Packers have 8 DL who have played well enough to possibly be in the top 53. But it's not just about the best 53, it's also a game of numbers where teams keep so many at each position. Such as the Packers are going to keep a back-up TE even if one isn't a part of the top 53 guys.

So lets say we have these 8 DL, and the coaches feel they can only keep 7 ... who would you cut?

MM said Neal is a DE, so I'm counting him here. And even if you move him to OLB then both number drop, 7 DL players with only 6 spots.


So who would you cut of these...

Boyd, Daniels, Jolly, Jones, Neal, Pickett, Raji, Wilson

---

Packers have 8 DL who have played well enough to possibly be in the top 53. But it's not just about the best 53, it's also a game of numbers where teams keep so many at each position. Such as the Packers are going to keep a back-up TE even if one isn't a part of the top 53 guys.

So lets say we have these 8 DL, and the coaches feel they can only keep 7 ... who would you cut?

MM said Neal is a DE, so I'm counting him here. And even if you move him to OLB then both number drop, 7 DL players with only 6 spots.


So who would you cut of these...

Boyd, Daniels, Jolly, Jones, Neal, Pickett, Raji, Wilson

---

Well out of those it would be in this order of first to cut to last.

1. Neal
2. Jolly
3. Daniels
4. Wilson
5. Jones
6. Raji
7. Pickett

---

I also had Boyd in there as well as a poll with all 8 of them... that didn't seem to show up when I looked this time.

---

Wilson, maybe Boyd.

---

Cut boyd, after he clears waivers you sign him to PS.

---

Boyd will probably be the one to go. Wilson on the watch list.

---