Nonstopdrivel
12 years ago

Posted at 05:11 PM ET, 01/11/2012
Video appears to show troops urinating on corpses 
By Craig Whitlock

The Marine Corps said Wednesday that it is investigating the origins of a video on the Internet that purports to show Marines in combat gear urinating on the corpses of three Taliban insurgents.

The brief video, which runs for less than a minute, began circulating on Web sites early Wednesday. It depicts four Marines laughing as they relieve themselves while standing over three prostrate bodies.

Warning: the video includes graphic images.

(See below. Inserting the video inside the quote breaks the page table.)

A caption asserts that the Marines are part of a scout sniper team with the 3rd Battalion, 2nd Marines, an infantry unit from Camp Lejeune, N.C. Members of the unit were deployed to Afghanistan last year but returned in September.

Capt. Kendra N. Hardesty, a Marine Corps spokesman, said officials would “fully investigate” the matter but so far have been unable to verify the video’s authenticity or if members of the battalion were involved.

“The actions portrayed are not consistent with our core values and are not indicative of the character of the Marines in our Corps,” she said in a statement.

There was no way to determine independently where the video was filmed or the identities of those involved.

The caption refers to the corpses as “dead Talibans,” but it was unclear if they were civilians or fighters killed after a battle. The bodies are dressed in Afghan-style clothing; the chest of one male corpse appears to be soaked in blood.

Digital videos and photography have become increasingly common on the battlefield and many of the amateur productions wind up on the Internet. On occasion, the trend has caused severe embarrassment for the U.S. military, or in rare cases, such as the Abu Ghraib scandal in Iraq, triggered international controversy and legal action against those involved.

The Pentagon has sent mixed messages on social media, reviewing troops’ blogs for inappropriate content and classified information at the same time as it has encouraged units and commanders to communicate through Facebook. In embracing social media the Pentagon has effectively acknowledged that it simply cannot stop the flood of data and images from the battlefield.

In 2010, members from the 5th Stryker Combat Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division photographed themselves posing with corpses of Afghan civilians who were gunned down by a self-proclaimed “kill team” of rogue soldiers. In that case, however, the Army confiscated hundreds of photographs and successfully kept them out of the public domain for months.

A few were later obtained and published last March by two news magazines -- Rolling Stone and Der Spiegel, a German publication -- but the impact was muted. Unlike the purported video of the Marines, those photos did not depict troops in the act of desecrating corpses.

Craig Whitlock wrote:



Witness America's best and brightest, yo.

It infuriates me no end that I spent two years of my life in that shithole, working 12-, 16-, 20-hour days -- sometimes even going for days on end without a wink of sleep -- trying to repair the damage cretins like these wrought -- while these assholes go and fuck everything up, further stoking hatred and guaranteeing more Americans will get killed.

There are no words to describe how vile I consider these sacks of shit. Why didn't they just throw down a Qu'ran and piss on that too? I hold cocksuckers like this responsible for every unnecessary American life lost due to violating every cultural value these people hold dear.

My guess: This gets buried as fast as possible and no one has to take the consequences.

I'm going to bed. I need to cool off before I do something stupid.





UserPostedImage
Porforis
12 years ago

a

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



b
Nonstopdrivel
12 years ago
c (above)
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago
I like how TMZ censored their ding dings but not the dead bodies. Great values there TMZ.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Packers_Finland
12 years ago
Can't say I'm surprised anything invading soldiers do since seeing the Collateral Damage vid.
This is a placeholder
dfosterf
12 years ago
We did ears, usually. Go to war and then we'll talk about it, REMF.HELLO-- These are kill or be killed people. What the FUCK do you people think goes on there?

Desecration of the dead is practically a U.S. Marine "calling card". We like to let 'em know the party is over, this ain't the Army they are dealing with.

If absolutely left to our own devices without civillian intervention, I give you even odds you'd be reading some stories about Marine grunts cooking and eating the dead. We roll different than you, we play to win.

I wish I was there so I could piss on them too.

Judas H. Priest... You must now be a politically correct infantryman.

On Iwo Jima, for example, a Marine infantryman would definitely execute his prisoner rather than risk attempting to take him 100 yards to the rear. Shoot him right in the head.

Historical fact. Called the drop kick. Drop him, then kick his unfortunate ass to the side of the trail.

Pissing on dead ones IS practically politically correct, there. These boys were not in the rear with the gear. They "run with the animals". It ain't pretty. Abu Grabass my ass. Those were doggie punks. Just about "your" world, with vet benefits. These are REAL warriors... Charges and assignment of morals you complete non-been-there fucks place upon them be damned.

Don't like it? I suggest you go to Afghanistan and fix it for us. I'll wait for your report on how you accomplished this.
Zero2Cool
12 years ago
When I see things like this, I can't say I'm surprised. But I do think instead of Grandpa the war vet telling us the stories, now we have YouTube telling the stories. It's one of several things that I think technology has ruined with this whole "instant, now" media stuff.

I'd rather hear about this from war vets, than seeing videos of it.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
12 years ago
Except that war vets lie their asses off. War vets tell bald-faced lies without even blinking. I used to be astounded by the sheer boldness of the preposterous lies the guys I deployed with would tell other soldiers and civilians after we got back. I'm not talking about the sometimes unavoidable exaggerations that happen when guys get excited. I'm talking about lies about kills that never happened, injuries that were utter fabrications, slanderous accusations about our enemies that had no basis in fact.

I was talking to an army buddy the other day and he agreed with me: If a war vet's story is amazing, it's probably a lie.

No matter how sincere he looks, if a grizzled vet is holding you spellbound with tales of his adventures in "the shit," take his words with a huge grain of salt.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

Except that war vets lie their asses off. War vets tell bald-faced lies without even blinking. I used to be astounded by the sheer boldness of the preposterous lies the guys I deployed with would tell other soldiers and civilians after we got back. I'm talking about lies about kills that never happened, injuries that were utter fabrications, slanderous accusations about our enemies that had no basis in fact.

I was talking to an army buddy the other day and he agreed with me: If a war vet's story is amazing, it's probably a lie.

No matter how sincere he looks, if a grizzled vet is holding you spellbound with tales of his adventures in "the shit," take his words with a huge grain of salt.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 


Exactly why they are better and exactly why I'd prefer them over YouTube.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
12 years ago
I prefer knowing the truth.

I don't a storyteller when he admits he's spinning tales and isn't trying to impress me with his supposed heroism.

I really love those old guys who wear the Vietnam War Vet baseball hats but when you ask them where they served, they admit they never even left the States. Talk about resting on other guys' laurels.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (2h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (9h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (10h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (17h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.