nerdmann
12 years ago
NFL.com 

"I think it was the worst decision I made, quite honestly," Harlan told Green & Gold Today on Tuesday, via ESPNMilwaukee.com.



I agree. After they fired Rhodes after one season, it seemed like nobody wanted to touch the job with a ten foot pole. I suspect there were various reasons for this, one among them being that Rhodes apparently handed the keys to the franchise to his starting QB. So Sherman was a pretty good hire at that point. I don't think he was quite ready, but there weren't many takers for the position.

I don't think he reigned in the QB very well. But I think Sherman's main failing as a coach was that he brought in all his buddies as assistant coaches. Which wouldn't have been a big deal, but they all kind of sucked. Tom Rosseley especially. I also thought he unfairly scapegoated Ed Donnatell.

But yeah, his biggest failing was as a GM. LOL. If Grady Jackson hadn't fallen into his lap that year after being outright released due to weight issues, he'd really have been screwed. Remember when he drafted James Lee? LOL. Then there was the infamous pic of him sleeping at the combine. LOL.

"I was concerned that if a new man came in from the outside, (Sherman) might have trouble getting along with him, ..."



This concern turned out to be valid. It seemed like a blow to Sherman's ego when Ted was hired. You can't have that in an employee. It's not personal, it's about business.

Then there was this:

Harlan pointed to the long, contentious holdout of cornerback Mike McKenzie in 2004 as a breaking point. Sherman was frazzled heading into the season, according to Harlan, who stripped the coach of GM duties and named Ted Thompson to the role in 2005. No regrets there.


“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
12 years ago
After Ray Rhodes was fired, the Packers HC was not seen as something no one wanted to touch with a ten foot pole. Where do you come up with these self proclaimed facts? My gosh it's fascinating!

Bob Harlan has said several times having both GM and HC as one person was a mistake. And each time it was cited the Mike McKenzie dispute was the final straw. Bob Harlan is starting to repeat himself in old age! lol

I think Sherman was a decent coach, but he more so was feeding off the talent Ron Wolf handed him.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago


Bob Harlan regrets making Sherman GM




As do we all.

I didn't mind Sherman as HC but like Zero says he had a lot of talent to work with. it was pretty hard to screw it up.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
12 years ago
Hated Sherman as a GM. He was in way over his head because he couldn't draft worth a damn.

As a coach, I really like the power running game we had - but I though the defense and special teams were always soft. When Sherman's teams were punched in the mouth, they never seemed to punch back. Case in point, the Sapp hit on Clifton should have been answered with about 30 guys in a fist fight at midfield. Sherman was the only one with any balls to actually stand up to Sack.
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
12 years ago

Hated Sherman as a GM. He was in way over his head because he couldn't draft worth a damn.

As a coach, I really like the power running game we had - but I though the defense and special teams were always soft. When Sherman's teams were punched in the mouth, they never seemed to punch back. Case in point, the Sapp hit on Clifton should have been answered with about 30 guys in a fist fight at midfield. Sherman was the only one with any balls to actually stand up to Sack.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Too bad that power running game wasn't enough.

200 yards rushing, 7 sacks and 2 takeaways.

They still lost because Sherman tried to get an off sides call on 4th and 1. It resulted in a delay penalty and they punted into the end zone.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
nerdmann
12 years ago

Too bad that power running game wasn't enough.

200 yards rushing, 7 sacks and 2 takeaways.

They still lost because Sherman tried to get an off sides call on 4th and 1. It resulted in a delay penalty and they punted into the end zone.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



It's definitely become a passing league, even moreso now than in Sherman's time.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
LambeauEast
12 years ago
As has been said, I didn't mind Sherman as HC, but he was over his head as GM.

U-71
UserPostedImage
shield4life
12 years ago
If we had a good general manager in those year I think we could of pulled out a SB win in one of those years with Sherman as the head coach.
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
joym13
12 years ago

If we had a good general manager in those year I think we could of pulled out a SB win in one of those years with Sherman as the head coach.

Originally Posted by: shield4life 



I agree - Sherman was a decent coach, terrible GM
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (26m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (26m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (27m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (34m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (35m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (55m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.