DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

North Dakota has its own central bank, iirc. (Not privately owned, but owned and controlled by the state.) Hence they are in much better financial shape than other states.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 




We also have a $1.3 billion surplus in our budget. We call it a legacy fund. There's a referedum coming this spring to eliminate property tax, which would directly put $4.5K in my dumbass' pocket. Maybe I could afford to go shopping in Minnesota and pay their sales tax. Uncle Jed Clampett came up shooting for some food, and up through the ground come a bubbling crude - oil that is - black gold.

Minnesota - corn fields in the south, pine trees in the north. The only they have worthy of puffing their chests over is beautiful lakes offset by bat sized mosquitos. I'll visit, never live there.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago

NoDak still sucks. They are the reason Minnesota hasn't fallen into Lake Superior or drifted down stream of the Mighty Mississip.

As awesome as the Packers offense has become, their defense has regressed, dramatically. I know it's mostly because of said offense that they can afford to play a more ball-hawking/aggressive defense, but they are one concussion or broken finger away from unraveling at the seams. I know you guys have a talented young backup, but there will be no way he can keep up with Aaron's numbers. And that will affect how the defense will approach the game, big time.

Regardless, enjoy your time 'at the top', Puker fans. You're time to be in the pits will come. Then we can argue over who has the worst team in the NFC North, Vikes or Pukes.

Originally Posted by: Formo 



Dang. I'm going to go off topic in an off topic thread by going back to the original topic. Of all the ironies.

Has the D really regressed? Look at the last 3 games. You guys couldn't score double digit points. The Lions only scored 2 TDs and one was in garbage time. Was the Bucs game a blip? I'm hoping so. What really matters to me is that we managed to shut down Megatron. I'm betting Megatron gets the All Pro nod this year. He's been tremendous and we took him pretty much out of the game.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. šŸ‡¹šŸ‡¹ šŸ‡²šŸ‡² šŸ‡¦šŸ‡·
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
Wow, so we have a thread about the defense and a thread about North Dakota and we ... wow. Why do I even try.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Wow, so we have a thread about the defense and a thread about North Dakota and we ... wow. Why do I even try.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




If we talked about all the US missiles in North Dakota we could technically call it national defense and make the link.

BTW - it wasn't me THIS time.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
lol
UserPostedImage
MontanaBob
13 years ago
Right on DakotaT. You can put Montana into several of those categories you mentioned with North Dakota...big budget surplus...no sales tax...missile silos everywhere...black gold in the form of coal (more than anywhere else in the planet), plus millions of acres for guys and gals to hide out if they skip out of state like Minnesota for tax evasion or being a Vikings fan.

As for the Packers defense...hey, they're 11-0. Look at the teams at the top of the defensive categories...say the top ten. Whadda ya know! They've all lost a game or two or three or more. Collins going down hurt, but a win is a win. Statistics are for losers. The scoreboard when the time reads 0.00 is what counts. Oh gee, the packers have been on the good side of the scoreboard 11 times this season....17 in row dating back to last season.
Anyone for a Weenie Roast?
Formo
13 years ago

Dang. I'm going to go off topic in an off topic thread by going back to the original topic. Of all the ironies.

Has the D really regressed? Look at the last 3 games. You guys couldn't score double digit points. The Lions only scored 2 TDs and one was in garbage time. Was the Bucs game a blip? I'm hoping so. What really matters to me is that we managed to shut down Megatron. I'm betting Megatron gets the All Pro nod this year. He's been tremendous and we took him pretty much out of the game.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



I meant regressed compared to last year. I haven't broken down your defensive stats throughout this year, so they could have taken some steps forward.

But like I said, your defense benefits from a stellar offense. (And stopping the Vikings offense isn't a feat of strength).
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

I meant regressed compared to last year. I haven't broken down your defensive stats throughout this year, so they could have taken some steps forward.

But like I said, your defense benefits from a stellar offense. (And stopping the Vikings offense isn't a feat of strength).

Originally Posted by: Formo 


The Packers stellar offense gives the Packers defense poor statistics because weak teams are playing catch up and getting massive garbage time yards.
UserPostedImage
vikesrule
13 years ago

Right on DakotaT. You can put Montana into several of those categories you mentioned with North Dakota...big budget surplus...no sales tax...

Originally Posted by: MontanaBob 


Why does you agreeing with that numb-nuts DakotaT, not surprise me Bob?
Perhaps, because Montana is as big a deadbeat state as North Dakota.

Some American states receive more in federal spending than they pay in federal taxes; others receive less.
Over twenty years these fiscal transfers can add up to a sizable sum.

From 1990 to 2009, the federal government spent $125.2 billion in Montana but collected less than $60.8
billion in taxes.


From 1990 to 2009, the federal government spent $102.6 billion in North Dakota but collected less than
$53.9 billion in taxes.


Now that we have looked the leeches, let's take a look at a couple of states that actually keep the country afloat.


From 1990 to 2009, the federal government collected $1,016 billion in Minnesota but spent less than $503
billion in taxes.

From 1990 to 2009, the federal government collected $630.1 billion in Wisconsin but spent less than $543
billion in taxes.



And while we are at it, let's take a looky at GDP, shall we...from 2009
Minnesota - $258.5 billion
Wisconsin - $239.6 billion

Montana- $35.0 billion
North Dakota- $31.6 billion


Federal Taxes minus spending, 1990-2009, as a % of GDP
Minnesota - plus 199%
Wisconsin - plus 36%
Montana - minus 184%
North Dakota - minus 154%


While Montana and North Dakota folks are constantly screaming about government spending, when you ā€œpeel the
onionā€ and look at what states get the most Federal money, those are two of the big ones who have their hands out.

While both you and DT brag about your great surpluses, you two are like the guy that wins the lottery and still collects food stamps.
Yep, not only do Montana and North Dakota contribute less in both GDP and Taxes, they are still some of the
biggest hogs at the trough....i.e mooches, free-loaders and deadbeats.

So, in closing boys, after all of these decades of supporting your sorry asses - what say you pony up and
pay back the rest of the country for your years and years of beggar like existence.


Don't make me send the squirrels back after you Bob.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

Why does you agreeing with that numb-nuts DakotaT, not surprise me Bob?
Perhaps, because Montana is as big a deadbeat state as North Dakota.

Some American states receive more in federal spending than they pay in federal taxes; others receive less.
Over twenty years these fiscal transfers can add up to a sizable sum.

From 1990 to 2009, the federal government spent $125.2 billion in Montana but collected less than $60.8
billion in taxes.


From 1990 to 2009, the federal government spent $102.6 billion in North Dakota but collected less than
$53.9 billion in taxes.


Now that we have looked the leeches, let's take a look at a couple of states that actually keep the country afloat.


From 1990 to 2009, the federal government collected $1,016 billion in Minnesota but spent less than $503
billion in taxes.

From 1990 to 2009, the federal government collected $630.1 billion in Wisconsin but spent less than $543
billion in taxes.



And while we are at it, let's take a looky at GDP, shall we...from 2009
Minnesota - $258.5 billion
Wisconsin - $239.6 billion

Montana- $35.0 billion
North Dakota- $31.6 billion


Federal Taxes minus spending, 1990-2009, as a % of GDP
Minnesota - plus 199%
Wisconsin - plus 36%
Montana - minus 184%
North Dakota - minus 154%


While Montana and North Dakota folks are constantly screaming about government spending, when you ā€œpeel the
onionā€ and look at what states get the most Federal money, those are two of the big ones who have their hands out.

While both you and DT brag about your great surpluses, you two are like the guy that wins the lottery and still collects food stamps.
Yep, not only do Montana and North Dakota contribute less in both GDP and Taxes, they are still some of the
biggest hogs at the trough....i.e mooches, free-loaders and deadbeats.

So, in closing boys, after all of these decades of supporting your sorry asses - what say you pony up and
pay back the rest of the country for your years and years of beggar like existence.


Don't make me send the squirrels back after you Bob.

Originally Posted by: vikesrule 



Which is worse? Sucking at the government tit for hundreds of billions of dollars per year? Or feeding the obese bastard with hundreds of billions of dollars per year?

Both are true pornography.

It's like arguing about whether the pedarast Catholic priest is better or worse than the pedarast Lutheran minister.

Bleh.

(And, no, I'm not arguing that Iowa is superior. We're at least as pornographic as the rest of you.)
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (9h) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (9h) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (15h) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (15h) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (16h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (16h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (16h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (16h) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (16h) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (17h) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Rodgers passes for 3rd TD. might be last game of an amazing career
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : "The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry."
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : Owner ... love it
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : Mayo was the guy they groomed for HC and one of the reasons they let Bill go.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Pats have the #4 pick, lots of cap space and Maye at QB; should fetch some attention
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Well that didn't take long; Jerod Mayo out as Patriots HC
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : I would expect it to be higher in favor of Eagles
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Thst line seems...generous
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : Eagles -3.5 over Packers in Wildcard Round
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Did it though? Pokes beat the Commanders on the road with Cooper Rush previously
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : That gives them their best chance
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Cowboys starting Trey Lance at QB vs Commanders; GB vs Philly in the Wild Card incoming!
Mucky Tundra (4-Jan) : Stinks for Lloyd. Hoping he comes back strong for next year
Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Packers placed Marshawn Lloyd on reserve non-football illness list
Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Luke Getsy been helping Packers defense. He's former OC Bears/Raiders and our old QB coach
beast (2-Jan) : Thanks dfosterf, I'm still kicking myself for last week, as I forgot to change to pick Vikings and Lions... after putting in a holding spot.
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : First alternate: Elgton Jenkins Other alternates: Jordan Love, Kenny Clark, Keisean Nixon, Tucker Kraft, Josh Myers, Jaire Alexander
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Pro Bowl still a thing? Guess Packers have three. Jacobs, Gary, McKinney.
dfosterf (2-Jan) : It's a mine field with all the players sitting, etc
dfosterf (2-Jan) : There was quite a bit of "chalk" matchups this year it seemed, but not this week coming up
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
7h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

18h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Jan / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.