wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago



If you use $35 to buy a $25 steak, you don't get to have that $10 shrimp cocktail,


Originally Posted by: Wade 



So what good is it to get the $10 shrimp when you are so full you can't eat it all anyway?

GB only has a few holes to fill. Trading down for extra picks will only mean more players that won't make the team that they will release into the wild.

I understand more picks means more chances to have someone stick. But if they do their homework (and Uncle Teddy certainly does) they don't need the extra chances.


UserPostedImage
play2win
12 years ago
Wade, I see where you are coming from, but I disagree about him not being suitable for the #28.

I think there are a few other considerations at play here. Perry is one of the fastest, strongest DEs of the entire class. His numbers in two years of play are equal to or better than Coples, Ingram, Upshaw, Mercilus, Irvin and Jones. He's also a Junior. That is some pretty big production for two seasons, coming out early, and indicates room to grow. I think he is well worth the selection, and I believe he fell as a result of unfamiliarity, being a PAC 12 player on the West coast, more than anything. They just don't get as much attention and media blow up in general, especially mired in a USC program under restrictions, even though they played possibly better competition that most of the other players mentioned.

4 of Coples 10 sacks last year came against James Madison and Duke.
4.5 of Irvin's 8 sacks came against Marshall, UConn, and Louisville
9 of Mercilus's 16 sacks came against Arkansas St., Western Michigan, Indiana, Northwestern, a reeling Penn St. and Minnehaha.

The other thing is finding the trading partner. Sounds like Ted took offers to move both up and down, and didn't like what he was being offered to make a trade. He was protecting our interests, and he knew he absolutely had to hit with this pick.

I do think the soft press/exposure led both to Perry's falling on the boards, and this rather benign media response in falling into GB's laps without much splash and fanfare. Nick Perry is a pretty damn good pass rusher - and a great bookend for Matthews, and I doubt highly we could have gotten him mid to low R2, which is where I'm guessing Ted was getting offers for his #28. We surely don't need what I'm guessing would be the R4 throw in on that, to miss out on what we need now, and what many project to be a sure NFL starter at OLB/DE. An R2+R4 doesn't add up to our R1 at 28, and neither do any of the R2+R3 combinations, except for the top 10-12, and maybe those teams just weren't offering... enough. Maybe they like Perry that much. Sounds like a good pick to me, with great value and upside.
DoddPower
12 years ago
I suppose I can understand Wade's opinion, but I'm glad Ted Thompson doesn't agree with him (Luis Castillo, anyone?). I think Perry is going to be a beast. I'm sticking by my "poor man's LaMarr Woodley" statement. It may take awhile to get there, but that's the case with most players in the draft. Of course it's yet to be seen how effective he will be, but I love the pick. As Porky mentioned, we needed more speed on defense. Not only does Perry add that, but he also adds strength and toughness.

Perry will be a great #2 pass rusher, which is exactly what we needed. Ted Thompson thinks that he fits what the Packers need, and he got him. That's most important to me, not getting a few more picks. More than likely, Ted did not feel the trade options would perfectly suit the criterion of BPA and need.

I expect a lot of activity in days 2 and even more so day 3. Ted has 12 total picks; he has a ton of flexibility to add MORE pass rushers while still having someone he thinks capable of being a solid #2 OLB. Sweet deal. I don't think for one second that Perry is solely being depended on to fix the pass rush. He'll have every opportunity, but he's going to have to earn it through what I imagine will be stiff competition with a few more rookies and hopefully improvement from players currently on the roster.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago
And it actually surprises Finley that people react to twitter postings?

I suppose that is one of the things that frustrates me about young people. They do something and then are shocked by the fallout to what they did.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

So what good is it to get the $10 shrimp when you are so full you can't eat it all anyway?

GB only has a few holes to fill. Trading down for extra picks will only mean more players that won't make the team that they will release into the wild.

I understand more picks means more chances to have someone stick. But if they do their homework (and Uncle Teddy certainly does) they don't need the extra chances.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



"Few" holes?

Needed:
1. starting OLB (ok, lets say everyone's right and that's filled now.)

AND:
2. starting DE (Hargrove may work here; but I'm not convinced he's a long term solution; and he is going to be 29 this year)
3. starting safety.
4. nickel back (essentially starting CB) -- Woodson ain't around a lot longer.
5. ILB starter improvement.
6. OT (at least quality backup)
7. C (Saturday ain't going to be around long either.

By my count, they need quite a few things. RB, WR, QB, TE, LB -- these positions only need tweaks re: depth, can be satisfied by late round picks. But DE, S, CB, ILB, OL -- these need more than tweaks.

Again, it's not just more picks. It's more picks in the top 125.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago

"Few" holes?

Needed:
1. starting OLB (ok, lets say everyone's right and that's filled now.)

AND:
2. starting DE (Hargrove may work here; but I'm not convinced he's a long term solution; and he is going to be 29 this year)
3. starting safety.
4. nickel back (essentially starting CB) -- Woodson ain't around a lot longer.
5. ILB starter improvement.
6. OT (at least quality backup)
7. C (Saturday ain't going to be around long either.

By my count, they need quite a few things. RB, WR, QB, TE, LB -- these positions only need tweaks re: depth, can be satisfied by late round picks. But DE, S, CB, ILB, OL -- these need more than tweaks.

Again, it's not just more picks. It's more picks in the top 125.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



with so many holes it is a wonder this team can compete for the division little alone winning 15 games last year. GB should have gotten the first pick of the draft.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
12 years ago
What a bunch of apologists for the man you all are.

I mean -- what's the point of being a fan if you can't be unreasonable regularly?

Besides, even the Vikings were 15-1 once. Big deal. If 15-1 were enough, the Vikings would be a real team instead of never-won-it-all losers.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

"Few" holes?

Needed:
1. starting OLB (ok, lets say everyone's right and that's filled now.)

AND:
2. starting DE (Hargrove may work here; but I'm not convinced he's a long term solution; and he is going to be 29 this year)
3. starting safety.
4. nickel back (essentially starting CB) -- Woodson ain't around a lot longer.
5. ILB starter improvement.
6. OT (at least quality backup)
7. C (Saturday ain't going to be around long either.

By my count, they need quite a few things. RB, WR, QB, TE, LB -- these positions only need tweaks re: depth, can be satisfied by late round picks. But DE, S, CB, ILB, OL -- these need more than tweaks.

Again, it's not just more picks. It's more picks in the top 125.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



1, done.
2, don't you think it's a little early to write off guys like Lawrence Guy, C.J. Wilson, Johnny Jones and Jarius Wynn? As you said, who knows about Hargrove.
3, don't you think it's a little early to write off guys like M.D. Jennings and Anthony Levine?
4, don't you think it's a little early to write off guys like Davon House and Brandian Ross?
5, why won't you give D.J. Smith some props? He did well during his time filling in for A.J. Hawk, even had an athletic INT.
6, Packers used 2 first round picks on Tackles in the last two drafts prior to this year. Why do you want to count them both out already? At worst, Marshall Newhouse can be a solid backup if not a starter.
7, this is the biggest need left that does not involve the pass rush for the defense.



I'm not saying the Packers have all the pieces on the roster. It's too soon to say we know already that they don't. Keep in mind these young players missed an off season which is very beneficial to them last season. That means players like Marshall Newhouse (who could be a fine backup Tackle) missed a lot of proper preparation.

UserPostedImage
DakotaT
12 years ago

What a bunch of apologists for the man you all are.

I mean -- what's the point of being a fan if you can't be unreasonable regularly?

Originally Posted by: Wade 



Because you sound like a bunch of women, even Gunny!
UserPostedImage
play2win
12 years ago

"Few" holes?

Needed:
1. starting OLB (ok, lets say everyone's right and that's filled now.)

AND:
2. starting DE (Hargrove may work here; but I'm not convinced he's a long term solution; and he is going to be 29 this year)
3. starting safety.
4. nickel back (essentially starting CB) -- Woodson ain't around a lot longer.
5. ILB starter improvement.
6. OT (at least quality backup)
7. C (Saturday ain't going to be around long either.

By my count, they need quite a few things. RB, WR, QB, TE, LB -- these positions only need tweaks re: depth, can be satisfied by late round picks. But DE, S, CB, ILB, OL -- these need more than tweaks.

Again, it's not just more picks. It's more picks in the top 125.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



Wade, how can we possibly need another WR and TE? Haven't you been reading my special "trade up" thread?

Are we going to go 8 wide, with Saturday and Sitton in to block? That will be one quick f'in release. Hey, come to think of it, it might work!

😛 🐴
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3m) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (2h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (3h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (4h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (4h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (6h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (17h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.