DoddPower
10 years ago

Whenever I see stats like this I always wonder why they chose that particular year. Why choose 2010. Why not 2009 or 2008 or 2011?

Of those on the list only the Saints had more wins than the Packers in 2009 so it would look even better for the Packers if they went back to 2009. Can't do 2008 though because we only won 6 games that year.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



Why not choose 1990 or 1972? A specific date has to be picked and in this case it's just meant to be somewhat representative of recent history, I suppose. Perhaps the best thing would be to show multiple time frames for a more complete picture.
mi_keys
10 years ago

Because he's Dhazer and he paints whatever picture he wants. That's just what he does, especially if it somehow lessens any accomplishment the Packers have had, for some reason. Just a real negative guy, I suppose. It probably extends beyond just the NFL.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



I know. I've been here long enough to know he does that. Doesn't mean I don't like pointing out the bullshit.
Born and bred a cheesehead
dhazer
10 years ago

Because he's Dhazer and he paints whatever picture he wants. That's just what he does, especially if it somehow lessens any accomplishment the Packers have had, for some reason. Just a real negative guy, I suppose. It probably extends beyond just the NFL.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 





ok the Packers had a 15 win season in there that throws off the whole thing


10-6
15-1
11-5
8-7-1


Then look at the Pats

14-2
13-3
12-4
12-4

Ummm what team looks more constant? Btw Look at the Pats record back to 2001 when Brady took over. The worst record was 9-7 and only missed the playoffs twice and one of the times they missed the playoffs their record was 11-5 with a backup qb all season.

They average 12.5 wins a year now thats impressive. Even though they did cheat lol
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
10 years ago

ok the Packers had a 15 win season in there that throws off the whole thing


10-6
15-1
11-5
8-7-1


Then look at the Pats

14-2
13-3
12-4
12-4

Ummm what team looks more constant? Btw Look at the Pats record back to 2001 when Brady took over. The worst record was 9-7 and only missed the playoffs twice and one of the times they missed the playoffs their record was 11-5 with a backup qb all season.

They average 12.5 wins a year now thats impressive. Even though they did cheat lol

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



Yeah, and we have an 8 win season in there. The average is 11 and the median is 10.5.

The pats are the exception with their consistency. That's why we still have the second best record over that time period. Now let's win another title this year and make it count for something.
Born and bred a cheesehead
dhazer
10 years ago

Yeah, and we have an 8 win season in there. The average is 11 and the median is 10.5.

The pats are the exception with their consistency. That's why we still have the second best record over that time period. Now let's win another title this year and make it count for something.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 



Looking at it all and I guess regular season don't mean shit as long as you make the playoffs

going back to the 2008 season the average super bowl winner had 11 wins in the season so i guess we are right on average
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
10 years ago

Looking at it all and I guess regular season don't mean shit as long as you make the playoffs

going back to the 2008 season the average super bowl winner had 11 wins in the season so i guess we are right on average

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



Get in and anything can happen. Especially with the parity in the league these days.
Born and bred a cheesehead
nerdmann
10 years ago

Get in and anything can happen. Especially with the parity in the league these days.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 



1: Get in.

2: Get a week off.

3: Get a home game.

4: Home field advantage.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
sschind
10 years ago

Why not choose 1990 or 1972? A specific date has to be picked and in this case it's just meant to be somewhat representative of recent history, I suppose. Perhaps the best thing would be to show multiple time frames for a more complete picture.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Yeah but usually when they make such comments they are trying to make a specific point about something. If they are trying to show the Packers specifically why not do your full research and go back one more year which would make the stats look even better. Maybe he was trying to show the Patriots in a better light so he chose 2010. That's why I said I wonder why he chose that year. You are right though. It could have just been chosen at random.
buckeyepackfan
10 years ago
Composite NFL Standings since the AFL/NFL merger
by organization (not franchise) through team and location changes.
Fall of 1970 through 2/2/2014

http://home.jps.net/~fos/nfl/post1969nfl.html 


Or there is this.

http://home.jps.net/~fos/nfl/nfl.htm 
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
play2win
10 years ago



[list=1]
  • Patriots (51-13)
  • Packers (44-19-1)
  • 49ers (42-21-1)
  • Ravens (42-22)
  • Saints (42-22)
  • Falcons (40-24)
  • Steelers (40-24)[/list]

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


  • It is pretty impressive, all things considering. And, as nerdmann said, this with Rodgers being out a significant 6 games last season. Now, to better our playoff record. Maybe that starts this season!
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
    dfosterf (4h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
    beast (6h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
    Zero2Cool (23h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
    beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
    beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
    wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
    wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
    wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
    beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
    beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
    beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
    beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
    beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
    wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
    beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
    beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
    beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.