Zero2Cool
9 years ago

There are so many examples of that aren't there? No they are not hiding anything. The truth is out there (hey, that would make a great tagline for a TV show) they are just not putting it out front. I'd say on a scale of 1-10 (1 being a total non issue) 10 being and absolute disgrace I would put this at a 2 or maybe 2.5 and the only reason I say that is because 19 other teams apparently didn't take money and I would like to think the Packers would be leading the way in issues like this.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



If you are going to spend tax payers money, are you going to spend it on each of the 32 NFL teams or the teams that get the most viewership? If you have a budget, which the military does, you select wisely. How the hell the Vikings got in there, no damn clue!!! But if I'm a person who wants to get my message out, I'm going to target the most bang for my buck.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

I guess you don't see that there is a difference between what is clearly a paid advertisement and leading the public to believe you're putting on displays of patriotism because you care about the military and want to "honor" them. It is not honoring when you're paid to do it.

It's an honor when a young lady accepts your request for a date. It is a dishonor when a prostitute takes your money for one but you guys don't seem to be able to reconcile huge differences in approaches.

As for Ted Thompson, you choose not to get it... you guys constantly credit him for things that are actually the opposite of reality. Why can't I choose to be like you guys and blame him for something that he doesn't deserve blame for? It's no different than what you do it's just in reverse. Again, you don't see the differences just like in the paid vs. not paid thing. There is a HUGE difference.

Take your date home to mom and she's all happy thinking you found a nice girl...then tell her later she was actually a whore you paid to be on your arm at the get together. Is mama going to think the same about it? You guys sure want to think the same about what the Packers did. None of you knew those oh so patriotic displays were really paid infomercials. It did your heart good to see our org be so honoring to our military. We come to find out there was no honor in it at all...only money. Money whoring as I think nerd would probably call it. Yet, you want to say it's not an issue...there's nothing wrong with it even though what you thought is light years from reality. There is some irony in that all by itself but it's surely lost on you.

Honestly, I'm amazed at how you guys look at things. The things you don't see.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



There is a difference between honoring troops who have already served and providing recruiting services for young men who may be interested in serving in the future.

It's no different than if the Badgers wanted to recruit young athletes for their various programs.

No NFL team has to be PAID in order to honor troops who have either served or sacrificed in combat. Get real.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
steveishere
9 years ago

I guess you don't see that there is a difference between what is clearly a paid advertisement and leading the public to believe you're putting on displays of patriotism because you care about the military and want to "honor" them. It is not honoring when you're paid to do it.

It's an honor when a young lady accepts your request for a date. It is a dishonor when a prostitute takes your money for one but you guys don't seem to be able to reconcile huge differences in approaches.

As for Ted Thompson, you choose not to get it... you guys constantly credit him for things that are actually the opposite of reality. Why can't I choose to be like you guys and blame him for something that he doesn't deserve blame for? It's no different than what you do it's just in reverse. Again, you don't see the differences just like in the paid vs. not paid thing. There is a HUGE difference.

Take your date home to mom and she's all happy thinking you found a nice girl...then tell her later she was actually a whore you paid to be on your arm at the get together. Is mama going to think the same about it? You guys sure want to think the same about what the Packers did. None of you knew those oh so patriotic displays were really paid infomercials. It did your heart good to see our org be so honoring to our military. We come to find out there was no honor in it at all...only money. Money whoring as I think nerd would probably call it. Yet, you want to say it's not an issue...there's nothing wrong with it even though what you thought is light years from reality. There is some irony in that all by itself but it's surely lost on you.

Honestly, I'm amazed at how you guys look at things. The things you don't see.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



If blaming Ted Thompson for soething you know he has absolutely nothing to do with makes you every bit as much of an idiot as you think those who give him undue credit for things are, why would you still choose to do it? Seems more like you are just obsessed. You cant even discuss anything about this team you supposedly care about or any of the players on it without spending most or all of your words on tt. I dont see how you can even enjoy the game at this point. Maybe its time to take a step back or find a different team to pull for until evil ted is gone.
sschind
9 years ago

If you are going to spend tax payers money, are you going to spend it on each of the 32 NFL teams or the teams that get the most viewership? If you have a budget, which the military does, you select wisely. How the hell the Vikings got in there, no damn clue!!! But if I'm a person who wants to get my message out, I'm going to target the most bang for my buck.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I understand that completely and I agree. If I am spending money promoting my service I want to spend it where it will be seen. What I don't know is if the same money was offered to all teams and only the 14 accepted it and the others did it on their own or what. I don't believe that these 14 teams were the only ones to honor the military so if the military only gave money to these 14 teams who paid for the ones they didn't give the money to?

I would have a hard time believing the military would say something like "we will give money to the Packers and not the Jaguars because more people watch the Packer games." I'd like to know if this is something that the military offers to all teams and only some take advantage of it or if it is only offered to select teams.


nerdmann
9 years ago

I understand that completely and I agree. If I am spending money promoting my service I want to spend it where it will be seen. What I don't know is if the same money was offered to all teams and only the 14 accepted it and the others did it on their own or what. I don't believe that these 14 teams were the only ones to honor the military so if the military only gave money to these 14 teams who paid for the ones they didn't give the money to?

I would have a hard time believing the military would say something like "we will give money to the Packers and not the Jaguars because more people watch the Packer games." I'd like to know if this is something that the military offers to all teams and only some take advantage of it or if it is only offered to select teams.


Originally Posted by: sschind 



Seemed from the article it was more National Guard.

So like the WI National Guard would be likely to advertise with the Pack, because they have like a 96% viewership in NE Wisconsin, and very high in the rest of the state. But the Florida National Guard might not invest as heavily in the Jags, because, well no one cares about them.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
sschind
9 years ago

Seemed from the article it was more National Guard.

So like the WI National Guard would be likely to advertise with the Pack, because they have like a 96% viewership in NE Wisconsin, and very high in the rest of the state. But the Florida National Guard might not invest as heavily in the Jags, because, well no one cares about them.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I'm seeing that more now and if it is the national guard that would make sense. I wouldn't expect the WI national guard to advertise with any team other than the Packers.

I'd still like to know who pays for the tributes when performed by the other 18 teams who didn't take any money from the military. Maybe its private donations or corporate sponsors or maybe the team picks up the tab. All in all I'd rather see the Packers on the not taking money list than on the taking money list but I don't think it is a big deal.

Cheesey
9 years ago
I seriously think that Uffda just does this stuff to see who he can get a rise out of. I don't think even he believes half of what he says.

And maybe, just maybe, he wrote Ted several times, and Ted didn't reply to him. So he's ticked off at him and wants to blame EVERYTHING on him! You know....."slighted lover" thing???😝

And maybe they advertised with the Vikings, because they know that Vikings fans are vunerable. You know, they don't have anything to do after the regular season is over.😂 🤣
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
9 years ago
Skimming through some of the posts and then it came to my why the Vikings were used. Duh, they play the Packers twice a season!!
UserPostedImage
greengold
9 years ago

I seriously think that Uffda just does this stuff to see who he can get a rise out of. I don't think even he believes half of what he says.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 


That's the definition of a troll. I won't argue with you.



mi_keys
9 years ago

Skimming through some of the posts and then it came to my why the Vikings were used. Duh, they play the Packers twice a season!!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I thought it had something to do with the idea that people just can't look away from train wrecks...
Born and bred a cheesehead
Fan Shout
TheKanataThrilla (2h) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
TheKanataThrilla (2h) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
Zero2Cool (3h) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Excellent Source: The Bears have a deal in place to move up to 5 if Jeanty is there.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick
dfosterf (5h) : But it is still not tonight. Lol
wpr (5h) : Today is finally here.
dfosterf (6h) : I should have put it in quotes
dfosterf (6h) : It is the title of a you tube video.
dfosterf (6h) : I'm not assuming anything
beast (12h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?
dfosterf (18h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (18h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (18h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (23-Apr) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (23-Apr) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
48m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

5h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.