Finley catches challenge from Williams at tight end· Page 2

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

beast
Select Member

12 years ago

In any case, our best tight end (in my opinion) will be on IR to start the season. When he comes back, we have the complete offense back.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules

Do you mean Quarless?

Quarless might be the fastest and a good blocker (though he's struggled some from blocking out of the h-back role) but my big problem is he can't (or hasn't been able to) find and catch the dang ball.

And when you look at plays like that fake punt, sneaking in Flynn as a blocker to pass to a wide open Quarless only for Quarless to sight of the ball in the air, adjust, trip himself up and fall down... I've been wondering if his struggles to find the ball in the air might have to do with his vision and wonder if he needs contact lenses or something.

PackerTraxx
Senior Member

12 years ago

#12

Finley drives me nuts. The guy needs to shut up and produce. Let his play do the talking.

Originally Posted by: play2win

This. It wouldn't bother me if we traded him for a very good/premier DB, DL, or IL,; even if we had to include a mid round pick.

Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?

DakotaT
Select Member

12 years ago

#13

Apparently D.J. Williams is really coming along. The Packers have Andrew Quarless, who if he can recover could be good. And since Jermichael Finley is locked up this season and next, I wonder if we see Finley traded this coming draft day to free up something like ~$7 million. :)

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Finley will play out his contract, and then we will let him walk. There will be other players developed by then and he will be expendable. I doubt we trade him.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

12 years ago

#14

Finley drives me nuts. The guy needs to shut up and produce. Let his play do the talking.

Originally Posted by: play2win

55 catches, nearly 800 yards, 8 TD's and was second on the team in receptions of 20 or more yards. Check how many teams had players with similar stats.

He IS producing and he's not saying anything dastardly wrong. I think some of us just need to lighten up and look at things in perspective in regard to Finley.

RaiderPride
Senior Member

12 years ago

#15

He has a million reasons to want the ball. I do not blame him a bit for wanting the ball. I would love to see him rock the world this year and earn his incentives, but do it with your mouth shut please Mr.Finley.

2/22/2012: Signed a two-year, $14 million contract. The deal included a $1 million signing bonus. Another $1 million is available through incentives. Finley is eligible for $300,000 offseason workout bonuses in each season. 2012: $950,000 (+ $3.5 million roster bonus), 2013: $4.45 million (+ $3.5 million roster bonus due in March), 2014: Free Agent.

RP

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#16

This. It wouldn't bother me if we traded him for a very good/premier DB, DL, or IL,; even if we had to include a mid round pick.

Originally Posted by: PackerTraxx

This. I'd much rather have a solid defender than Finley. All talk and still, not an elite TE. (NE had not one, but two TEs who smoked Finley in production).

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

RaiderPride
Senior Member

12 years ago

#17

This. It wouldn't bother me if we traded him for a very good/premier DB, DL, or IL,; even if we had to include a mid round pick.

Originally Posted by: PackerTraxx

I must agree Traxx... The thought gets me fired up.

However... I may be wrong and often am, but... I can not remember the last time there was a "traditional" trade in the NFL. By traditional, I mean "In season, quality STARTER for quality STARTER both under contract for at least two years."

I see this in the NHL and MLB but not in the NFL.

Am I wrong on this??? I just can not remember one.

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

12 years ago

#18

This. I'd much rather have a solid defender than Finley. All talk and still, not an elite TE. (NE had not one, but two TEs who smoked Finley in production).

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

First, I'm in full agreement. A solid defender > Jermichael Finley, simply because the TE's the Packers have I feel could match his production between them, plus the strength of the Packers offense is the WR depth.

Second, Players and Coaches don't mind Finley's comments, why do we degrade his production because of it? Really makes you wonder.

The Patriots had one TE who smoked Finley and he smoked EVERYONE in the league, so that statement really holds water like a funnel.

Unless of course, you think 24 more receptions, 250 more yards and one less touchdown while also racking up several yards less per reception constitutes being "smoked".

If you're wondering, I'd rather have had Aaron Hernandez than Jermichael Finley. I think he's a better blocker and signed for less. 🙂

beast
Select Member

12 years ago

#19

This. I'd much rather have a solid defender than Finley. All talk and still, not an elite TE. (NE had not one, but two TEs who smoked Finley in production).

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

Those TEs aren't competing with the Packers WRs for the ball...

Also I don't follow the Patriots but I remember a lot more plays where Aaron Hernandez was wide like a WR than in like a TE.

TwinkieGorilla
Member

12 years ago

#20

"The only blemish on Finley's record was 13 drops, an extraordinarily high total for someone who had barely dropped a half dozen the three previous years."

I put that there for those who think Jermichael Finley's 2011 season was the normal in the drops department. Oh no, facts hurt!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Maybe it's not normal for him but it still begs the question: What the fuck, dude? Thirteen fucking drops?!?

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

buckeyepackfan (2h) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,

buckeyepackfan (2h) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games

Mucky Tundra (4h) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋

Zero2Cool (5h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever

Zero2Cool (5h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Kanata, seek help! lol

beast (8h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (8h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (9h) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (9h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

beast (9h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent

beast (9h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime

beast (9h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing

Zero2Cool (10h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is

Zero2Cool (10h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true

beast (11h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management

wpr (13h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Mucky Tundra (20h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (21h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (26-Dec) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS