[2012] Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

Want to Chat Packers? Click GameDay Chat !

Green Bay Packers ( 0 - 1 )
[list]

Total Offense = 19th

Passing Offense = 11th

Rushing Offense = 27th

Total Defense = 21st

Passing Defense = 6th

Rushing Defense = 31st

Points For = 22.0 (19th)

Points Against = 30.0 (23rd)[/list]

Chicago Bears ( 1 - 0 )
[list]

Total Offense = 6th

Passing Offense = 3rd

Rushing Offense = 14th

Total Defense = 18th

Passing Defense = 26th

Rushing Defense = 8th

Points For = 41.0 (3rd)

Points Against = 21.0 (13th)[/list]

Chicago Bears ENEMY FORUMS!

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

yooperfan
Veteran Member

12 years ago

I hate that the Packers have to play this game on 3 days rest (I don't give a damn that the Bears have to).
The Packers coaching staff have some big adjustments to make following the Niners game,particularly on defense.
Hopefully they come up with something, and quick, or this could be a review of ugly.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

I don't feel the Packers have big adjustments to make. From what I seen, they need to execute better and they'll be good.

LambeauEast
Rookie

12 years ago

I agree, there are no adjustments to be made...they won't help. Man I really don't want to see another game in just 4 days, it can't be a good outcome in my opinion. I'll just go with last week's prediction.

Bears - 27
Packers - 24

I hope I'm wrong, obviously.

yooperfan
Veteran Member

12 years ago

Originally Posted by: LambeauEast

"No adjustments", really, there are always adjustments to be made.
The Packers run defense sucks and the communication in the secondary is terrible.
Definately some big adjustments to be made possibly including personnel in the secondary.
The Packers run blocking is nonexistant, needs some adjustment, possibly including the coaching.

I certainly hope you are wrong about the outcome.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

"No adjustments", really, there are always adjustments to be made.
The Packers run defense sucks and the communication in the secondary is terrible.
Definitely some big adjustments to be made possibly including personnel in the secondary.
The Packers run blocking is nonexistant, needs some adjustment, possibly including the coaching.

I certainly hope you are wrong about the outcome.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

You're arguing semantics here. Obviously adjustments are done from series to series. Communication is an execution issue, not an adjustment issue.

I didn't care for seeing Jarrett Bush out there so much. Then they plugged in Sam Shields and went back an forth. Either stay with Bush or stay with Shields. Go all in with one of them.

The big adjustments comment is a bit overboard in my opinion. This was the first game of the season and we fans were spoiled. It's time to be grounded and be realistic.

vikesrule
Registered

12 years ago

Patiently awaiting zombieslayer's prognostication.....

yooperfan
Veteran Member

12 years ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

So you don't think there are game to game adjustments?
It is time to be realistic.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

So you don't think there are game to game adjustments?
It is time to be realistic.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Yes sir, that is what I was saying was obvious as there are adjustments from series to series. I should have taken that further to be more clear and said adjustments are made from series to series as well as game to game. The point I was making was there always small adjustments. The tone I am getting from WE NEED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS! is the Packers need to make BIG adjustments. I do not agree with that. They need to EXECUTE better because no adjustment is going to make up for lack of execution.

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#10

Patiently awaiting zombieslayer's prognostication.....

Originally Posted by: vikesrule

I'm not predicting this game. We'll split with each of our NFC North division opponents. You had your chance to win something big. I would have said sweep + points. Too late now.

The real Packers have showed their hand. Too many fans here are giving the Niners credit. No, the Niners are good, but that's it. They're not gonna win the conference. It's just the Packers are an average team.

We over-achieved last year and this year, it's the same crap defensively. We'll once again have an elite O and a crappy D, and go one and done.

I watched da Bears game and they looked like they were having fun out there. But you never know with 🇦🇷. He might just throw 5 TD passes and win the game for us. Or, he might have an average day.

Either way, the D will stink and allow 25+ points. It's all up to 🇦🇷 to win this game.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (2h) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh

dfosterf (2h) : Happy Birthday Dave!

Mucky Tundra (3h) : happy birthday dhazer

TheKanataThrilla (5h) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later

buckeyepackfan (6h) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!

buckeyepackfan (6h) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.

buckeyepackfan (6h) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.

packerfanoutwest (6h) : well, he was

TheKanataThrilla (6h) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL

Mucky Tundra (6h) : I think this games over

beast (7h) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs

Mucky Tundra (7h) : This game looks too big for Washington

packerfanoutwest (10h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns

packerfanoutwest (10h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts

packerfanoutwest (10h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,

beast (21h) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)

beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab

Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!

beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22