Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

you know, the one a few posts up that uses real analysis to show that you are talking out of your ass

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



Different thoughts and opinions don't mean they are talking from their ass.

Sorta leaving that subject ... we need more gooder smilies.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
9 years ago

you know, the one a few posts up that uses real analysis to show that you are talking out of your ass

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 




Oh, that one? I would refer you to Barfarn's work on Richard Rodgers in his latest post admitting he was horrible as a rookie but saying that was perfectly normal and he's going to be Ed West as a blocker and a better TE than Finley, or to be fair, route runner.

So, Barfarn can completely dismiss Janis yet state some huge future for RR? Okay.

Janis has speed...more than anyone else on our offense. He's strong as a bull and pretty smart as well. Why would I let Barfarn's post make me disbelieve what I saw? It can't refute his measurables which are rare.

Will be a blast watching RR and JJ this season.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


68md
9 years ago

Oh, that one? I would refer you to Barfarn's work on Richard Rodgers in his latest post admitting he was horrible as a rookie but saying that was perfectly normal and he's going to be Ed West as a blocker and a better TE than Finley, or to be fair, route runner.

So, Barfarn can completely dismiss Janis yet state some huge future for RR? Okay.

Janis has speed...more than anyone else on our offense. He's strong as a bull and pretty smart as well. Why would I let Barfarn's post make me disbelieve what I saw? It can't refute his measurables which are rare.

Will be a blast watching RR and JJ this season.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Whoa now... the "got speed" thing. We are not the Oakland Raiders in that we need a straight line speed guy.

So he has wheels. He also runs sloppy routes. Hell he still isn't knocking anyones socks off at minicamp last week. That's in shorts were his "speed" should have set him apart.

Janis is a nice prospect but after early two hand touch practice this month by all accounts Montgomery is kicking his ass already.

The guy with speed wasn't even on the return units this week but Montgomery and Abby were. ( Note Montgomery has fumblitis on punts... Abby has a leg up)

I will say we will know a lot more in August but Janis and his wheels better learn these timing routes and blocking or he may end up in Cleveland.

gbguy20
9 years ago

Oh, that one? I would refer you to Barfarn's work on Richard Rodgers in his latest post admitting he was horrible as a rookie but saying that was perfectly normal and he's going to be Ed West as a blocker and a better TE than Finley, or to be fair, route runner.

So, Barfarn can completely dismiss Janis yet state some huge future for RR? Okay.

Janis has speed...more than anyone else on our offense. He's strong as a bull and pretty smart as well. Why would I let Barfarn's post make me disbelieve what I saw? It can't refute his measurables which are rare.

Will be a blast watching RR and JJ this season.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



you cannot handle it when someone responds to your nonsense with actual facts and analysis. you speak these great things about 1 play you saw, which was a damn gimmie, AND he screwed up in the play to begin with. You ignore all of his failures the rest of the time. you are just a troll
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
+3
Barfarn
9 years ago

Oh, that one? I would refer you to Barfarn's work on Richard Rodgers in his latest post admitting he was horrible as a rookie but saying that was perfectly normal and he's going to be Ed West as a blocker and a better TE than Finley, or to be fair, route runner.

So, Barfarn can completely dismiss Janis yet state some huge future for RR? Okay.

Janis has speed...more than anyone else on our offense. He's strong as a bull and pretty smart as well. Why would I let Barfarn's post make me disbelieve what I saw? It can't refute his measurables which are rare.

Will be a blast watching RR and JJ this season.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



First, the misrepresentation of my Rodgers comments is simply dishonest.

Second, right or wrong, my opinion of Janis, like that of Rodgers, was derived by watching and evaluated every single one of his snaps [Rodgers was a special project]; as opposed to looking to one measurable or one play and building an entire cultish religious philosophy from it to the exclusion of all other logic and information.

Third, I have not dismissed Janis at all and have stated the opposite; so again it is dishonest for anyone to say I "dismissed" Janis in anyway.

Okay, we have one professing to be on a self-proclaimed mission to destroy irrational gushing homerism. BUT, I present a position of hope for Janis, which balanced by articulating some of his weaknesses; and this objective opinion is conclusorily crapped on by the purported anti-homerist; who, BTW, is irrationally gushes over a player ONLY because of his 40 time. This is the perfect paradigm of a FLAMER.

Fourth, please do not fear information; use it to enhance an opinion; though it might interfere with a nordic-12th man cult, that offers offers blood sacrifices of green and gold souls and the drinking of copious amounts of purple and [seahawk] green kool-aid, which is one heckava drug. LOL

Fifth, yes it will be a blast watching these guys PLAY IN GAMES; to bad some will be watching reruns of Janis and Rodgers running 40s at the combine instead.

Sixth, we know you saw Janis' speed, strength and smarts in a combine publication; that is worthy of one and only one comment in a thread.
+2
uffda udfa
9 years ago

you cannot handle it when someone responds to your nonsense with actual facts and analysis. you speak these great things about 1 play you saw, which was a damn gimmie, AND he screwed up in the play to begin with. You ignore all of his failures the rest of the time. you are just a troll

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



Did Randall Cobb screw up on his first TD catch? It's fine that you don't like my views. I can handle that. The rest is all window dressing.

I like Jeff Janis...he is a Packer so you should love him and have him penciled into the HOF. Ironic, that because I like the guy he's super flawed. I would examine my posts closely and see if there wasn't something going on there.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


uffda udfa
9 years ago

First, the misrepresentation of my Rodgers comments is simply dishonest.

Second, right or wrong, my opinion of Janis, like that of Rodgers, was derived by watching and evaluated every single one of his snaps [Rodgers was a special project]; as opposed to looking to one measurable or one play and building an entire cultish religious philosophy from it to the exclusion of all other logic and information.

Third, I have not dismissed Janis at all and have stated the opposite; so again it is dishonest for anyone to say I "dismissed" Janis in anyway.

Okay, we have one professing to be on a self-proclaimed mission to destroy irrational gushing homerism. BUT, I present a position of hope for Janis, which balanced by articulating some of his weaknesses; and this objective opinion is conclusorily crapped on by the purported anti-homerist; who, BTW, is irrationally gushes over a player ONLY because of his 40 time. This is the perfect paradigm of a FLAMER.

Fourth, please do not fear information; use it to enhance an opinion; though it might interfere with a nordic-12th man cult, that offers offers blood sacrifices of green and gold souls and the drinking of copious amounts of purple and [seahawk] green kool-aid, which is one heckava drug. LOL

Fifth, yes it will be a blast watching these guys PLAY IN GAMES; to bad some will be watching reruns of Janis and Rodgers running 40s at the combine instead.

Sixth, we know you saw Janis' speed, strength and smarts in a combine publication; that is worthy of one and only one comment in a thread.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



I didn't misrepresent you at all...you have gone to extremes on RR. Why? I don't know...perhaps, you'll answer.

On one hand you had to deal with some stats presented by sschind regarding your man crush on RR. You backpedaled and made a huge excuse that that's what happens to rooks in our offense. It's just an overwhelming learning process. After that disclaimer, you went on to nostradamus all the wonders that RR would do one day for us but that was based on what exactly? The horrible year the kid had that previously you tried selling as impressive?

Now, we take Janis, who didn't get the same treatment as RR did by you. The kid barely had a second of time in this offense and you panned him. Yet, RR didn't make one single play ALL SEASON anywhere near Janis' play in St. Louie nor will he ever because he runs like a DE not a deer. RR has very limited athleticism. If memory serves, RR's wonderlic was lower than JJ's. JJ is a smart kid with all world elite athleticism and we all saw it on display. We, if we watched, saw MM's face on JJ's KO return vs. KC. The guy was visibly moved by JJ's speed. He has an element not present on this team that would be quite useful.

Write all the highbrow praise you wish of RR...couldn't care less. Janis has some special to him. RR does not. RR is nothing but an adequate TE prospect much like Quarless. We have two middling TE's but don't let that stop you from promoting either as something more.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
9 years ago

Did Randall Cobb screw up on his first TD catch? It's fine that you don't like my views. I can handle that. The rest is all window dressing.

I like Jeff Janis...he is a Packer so you should love him and have him penciled into the HOF. Ironic, that because I like the guy he's super flawed. I would examine my posts closely and see if there wasn't something going on there.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



YOu don't "like" Jeff Janis. You hide under your covers at night and jerk to his picture. I mean, Jerry Rice, Randy Moss, Julio Jones and Terrell Owens? This guy couldn't even get on the field.

The guy is flawed, because he's not that good, despite his measurables. Not because of anything you say. Although frankly, if you said the sky was blue, I'd have to go outside and check just to be sure.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
9 years ago

YOu don't "like" Jeff Janis. You hide under your covers at night and jerk to his picture. I mean, Jerry Rice, Randy Moss, Julio Jones and Terrell Owens? This guy couldn't even get on the field.

The guy is flawed, because he's not that good, despite his measurables. Not because of anything you say. Although frankly, if you said the sky was blue, I'd have to go outside and check just to be sure.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



What is with the projection above? I asked previously...crickets. Now, here it is again. I have NEVER said Jeff Janis was like Rice, Moss, or Owens. I have said his measurables are similar to Julio Jones which are rare. That's all.

Yes, our shingled 7th rounder from a small school didn't get on the field. Oh no! Not that! That never happens in our draft and develop world that you of all people revel in.

How can you hate on this kid...he is a Packer. I don't get it. You all love your Packers and have each and every one's bust in your mind for Canton.

Welcome to THIS year. We'll see who is who and what is what. Janis will still be the fastest kid on our offensive roster and the strongest of all our skill guys. Man, it's awful I want a smart, strong, fast guy to succeed. I should be good with guys with far less attributes because that's what I've had to watch for the last how many years? Always push for better. I hope there is a kid with more than Janis has to offer next year.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
9 years ago

What is with the projection above? I asked previously...crickets. Now, here it is again. I have NEVER said Jeff Janis was like Rice, Moss, or Owens. I have said his measurables are similar to Julio Jones which are rare. That's all.

Yes, our shingled 7th rounder from a small school didn't get on the field. Oh no! Not that! That never happens in our draft and develop world that you of all people revel in.

How can you hate on this kid...he is a Packer. I don't get it. You all love your Packers and have each and every one's bust in your mind for Canton.

Welcome to THIS year. We'll see who is who and what is what. Janis will still be the fastest kid on our offensive roster and the strongest of all our skill guys. Man, it's awful I want a smart, strong, fast guy to succeed. I should be good with guys with far less attributes because that's what I've had to watch for the last how many years? Always push for better. I hope there is a kid with more than Janis has to offer next year.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



We have no complaints about Janis. We merely object to the manner in which you are conducting yourself in the discussion of this topic.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (9m) : Matt Lafleur on if Jaire will play again this season. "Yeah I don't know... he's been dealing with swelling."
    Mucky Tundra (1h) : After the way they played for most of the game yesterday, I don't see how you can sit anyone for the whole game
    Zero2Cool (4h) : I'd say play everyone. Going into playoffs at 7th seed on two game lose streak - yucky
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Do the Packers have any best players?
    beast (4h) : Play or Rest*
    beast (4h) : Should the Packers play or free their best players vs the Bears?
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should be 3 - 2 in the Division. Bonkers being swept by both Lions and Vikings. yikes
    go.pack.go. (6h) : All crazy stuff…and good point beast
    beast (6h) : Packers should be 0-5 in the division, can't say I saw that coming, even 1-4
    Zero2Cool (6h) : Sam Darnold 35 TD's ... another one
    Zero2Cool (6h) : Baker Mayfield, 39 TD's ... can't say I saw that one
    Zero2Cool (7h) : No matter who is playing as 7th, I think we want them to win. Get rid of 2nd seed haha
    go.pack.go. (7h) : That would be dhazer who was rooting for Minnesota
    beast (15h) : Well, Commanders are currently the 6th seed and Packers the 7th
    beast (15h) : Who was it in Chat, that wanted the Vikings to win (because Lions fans upset them) because Packers could not lose the 6th seed?
    beast (18h) : If Falcons win, Packers stay as the 6th seed and Falcons lead the NFCS, if they lose, Commanders 6th and Bucs take NFCS lead
    beast (18h) : Win or Loss, the NFCS is going down to week 18
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : if the Falcons win, how does that affect the overall NFC playoff picture? Does it mean that the NFC South comes down to week 18?
    beast (18h) : If Commanders win, the Packers drop to the 7th seed
    beast (23h) : Taylor still at it!
    beast (23h) : Colts get the ball and fumble turn over
    packerfanoutwest (23h) : Jets pull Aaron Rodgers for Tyrod Taylor
    Mucky Tundra (23h) : Colts-Giants now a tight one
    beast (29-Dec) : Still early, but Giants 14 to 3 over Colts
    beast (29-Dec) : With Broncos losing to the Bengals, Colts got to control their destiny for the 7th seed... looks like they're about to give it up
    Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : I believe Pickett is starting for Philly
    beast (29-Dec) : Is the Eagles QB Hurts playing? I forgot to check
    Zero2Cool (29-Dec) : Watson unlikely to play today.
    Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : Good job gpg!
    go.pack.go. (29-Dec) : I figured out the signature thing. I had to find a different hosting website
    Zero2Cool (28-Dec) : Packers elevated S Omar Brown.
    go.pack.go. (28-Dec) : I tried the [img][/img] but that didn’t work
    go.pack.go. (28-Dec) : How do I upload a picture to change my signature? I haven’t done it in years lol. I have the picture but can’t get it to work
    Mucky Tundra (28-Dec) : Saturday NFL games=the season is about to get serious
    Mucky Tundra (28-Dec) : Greg Gumbel passed away today after bout with cancer.
    buckeyepackfan (27-Dec) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,
    buckeyepackfan (27-Dec) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games
    Mucky Tundra (27-Dec) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋
    Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : I guess 3 games. Whatever
    Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
    Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
    Mucky Tundra (27-Dec) : Kanata, seek help! lol
    beast (27-Dec) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
    Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
    TheKanataThrilla (27-Dec) : That was terrible.
    TheKanataThrilla (27-Dec) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
    beast (27-Dec) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
    beast (27-Dec) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
    beast (27-Dec) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
    Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

    27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    27-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    27-Dec / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

    27-Dec / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

    27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.