I laughed when the Vikings signed McNabb.

I'm still laughing.

:-"

---

By that opinion, the Packers shouldn't have put in Aaron until they shored up his propensity to hold on to the ball too long. You forget that he used to tally up getting sacked like crazy.

That said, throwing Ponder to the wolves now is just fine. First off, starting your first NFL game against your team's number 1 rival who also just happens to be the class of the NFL will be a great welcome to the NFL. Your team buries him a few times and lights a fire under his ass to get better as a QB or shows the coaches what they have to work with (not that they'd be able to do much.. I'm leaning towards the main problems with the Vikings is coaching as well as the line play). Or, start Ponder vs. the Packers and he somehow lights it up.

Either way, we'll never know if he's made of china if he doesn't play until the OL is fixed (which outside of a complete OL rehaul won't happen any earlier than 2 or 3 years). Knock him around a bit and see what you got.

---

Annnnnd the Ponder era starts  this Sunday vs. the Packers. And I'm ok with this on so many levels.

---

No one "forgot". The WR had long routes and the offensive line was poor ... in addition to Aaron holding the ball too long.

---

too

I know how bright you are, so STFU. It's the laziness or something. Two good-lookin' girls, I like to look at them, me too.

The two, to and too thing, coupled with the corps thing, are my only "Nonstopdrivel-type" bitches. Get 'em straight, I'll stop being a spelling kraut. [palm]

Completely wrong. There are plenty that has forgotten this. But that wasn't my point.



Fair enough, I agree. You had great coaching adjustments with Aaron and that offense (shortened up the time Rodgers held on to the ball by creating faster reads, 3 instead of 5+ step drops, etc).

I not only hate the fact that you guys have a great QB, I hate the fact that you guys have a solid OC/QB coaching group too.

---