Packers fans surely remember the screw job in Seattle last season, but another screw job happened last night during the Giants and Redskins game. Late in the game the Redskins are making an effort to score to tie the game. I don't exactly remember the specifics, but I think it was on 3rd down and the Redskins got close to a first down. One of the referee's said it was a first down, they moved the chains and the down box flipped to 1. I think the Redskins threw it deep on 1st down and it was incomplete to Fred Davis, meaning 2nd and 10, but nooooo, the referee said it was 4th and short.
This blunder falls solely on the referee's in my opinion, but it's brought up the whole "referees suck" thing again.
This isn't my first time mentioning the inordinate
amount of rules , but I strongly feel less rules = more gooder football.
There are too many judgement calls. Hell, who knows what is a catch anymore? There's just too many rules that have a gray area for judgement. Then you have 16 officiating crews with what is it, six or eight people on each? That just seems to be asking a lot for everyone to be on the same page.
And truth to be told, I think we would all be happy if the referee's would just be consistent.
I'm leaning towards its the amount of rules with a gray area that are more the problem than those trying to decipher who broke what rule. Sooner or later, we're gonna have to have lawyers only as referee's because no one else is gonna be able to understand all of the rules.
What do you think? Is its rules more than officials, or officials more than rules?