Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago

They can't get college refs because the pro refs' union (the NFLRA) also controls the college refs. And they've let it be known that anyone who crosses the picket line won't have their college gig to go back to once the lockout is over.

College refs did step in the last time the refs went on strike (in 2001?). The BCS refs stepped in and were competent enough that the regular refs weren't missed. It cost the refs a lot of bargaining power, so the NFLRA is making sure it doesn't happen again.

Originally Posted by: Since69 



And so if we want to complain about the quality of the replacements, we have to put a big share of the blame on the pro refs themselves.

Hmm.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
PackerTraxx
12 years ago

They can't get college refs because the pro refs' union (the NFLRA) also controls the college refs. And they've let it be known that anyone who crosses the picket line won't have their college gig to go back to once the lockout is over.

College refs did step in the last time the refs went on strike (in 2001?). The BCS refs stepped in and were competent enough that the regular refs weren't missed. It cost the refs a lot of bargaining power, so the NFLRA is making sure it doesn't happen again.

Originally Posted by: Since69 



Thanks for the clarification.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
gbguy20
12 years ago

They can't get college refs because the pro refs' union (the NFLRA) also controls the college refs. And they've let it be known that anyone who crosses the picket line won't have their college gig to go back to once the lockout is over.

College refs did step in the last time the refs went on strike (in 2001?). The BCS refs stepped in and were competent enough that the regular refs weren't missed. It cost the refs a lot of bargaining power, so the NFLRA is making sure it doesn't happen again.

Originally Posted by: Since69 



This is accurate except for one huge issue. There are college refs working as replacement officials in the NFL right now. Replace the word "College" with "Division 1" and your post becomes correct.

Anywho, I like the idea of kneeing on every play, doing some sort on the field strike to kick the owners squarely in the nuts. But, I would much rather the Packers use that as a fire under their butt to punish the NFL by RUNNING THE FUCK OVER every opponent they face for the rest of this season. Use this as fuel to wake the fuck up and make a statement. We're not going to take any shit. You held us down and shit in our mouth last week, now we're going to face fuck all of you from here on out. With this mentality we won't be in the position to be fucked over by the refs again.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
gbguy20
12 years ago

I heard on a newscast yesterday that one of the things the owners want is full time refs. Which I believe is a good idea. Any one else know about this? The regular refs we have now are part time with mostly some kind of professional full time occupation. So does anybody know what the ramifications are both ways as to these factors?

Originally Posted by: PackerTraxx 



The NFL wants 7 full time referees, one from each position on the field. They will pay these guys to focus on ways to improve the way they do things, and to develop further/train the other refs in the league who are in the same position as they are. Basically a way to improve officiating one position at a time.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Yerko
12 years ago
I must be the only one on the side of the real officials. Maybe they are asking for a tad too much, but why not? Look at who they are working for. Most of these original officials (Hochuli to name one) are full-time employees elsewhere. Who knows what exactly they do (Hochuli has his own law office, lol) but these guys are taking additional time out of their lives to go officiate NFL games over the weekends and now during the week (Monday and Thursday games).
I'd be asking for more money as well, especially with the leverage of "there aren't many people out there that can do our job." The proof is in the pudding and every week their leverage is getting stronger. Before you blame the officials asking for more, again...look at their employer and realize how much money they make a year.

And yes, I understand that there are other part-time NFL employees that do not receive what these officials are asking for, but what position do these other part-timers hold?

Being an NFL official does not come off as an easy gig, at all. Pay em.


UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago

I must be the only one on the side of the real officials. Maybe they are asking for a tad too much, but why not? Look at who they are working for. Most of these original officials (Hochuli to name one) are full-time employees elsewhere. Who knows what exactly they do (Hochuli has his own law office, lol) but these guys are taking additional time out of their lives to go officiate NFL games over the weekends and now during the week (Monday and Thursday games).
I'd be asking for more money as well, especially with the leverage of "there aren't many people out there that can do our job." The proof is in the pudding and every week their leverage is getting stronger. Before you blame the officials asking for more, again...look at their employer and realize how much money they make a year.

And yes, I understand that there are other part-time NFL employees that do not receive what these officials are asking for, but what position do these other part-timers hold?

Being an NFL official does not come off as an easy gig, at all. Pay em.

Originally Posted by: G-Force 



I too have tuck up for them after Monday night. they are far from perfect but they are better than HS refs.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago
NFL won’t fine Packers players 

After Monday night’s debacle in Seattle, Packers left guard T.J. Lang tweeted: “Fine me and use the money to pay the regular refs.”

Well, neither Lang nor any other Packers players will have to cough up any money.

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said in an email to the Press-Gazette that “we’re not looking at that” when asked whether any players would be fined for their comments or tweets.

Lang, right guard Josh Sitton and quarterback Aaron Rodgers were among the more outspoken Packers players after the officials ruled that Seahawks receiver Golden Tate caught the game-winning touchdown after it appeared M.D. Jennings intercepted the ball.

Rodgers, in his weekly radio show on ESPN Milwaukee, said: “First of all, I have to do something that the NFL is not going to do, and I have to apologize to the fans. Our sport is generated, the multi-billion dollar machine is generated by people coming to watch us play. And the product that is on the field is not being complemented by an appropriate set of officials. The games are getting out of control.”



UserPostedImage
gbguy20
12 years ago

I must be the only one on the side of the real officials. Maybe they are asking for a tad too much, but why not? Look at who they are working for. Most of these original officials (Hochuli to name one) are full-time employees elsewhere. Who knows what exactly they do (Hochuli has his own law office, lol) but these guys are taking additional time out of their lives to go officiate NFL games over the weekends and now during the week (Monday and Thursday games).
I'd be asking for more money as well, especially with the leverage of "there aren't many people out there that can do our job." The proof is in the pudding and every week their leverage is getting stronger. Before you blame the officials asking for more, again...look at their employer and realize how much money they make a year.

And yes, I understand that there are other part-time NFL employees that do not receive what these officials are asking for, but what position do these other part-timers hold?

Being an NFL official does not come off as an easy gig, at all. Pay em.

Originally Posted by: G-Force 



wait what? I haven't come across anyone who isn't on the side of the real officials.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (7h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (12h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (21h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.