guys bandied about.

Good football discussion? Who defines that? You? Good discussion doesn't include comparing RR to Gronkowski. I think you whiffed badly when you tried to trivialize Randall Cobb as the same kind of non descript athlete as Richard freaking Rodgers. Not only did you do that but you went on to say they're the same person and given that they are the same "to the core" we will see similar results. I think that's crazy.

Your pearly post on Richard Rodgers was refuted by sschind and then you went even stranger to further your viewpoint that had already been shown to be specious. You're beautifully written but I think you're off. Way off. What I can't challenge Barfarn? The same thing that is said of me could be said of you. You don't like your opinion challenged. Good. I respect that you don't. You are smart and you know you're smarter than the average poster here. I like when you let it all out on me because you feel I deserve it. I know why you think I do. You wouldn't do that to anyone else.

I think you are wrong about Richard Rodgers. We shall see.



Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Cobb is pretty good, but his measurables are nowhere near Janis's. He'll have to give up some opportunities this seaon lol

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
beast (54m) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (17h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (18h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.