DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

North Dakota has its own central bank, iirc. (Not privately owned, but owned and controlled by the state.) Hence they are in much better financial shape than other states.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 




We also have a $1.3 billion surplus in our budget. We call it a legacy fund. There's a referedum coming this spring to eliminate property tax, which would directly put $4.5K in my dumbass' pocket. Maybe I could afford to go shopping in Minnesota and pay their sales tax. Uncle Jed Clampett came up shooting for some food, and up through the ground come a bubbling crude - oil that is - black gold.

Minnesota - corn fields in the south, pine trees in the north. The only they have worthy of puffing their chests over is beautiful lakes offset by bat sized mosquitos. I'll visit, never live there.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago

NoDak still sucks. They are the reason Minnesota hasn't fallen into Lake Superior or drifted down stream of the Mighty Mississip.

As awesome as the Packers offense has become, their defense has regressed, dramatically. I know it's mostly because of said offense that they can afford to play a more ball-hawking/aggressive defense, but they are one concussion or broken finger away from unraveling at the seams. I know you guys have a talented young backup, but there will be no way he can keep up with Aaron's numbers. And that will affect how the defense will approach the game, big time.

Regardless, enjoy your time 'at the top', Puker fans. You're time to be in the pits will come. Then we can argue over who has the worst team in the NFC North, Vikes or Pukes.

Originally Posted by: Formo 



Dang. I'm going to go off topic in an off topic thread by going back to the original topic. Of all the ironies.

Has the D really regressed? Look at the last 3 games. You guys couldn't score double digit points. The Lions only scored 2 TDs and one was in garbage time. Was the Bucs game a blip? I'm hoping so. What really matters to me is that we managed to shut down Megatron. I'm betting Megatron gets the All Pro nod this year. He's been tremendous and we took him pretty much out of the game.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. šŸ‡¹šŸ‡¹ šŸ‡²šŸ‡² šŸ‡¦šŸ‡·
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
Wow, so we have a thread about the defense and a thread about North Dakota and we ... wow. Why do I even try.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Wow, so we have a thread about the defense and a thread about North Dakota and we ... wow. Why do I even try.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




If we talked about all the US missiles in North Dakota we could technically call it national defense and make the link.

BTW - it wasn't me THIS time.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
lol
UserPostedImage
MontanaBob
13 years ago
Right on DakotaT. You can put Montana into several of those categories you mentioned with North Dakota...big budget surplus...no sales tax...missile silos everywhere...black gold in the form of coal (more than anywhere else in the planet), plus millions of acres for guys and gals to hide out if they skip out of state like Minnesota for tax evasion or being a Vikings fan.

As for the Packers defense...hey, they're 11-0. Look at the teams at the top of the defensive categories...say the top ten. Whadda ya know! They've all lost a game or two or three or more. Collins going down hurt, but a win is a win. Statistics are for losers. The scoreboard when the time reads 0.00 is what counts. Oh gee, the packers have been on the good side of the scoreboard 11 times this season....17 in row dating back to last season.
Anyone for a Weenie Roast?
Formo
13 years ago

Dang. I'm going to go off topic in an off topic thread by going back to the original topic. Of all the ironies.

Has the D really regressed? Look at the last 3 games. You guys couldn't score double digit points. The Lions only scored 2 TDs and one was in garbage time. Was the Bucs game a blip? I'm hoping so. What really matters to me is that we managed to shut down Megatron. I'm betting Megatron gets the All Pro nod this year. He's been tremendous and we took him pretty much out of the game.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



I meant regressed compared to last year. I haven't broken down your defensive stats throughout this year, so they could have taken some steps forward.

But like I said, your defense benefits from a stellar offense. (And stopping the Vikings offense isn't a feat of strength).
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

I meant regressed compared to last year. I haven't broken down your defensive stats throughout this year, so they could have taken some steps forward.

But like I said, your defense benefits from a stellar offense. (And stopping the Vikings offense isn't a feat of strength).

Originally Posted by: Formo 


The Packers stellar offense gives the Packers defense poor statistics because weak teams are playing catch up and getting massive garbage time yards.
UserPostedImage
vikesrule
13 years ago

Right on DakotaT. You can put Montana into several of those categories you mentioned with North Dakota...big budget surplus...no sales tax...

Originally Posted by: MontanaBob 


Why does you agreeing with that numb-nuts DakotaT, not surprise me Bob?
Perhaps, because Montana is as big a deadbeat state as North Dakota.

Some American states receive more in federal spending than they pay in federal taxes; others receive less.
Over twenty years these fiscal transfers can add up to a sizable sum.

From 1990 to 2009, the federal government spent $125.2 billion in Montana but collected less than $60.8
billion in taxes.


From 1990 to 2009, the federal government spent $102.6 billion in North Dakota but collected less than
$53.9 billion in taxes.


Now that we have looked the leeches, let's take a look at a couple of states that actually keep the country afloat.


From 1990 to 2009, the federal government collected $1,016 billion in Minnesota but spent less than $503
billion in taxes.

From 1990 to 2009, the federal government collected $630.1 billion in Wisconsin but spent less than $543
billion in taxes.



And while we are at it, let's take a looky at GDP, shall we...from 2009
Minnesota - $258.5 billion
Wisconsin - $239.6 billion

Montana- $35.0 billion
North Dakota- $31.6 billion


Federal Taxes minus spending, 1990-2009, as a % of GDP
Minnesota - plus 199%
Wisconsin - plus 36%
Montana - minus 184%
North Dakota - minus 154%


While Montana and North Dakota folks are constantly screaming about government spending, when you ā€œpeel the
onionā€ and look at what states get the most Federal money, those are two of the big ones who have their hands out.

While both you and DT brag about your great surpluses, you two are like the guy that wins the lottery and still collects food stamps.
Yep, not only do Montana and North Dakota contribute less in both GDP and Taxes, they are still some of the
biggest hogs at the trough....i.e mooches, free-loaders and deadbeats.

So, in closing boys, after all of these decades of supporting your sorry asses - what say you pony up and
pay back the rest of the country for your years and years of beggar like existence.


Don't make me send the squirrels back after you Bob.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

Why does you agreeing with that numb-nuts DakotaT, not surprise me Bob?
Perhaps, because Montana is as big a deadbeat state as North Dakota.

Some American states receive more in federal spending than they pay in federal taxes; others receive less.
Over twenty years these fiscal transfers can add up to a sizable sum.

From 1990 to 2009, the federal government spent $125.2 billion in Montana but collected less than $60.8
billion in taxes.


From 1990 to 2009, the federal government spent $102.6 billion in North Dakota but collected less than
$53.9 billion in taxes.


Now that we have looked the leeches, let's take a look at a couple of states that actually keep the country afloat.


From 1990 to 2009, the federal government collected $1,016 billion in Minnesota but spent less than $503
billion in taxes.

From 1990 to 2009, the federal government collected $630.1 billion in Wisconsin but spent less than $543
billion in taxes.



And while we are at it, let's take a looky at GDP, shall we...from 2009
Minnesota - $258.5 billion
Wisconsin - $239.6 billion

Montana- $35.0 billion
North Dakota- $31.6 billion


Federal Taxes minus spending, 1990-2009, as a % of GDP
Minnesota - plus 199%
Wisconsin - plus 36%
Montana - minus 184%
North Dakota - minus 154%


While Montana and North Dakota folks are constantly screaming about government spending, when you ā€œpeel the
onionā€ and look at what states get the most Federal money, those are two of the big ones who have their hands out.

While both you and DT brag about your great surpluses, you two are like the guy that wins the lottery and still collects food stamps.
Yep, not only do Montana and North Dakota contribute less in both GDP and Taxes, they are still some of the
biggest hogs at the trough....i.e mooches, free-loaders and deadbeats.

So, in closing boys, after all of these decades of supporting your sorry asses - what say you pony up and
pay back the rest of the country for your years and years of beggar like existence.


Don't make me send the squirrels back after you Bob.

Originally Posted by: vikesrule 



Which is worse? Sucking at the government tit for hundreds of billions of dollars per year? Or feeding the obese bastard with hundreds of billions of dollars per year?

Both are true pornography.

It's like arguing about whether the pedarast Catholic priest is better or worse than the pedarast Lutheran minister.

Bleh.

(And, no, I'm not arguing that Iowa is superior. We're at least as pornographic as the rest of you.)
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt ā€œice coldā€
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm šŸ¤” re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.