Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
Several years ago, Gregg Easterbrook pointed out that the record of the average pundit in picking NFL winners on a weekly basis is little better than chance; a simple glance at the year-to-date records of the pundits on any major television or radio network show (say, Fox Sports) will reveal that some of the pundits will be at or even below .500 on their picks for the season. In the effort to be clever, or ride the current trendy bandwagon, or just listen to their gut, many pundits are flat-out wrong more often than not. In fact, Easterbrook pointed out, in a recent year (I think it was 2009), the following simple algorithm posted a better predictive record than all but one published pundit:

Season Record Algorithm

Pick team with better season record.
(if a tie) Pick home team.

"Gregg Easterbrook" wrote:



Sounds absurdly simple, but it works surprisingly well. The algorithm tends not to be extremely effective for the first two weeks of the season, but it did go 10-6 in both Weeks 1 and 2 for a combined record of 20-12 (.625), which isn't bad. (By way of comparison, Peter King is 26-6 or .781 over that same span.) It will be interesting to see how effective the algorithm is as the season progresses.

However, I think there are algorithms that could predict weekly winners with even more accuracy, so I have devised a couple that I believe will be effective. These algorithms will test the trope that "Offense wins games, but defense wins championships." I am intrigued by the fact that teams with the better defensive passer rating have been overwhelmingly successful at winning championships over the past for decades. Last year alone, the team with the better defensive passer rating went 10-1 in the playoffs. Likewise, it seems as though the teams with offensive juggernauts are the ones who tend to dominate in the regular season; think Kurt Warner, Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Brett Favre. On the other hand, these teams don't always have the best records in the playoffs. Therefore, I predict that the offensive passer rating algorithm will have better predictive success in the regular season, while the defensive passer rating algorithm will be more effective in the playoffs. It will be interesting to see how it pans out.

Here are the two passer rating algorithms:

Offensive Passer Rating Algorithm

Pick team with better offensive passer rating.
(if a tie) Pick home team.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Defensive Passer Rating Algorithm

Pick team with better offensive passer rating.
(if a tie) Pick home team.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



And here is an algorithm I personally think would have the highest success of all:

Hybrid Passer Rating Algorithm

Pick team with better offensive passer rating.
(if a tie) Pick team with better defensive passer rating.
(if a tie) Pick home team.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Feel free to contribute and track your own algorithms in this thread. I would love to compare the efficacy of a variety of predictive strategies. I would especially appreciate it if members would volunteer to track an algorithm so I wouldn't have to do all the work myself.
UserPostedImage
Formo
13 years ago
You are such an effing geek.

And this is coming from a guy who's last Facebook status was, "Its super embarassing when my wifey catches me pretending to be HeMan. I was raising my invisible sword and whispering, "By the power of GraySkull" and she caught me. :/ 
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago
Easterbrook is showing off his econ background. It's a basic technique of prediction that economists, particularly those inclined to telling macro stories, love: use an average of past performance to predict future performance.

Query: Which, if any, of the following yield the same predictions as Easterbrook's algorithm?

1. Let Xi = 1 if a win in week i, 0 if a loss, i=1,...,n where Xn is the last game. Then Y (prediction for week n + 1) = "Win" if (∑Xi )/i> 1, "Lose" if (∑Xi)/i < 1. If ∑Xi/i = 1, pick home team.
2. Let Xi = 1 if a win in week i, 0 if a loss, i=1,...,n where Xn is the last game. If ∑Xi (team A) >∑Xi(team 😎, predict team A to win in week n+1. If ∑Xi(team A) =∑Xi(team 😎, pick home team.
3. Let X = wins through n games for team A, Y = wins through n games for team B. If X > Y, pick team A. If X
Signed,
Geezer (but senile) geek.


Edit: See, this is why the goddam "slapnuts" macro or whatever it is has to go.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
macbob
13 years ago

Easterbrook is showing off his econ background. It's a basic technique of prediction that economists, particularly those inclined to telling macro stories, love: use an average of past performance to predict future performance.

Query: Which, if any, of the following yield the same predictions as Easterbrook's algorithm?

1. Let Xi = 1 if a win in week i, 0 if a loss, i=1,...,n where Xn is the last game. Then Y (prediction for week n + 1) = "Win" if (∑Xi )/i> 1, "Lose" if (∑Xi)/i < 1. If ∑Xi/i = 1, pick home team.
2. Let Xi = 1 if a win in week i, 0 if a loss, i=1,...,n where Xn is the last game. If ∑Xi (team A) >∑Xi(team 😎, predict team A to win in week n + 1. If ∑Xi(team A) =∑Xi(team 😎, pick home team.
3. Let X = wins through n games for team A, Y = wins through n games for team B. If X > Y, pick team A. If X
Signed,
Geezer (but senile) geek.


Edit: See, this is why the goddam "slapnuts" macro or whatever it is has to go.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



Wade-it's possible to get around the macro. Check out the quote.

Looks like 2 & 3 would render the same results. Don't think 1 would as written, as it doesn't make any comoparison between the two teams.
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

It's a basic technique of prediction that economists, particularly those inclined to telling macro stories, love: use an average of past performance to predict future performance.

Originally Posted by: Wade 


Well, yes. The downside to this technique is that it is vulnerable to unexpected short-term fluctuations. It cannot compensate if, for example, Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers were to go down for a game; it would predict the outcome of the game as though they were still in the game. The upside to the technique is that it is immune to the hot-hand fallacy so prevalent among sports commentators. For example, Tom Brady threw for 511 yards last week, leading a gushing Peter King to proclaim that he could walk right into the Hall of Fame now if he wanted, and no doubt leading other sports commentators to overestimate what he will do this week. Given that Tom Brady is only the sixth NFL quarterback in league history to throw for 400 yards in two consecutive games (the fifth, incidentally, was Cam Newton, so I have to think that last week marked the first time two quarterbacks had ever accomplished that feat on the same day), Tom Brady is much more likely to revert back to a number more closely approximating his career average of 246 yards per game than duplicate his career-best performance. This predictive technique refuses to be overawed by Brady's historic feat and stubbornly predicts that his performance from week to week will probably be typical instead of anomalous. It may therefore be inaccurate in the short term, but just as level-headed poker players usually take pokers chasing the hot hand to the cleaners, it will probably kick the asses of the bandwagon-chasing sports commentators over the long haul. (I remember being shocked to watch pregame shows last year and see that some TV commentators were sporting prediction records as low as 6-10 and 7-9; they would have been better off pulling names out of a hat or asking a chimpanzee's advice.)

That being said, here are the predictions for this week.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Edit: See, this is why the goddam "slapnuts" macro or whatever it is has to go.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



No sir, I do not see why the "goddamn" slapnuts must go.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
Season Record Algorithm (20-12)

JAC (1-1) @ CAR (0-2): Jacksonville
DET (2-0) @ MIN (0-2): Detroit
 SF (1-1) @ CIN (1-1): Cincinnati
MIA (0-2) @ CLE (1-1): Cleveland
 NE (2-0) @ BUF (2-0): Buffalo
NYG (1-1) @ PHI (1-1): Philadelphia
DEN (1-1) @ TEN (1-1): Tennessee
HOU (2-0) @  NO (1-1): Houston
NYJ (2-0) @ OAK (1-1): New York
 KC (0-2) @  SD (1-1): San Diego
BAL (1-1) @ STL (0-2): Baltimore
ATL (1-1) @  TB (1-1): Tampa Bay
 GB (2-0) @ CHI (1-1): Green Bay
ARI (1-1) @ SEA (0-2): Arizona
PIT (1-1) @ IND (0-2): Indianapolis
WAS (2-0) @ DAL (1-1): Washington

Offensive Passer Rating Algorithm

JAC  40.0  @  CAR  89.1: Carolina
DET 113.2  @  MIN  71.3: Detroit
 SF  95.2  @  CIN 104.1: Cincinnati
MIA  79.4  @  CLE  82.2: Cleveland
 NE 128.0  @  BUF 102.3: New England
NYG  80.5  @  PHI  93.3: Philadelphia
DEN  85.4  @  TEN  94.2: Tennessee
HOU 100.4  @   NO 114.9: New Orleans
NYJ  87.7  @  OAK  99.7: Oakland
 KC  49.5  @   SD  90.8: San Diego
BAL  82.8  @  STL  75.1: Baltimore
ATL  85.1  @   TB  82.7: Atlanta
 GB 126.4  @  CHI  84.1: Green Bay
ARI 110.3  @  SEA  80.1: Arizona
PIT  80.4  @  IND  71.4: Pittsburgh
WAS  90.6  @  DAL  99.9: Dallas

Defensive Passer Rating Algorithm

JAC  90.1  @  CAR 124.1: Jacksonville
DET  60.0  @  MIN  87.4: Detroit
 SF  89.0  @  CIN  85.9: Cincinnati
MIA 120.4  @  CLE  78.0: Cleveland
 NE  95.4  @  BUF  85.5: Buffalo
NYG  92.5  @  PHI  83.0: Philadelphia
DEN  99.8  @  TEN  68.5: Tennessee
HOU  69.5  @   NO  95.6: Houston
NYJ  56.2  @  OAK  80.3: New York
 KC 114.3  @   SD 111.3: San Diego
BAL  74.3  @  STL  87.3: Baltimore
ATL 105.1  @   TB 102.1: Tampa Bay
 GB  92.9  @  CHI  94.8: Green Bay
ARI  91.3  @  SEA 106.4: Arizona
PIT 100.0  @  IND  89.2: Indianapolis
WAS  81.3  @  DAL  92.4: Washington

Hybrid Passer Rating Algorithm

JAC  @  CAR: Carolina
DET  @  MIN: Detroit
 SF  @  CIN: Cincinnati
MIA  @  CLE: Cleveland
 NE  @  BUF: New England
NYG  @  PHI: Philadelphia
DEN  @  TEN: Tennessee
HOU  @   NO: New Orleans
NYJ  @  OAK: Oakland
 KC  @   SD: San Diego
BAL  @  STL: Baltimore
ATL  @   TB: Atlanta
 GB  @  CHI: Green Bay
ARI  @  SEA: Arizona
PIT  @  IND: Pittsburgh
WAS  @  DAL: Dallas

UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago
Well, I guess we're a lock then to beat da Bears. 🖐
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

No sir, I do not see why the "goddamn" slapnuts must go.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Fuker.

:)

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Zero2Cool (12h) : uh oh
Martha Careful (12h) : Too bad camera's can't spot the ball as well.
Mucky Tundra (14h) : So will the chain gang be gone completely or will they still be around as a backup or whatever?
Zero2Cool (14h) : The method for measuring first downs in the NFL will switch from chain gangs to camera-based technology in 2025, the league announced.
Martha Careful (17h) : A big step in the right direction. Just put in the college system is very very good.
Zero2Cool (20h) : NFL has passed a rule that allows both teams to possess the ball in OT during the regular season
Zero2Cool (20h) : Touchbacks on kickoffs will now bring the ball to the 35-yard line.
beast (31-Mar) : It might of gotten more popular recently, but braiding hair (even men) in certain cultures goes back for centuries.
Martha Careful (30-Mar) : Is men braiding their hair a new style thing? Watching the NCAA men's tournament many players have done
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Ha. Well, it'd be nice for folks to reset their own password. Via validated email 😏
beast (29-Mar) : Monopoly was supposed to be an educational game, that show how evil capitalism was and how we should avoid it
beast (29-Mar) : Lol, I was thinking username would be better, as then I wouldn't have to keep an email up to date lol 😂
beast (29-Mar) : Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (29-Mar) : sure is
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Monopoly is a rip off of The Landlord's Game
wpr (27-Mar) : 28 days until the draft
earthquake (27-Mar) : Which seemed strange to my 9 year old self, that you could be a fan for a team other than the one you play for
earthquake (27-Mar) : Nothing eventful happened, other than it being clear that he was a bengals fan
earthquake (27-Mar) : And we went and hung out with him one afternoon, I must have been 9 or so
earthquake (27-Mar) : That’s wild, when I was a kid my friend lived in the same apartment complex in De Pere
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : Only career highspot was a 200 yard rushing game while playing for the Cardinals
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : He is a former Packer. Drafted out of Northern Illinois. Didn't do much in GB.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Despicable
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Former NFL. I think Packers too
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : NFL RB Leshon Johnson has been charged in a massive dog fighting operation, with the FBI seizing over 190 Pit Bulls
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Some real irony of a QB as short as Wilson playing for the Giants
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Giants country, let's be the tall beings of lore!
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Russell Wilson signs with the Giants.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (25-Mar) : I don't think there is a significant difference. I use a user name for many. Others email.
Martha Careful (25-Mar) : email
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : would it be better to use EMAIL or USERNAME to log into a site?
wpr (25-Mar) : Thanks Zero
Zero2Cool (24-Mar) : New forum has the ability to Thank a post now.
beast (24-Mar) : And the only time they have won the Championship in an even year, was the first time they did, in 2006.
beast (24-Mar) : Since 2007, there have been 10 odd numbered years, Wisconsin Women have won the Championship in 7 of those 10 odd numbered years.
buckeyepackfan (24-Mar) : Congratulations Lady Badger Hockey Team. NATIONAL CHAMPIONS!!
Zero2Cool (23-Mar) : I don't think it's completed yet. it was just announced last month, right?
dhazer (23-Mar) : did netflix ever release the Packers documentary
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : And it is glorious!
beast (21-Mar) : Unsigned FA QB Rodgers is supposedly in the Steelers building
Martha Careful (19-Mar) : But I don't own a car! So can I still use it in my apartment?
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : btw, new site auto updates
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : Woohoo!
TheKanataThrilla (19-Mar) : Oops I guess I should have updated the site before posting
TheKanataThrilla (19-Mar) : Jeremy Fowler @JFowlerESPN · Follow Source: Free agent WR/return specialist Mecole Hardman is signing with the #Packers on a one-year deal.
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Former Packers wide receiver Bob Long, who stayed in Wisconsin after playing days, dies at age 83
Martha Careful (17-Mar) : PFOW, Pati O'Furniture
wpr (17-Mar) : Thanks dfosterf. Been a while since I heard the song.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / dfosterf

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

24-Mar / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

24-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

21-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.