Zero2Cool
12 years ago
Want to Chat Packers? Click GameDay Chat !

UserPostedImage
Green Bay Packers ( 0 - 1 )
[list]
  • Total Offense = 19th
  • Passing Offense = 11th
  • Rushing Offense = 27th

  • Total Defense = 21st
  • Passing Defense = 6th
  • Rushing Defense = 31st

  • Points For = 22.0 (19th)
  • Points Against = 30.0 (23rd)[/list]


  • UserPostedImage
    Chicago Bears ( 1 - 0 )
    [list]
  • Total Offense = 6th
  • Passing Offense = 3rd
  • Rushing Offense = 14th

  • Total Defense = 18th
  • Passing Defense = 26th
  • Rushing Defense = 8th

  • Points For = 41.0 (3rd)
  • Points Against = 21.0 (13th)[/list]

  • Chicago Bears ENEMY FORUMS! 
    UserPostedImage
    yooperfan
    12 years ago
    I hate that the Packers have to play this game on 3 days rest (I don't give a damn that the Bears have to).
    The Packers coaching staff have some big adjustments to make following the Niners game,particularly on defense.
    Hopefully they come up with something, and quick, or this could be a review of ugly.
    Zero2Cool
    12 years ago

    I hate that the Packers have to play this game on 3 days rest (I don't give a damn that the Bears have to).
    The Packers coaching staff have some big adjustments to make following the Niners game,particularly on defense.
    Hopefully they come up with something, and quick, or this could be a review of ugly.

    Originally Posted by: yooperfan 



    I don't feel the Packers have big adjustments to make. From what I seen, they need to execute better and they'll be good.
    UserPostedImage
    LambeauEast
    12 years ago
    I agree, there are no adjustments to be made...they won't help. Man I really don't want to see another game in just 4 days, it can't be a good outcome in my opinion. I'll just go with last week's prediction.

    Bears - 27
    Packers - 24

    I hope I'm wrong, obviously.
    UserPostedImage
    yooperfan
    12 years ago

    I agree, there are no adjustments to be made...they won't help. Man I really don't want to see another game in just 4 days, it can't be a good outcome in my opinion. I'll just go with last week's prediction.

    Bears - 27
    Packers - 24

    I hope I'm wrong, obviously.

    Originally Posted by: LambeauEast 



    "No adjustments", really, there are always adjustments to be made.
    The Packers run defense sucks and the communication in the secondary is terrible.
    Definately some big adjustments to be made possibly including personnel in the secondary.
    The Packers run blocking is nonexistant, needs some adjustment, possibly including the coaching.

    I certainly hope you are wrong about the outcome.

    Zero2Cool
    12 years ago

    "No adjustments", really, there are always adjustments to be made.
    The Packers run defense sucks and the communication in the secondary is terrible.
    Definitely some big adjustments to be made possibly including personnel in the secondary.
    The Packers run blocking is nonexistant, needs some adjustment, possibly including the coaching.

    I certainly hope you are wrong about the outcome.

    Originally Posted by: yooperfan 


    You're arguing semantics here. Obviously adjustments are done from series to series. Communication is an execution issue, not an adjustment issue.

    I didn't care for seeing Jarrett Bush out there so much. Then they plugged in Sam Shields and went back an forth. Either stay with Bush or stay with Shields. Go all in with one of them.

    The big adjustments comment is a bit overboard in my opinion. This was the first game of the season and we fans were spoiled. It's time to be grounded and be realistic.
    UserPostedImage
    vikesrule
    12 years ago
    UserPostedImage 


    Patiently awaiting zombieslayer's prognostication.....

    yooperfan
    12 years ago

    You're arguing semantics here. Obviously adjustments are done from series to series. Communication is an execution issue, not an adjustment issue.

    I didn't care for seeing Jarrett Bush out there so much. Then they plugged in Sam Shields and went back an forth. Either stay with Bush or stay with Shields. Go all in with one of them.

    The big adjustments comment is a bit overboard in my opinion. This was the first game of the season and we fans were spoiled. It's time to be grounded and be realistic.

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



    So you don't think there are game to game adjustments?
    It is time to be realistic.

    Zero2Cool
    12 years ago

    So you don't think there are game to game adjustments?
    It is time to be realistic.

    Originally Posted by: yooperfan 



    Yes sir, that is what I was saying was obvious as there are adjustments from series to series. I should have taken that further to be more clear and said adjustments are made from series to series as well as game to game. The point I was making was there always small adjustments. The tone I am getting from WE NEED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS! is the Packers need to make BIG adjustments. I do not agree with that. They need to EXECUTE better because no adjustment is going to make up for lack of execution.
    UserPostedImage
    zombieslayer
    12 years ago

    UserPostedImage 


    Patiently awaiting zombieslayer's prognostication.....

    Originally Posted by: vikesrule 



    I'm not predicting this game. We'll split with each of our NFC North division opponents. You had your chance to win something big. I would have said sweep + points. Too late now.

    The real Packers have showed their hand. Too many fans here are giving the Niners credit. No, the Niners are good, but that's it. They're not gonna win the conference. It's just the Packers are an average team.

    We over-achieved last year and this year, it's the same crap defensively. We'll once again have an elite O and a crappy D, and go one and done.

    I watched da Bears game and they looked like they were having fun out there. But you never know with 🇦🇷. He might just throw 5 TD passes and win the game for us. Or, he might have an average day.

    Either way, the D will stink and allow 25+ points. It's all up to 🇦🇷 to win this game.
    My man Donald Driver
    UserPostedImage
    (thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
    2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
    Users browsing this topic
      Fan Shout
      beast (18m) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
      beast (5h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
      Zero2Cool (8h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
      Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
      Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
      Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
      beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
      Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
      dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
      beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
      Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
      Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
      beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
      beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
      dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
      dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
      wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
      wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
      wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
      dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
      Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
      Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
      Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
      dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
      beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
      beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
      beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
      Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
      beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
      beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
      wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
      wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
      wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
      Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
      Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
      Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
      beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
      beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
      beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
      Please sign in to use Fan Shout
      2024 Packers Schedule
      Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
      Eagles
      Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
      COLTS
      Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
      Titans
      Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
      VIKINGS
      Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
      Rams
      Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
      CARDINALS
      Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
      TEXANS
      Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
      Jaguars
      Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
      LIONS
      Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
      Bears
      Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
      49ERS
      Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
      DOLPHINS
      Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
      Lions
      Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
      Seahawks
      Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
      SAINTS
      Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
      Vikings
      Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
      BEARS
      Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
      Eagles
      Recent Topics
      8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

      20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

      25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

      21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

      21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

      20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

      20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

      20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

      19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

      18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

      17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

      16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

      Headlines
      Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.