GD it! Why can't people read everything I write instead of honking off based on one statement.

Originally Posted by: Wade 

I would rather Mike Neal than DeMarcus Ware, not based on talent, but the cost. Ware has hit his ceiling and if Mike Neal can stay healthy, he might raise the roof. Depending on the contract details, I'm glad Neal is staying. I don't think this made the team better, but I do think not having Neal made the team worse.


One question I have is Mike Neal gonna be playing outside linebacker or is gonna be moved back to the defensive line? The Packers are reportedly trying to mold personnel into Dom Capers "image" and Neal on the line would make more sense then.


"I still think the best thing, in my opinion, that Mike Neal does is rush from a '3' technique, particular in third down in the sub package," head coach Mike McCarthy said. "I think he's a real force in there."

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

They might move him around and move him in multiple looks. I'm glad he's back. I'd like to see us acquire one more pass rusher to compete for and potentially win the other starting OLB/primary pass rusher opposite of Matthews.

If our pass rushing rotation was Matthews, someone else yet to be acquired, Perry and Neal I think we would be in good shape (if we stayed healthy... knock on every piece of wood in a 10 mile radius).

Originally Posted by: mi_keys