VinceLambeauStarr
11 years ago
Morning all,

The last time a seismic change occurred in our defense was on the back of a 6-10 season. We changed to 3-4, canned Sanders and bought in Dirty Dom. The starting base defensive 11 in 2008 was

Kampman
Jolly
Pickett
Jenkins (IR'd)
Hawk
Barnett (IR'd)
Poppinga
Harris
Woodson
Bigby
Collins

We changed to a 3-4, and though their was immediate improvement, the growing pains were obvious (Steelers, Cardinals etc).

Now, my question to y'all is, with the current personnel on board, how best to further develop the current defensive crop. Would you rather switch to a 4-3 (Daniels, Perry, Neal, Maybe Jones would PROBABLY Benefit from this change), or do we stick with the 3-4, Capers or not, and keep looking to add pieces to make this unit competitive again.

I would love a change, personally, for better or worse. You can't expect to do the same things over and over again and expect different results.

UserPostedImage 
Zero2Cool is my captain.
nerdmann
11 years ago
Philosophically, I like the 3-4 better. There's more surprise involved, and I feel like it's a more aggressive philosophy.

That said, more teams are running it now, so it might be easier to pick up 4-3 players. Indeed, we have a roster full of them.

Btw, I've heard Poppinga is still in Green Bay. He's keeping in shape and supposedly claims he could still play. Just sayin.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago
The thing I take from VLS's original post is that Sander's last defense (did we really go just 6-10 that season?) had a LOT better personnel than the current team - and being plain vanilla and poorly handled, it screwed up pretty royally. Capers came in - with virtually the same personnel then - and improved things greatly his first couple of years. Then, things were allowed (by our greatly esteemed - around here - GM) to go down hill. Just look at what we have starting now compared to what we had starting then.

I actually prefer a 4-3 philosophically. When Capers came in, I was kinda negative about the prospects of jumping to a 3-4. I quickly came around, however, based on the success those first two Capers 3-4 seasons.

The bottom line is, when your personnel is substandard - as the Packers D is (along with the O-Line, backup QB, and RB until this season), you need to do something to compensate. Capers' genius/schemes turned mediocre personnel into a tough defense then. Now, he turns abjectly bad personnel into a mediocre defense. If you think it's bad now, just imagine what we'd have with plain vanilla or whatever - today's personnel WITHOUT Capers' schemes.

Thanks again, Ted.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
nerdmann
11 years ago

The thing I take from VLS's original post is that Sander's last defense (did we really go just 6-10 that season?) had a LOT better personnel than the current team - and being plain vanilla and poorly handled, it screwed up pretty royally. Capers came in - with virtually the same personnel then - and improved things greatly his first couple of years. Then, things were allowed (by our greatly esteemed - around here - GM) to go down hill. Just look at what we have starting now compared to what we had starting then.

I actually prefer a 4-3 philosophically. When Capers came in, I was kinda negative about the prospects of jumping to a 3-4. I quickly came around, however, based on the success those first two Capers 3-4 seasons.

The bottom line is, when your personnel is substandard - as the Packers D is (along with the O-Line, backup QB, and RB until this season), you need to do something to compensate. Capers' genius/schemes turned mediocre personnel into a tough defense then. Now, he turns abjectly bad personnel into a mediocre defense. If you think it's bad now, just imagine what we'd have with plain vanilla or whatever - today's personnel WITHOUT Capers' schemes.

Thanks again, Ted.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



Capers has a track record of coming in, putting up excellent numbers, then coasting for the next few years. Was Ted his GM everywhere he's coached?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (8h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (8h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (11h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (12h) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (12h) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (13h) : Thank you
wpr (13h) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (13h) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (13h) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (13h) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (13h) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (13h) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (13h) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (14h) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (14h) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (14h) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Bears are finalizing a deal to hire Ben Johnson as their head coach. (via @tompelissero )
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Looks like Lions OC Ben Johnson is going to be the Bears coach
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

13h / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.