Meet your 2014 Green Bay Packers!· Page 8

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

QCHuskerFan
Member

10 years ago

Pickett has played 13 years. Guion just 6. Thats one obvious major difference.

Last year's run D started well and then faded. At the end of the year, it was the big weakness. Why, oh why, would we want the same players back? Move on. It might be worse, but not likely. Jolly's old and hurt. Pickett is ancient. I respect what they have provided us, but it's a game of replacement. Young and cheap is better than old and broken.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

nerdmann
Premier Member

10 years ago

#72

Originally Posted by: QCHuskerFan

Why? Because we lost Raji for the year.

Hope Guion can get it done.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

steveishere
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#73

Pickett was a starter. Guion is a career journeyman.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Over the last 3 years Guion has played 501, 509, and 397 snaps. Pickett has played 466, 582, and 499. Not seeing where there's a large difference in playing time there. Nobody is saying Guion is some great player or anything but Pickett pretty much sucked last year. Why does Raji being gone make you want to bring back a player that sucked?

steveishere
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#74

Why? Because we lost Raji for the year.

Hope Guion can get it done.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Well we already know that Pickett can't unless you think he's going to improve in his 14th season after his play declining the last couple years and missing all off season practices this year.

nerdmann
Premier Member

10 years ago

#75

Originally Posted by: steveishere

He was quite stout last year, until he got hurt.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

QCHuskerFan
Member

10 years ago

#76

He was quite stout last year, until he got hurt.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

He was stout on the #25 Rush defense. He's played a huge number of plays in his 13 years. So despite being average on a bad line, and despite the fact he is in NFL terms ancient, he's the best option for the Pack to get better?

If we're going to ignore actual performance, let's bring back Nitschke. Huge upgrade over Hawk! Pair him with Robinson. Then we have some of the best to ever play!

Don't forget. In a league that is always looking for 'Big guys', Pickett and Jolly are sitting at home. Nobody wants them.

Time to move on.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

nerdmann
Premier Member

10 years ago

#77

Originally Posted by: QCHuskerFan

I'm not the one ignoring actual performance. They weren't #25 until the end of the season.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

steveishere
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#78

I'm not the one ignoring actual performance. They weren't #25 until the end of the season.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Dude usually plays like 20 snaps a game. Pickett wasn't THE reason they were #25 at the end of the season but he wasn't THE reason they were in the top 10 earlier in the season, he's just a guy out there who is only in the way on anything but a run up the middle. There are plenty of teams that could use a good NT that can move and 0 teams that were interested in Pickett even on 90 man rosters, he has no off field concerns and is by all accounts a great teammate so maybe that tells you how useful he is at this point.

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#79

I respect the everliving shit out of Pickett, but it was and is time to move on. There is a new group of guys here with something to prove.

Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance

nerdmann
Premier Member

10 years ago

#80

I respect the everliving shit out of Pickett, but it was and is time to move on. There is a new group of guys here with something to prove.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules

Yep. Then we lost our starter.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

buckeyepackfan (4h) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,

buckeyepackfan (4h) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋

Zero2Cool (7h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever

Zero2Cool (7h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.

Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Kanata, seek help! lol

beast (10h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (11h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (11h) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (11h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

beast (11h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent

beast (11h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime

beast (11h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing

Zero2Cool (12h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is

Zero2Cool (12h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true

beast (13h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management

wpr (15h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Mucky Tundra (22h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (23h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (26-Dec) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS