earthquake
13 years ago

This is not last years defense by far, we can't pressure a qb to save our ass and they will be using Hawk or Bishop to spy Newton

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



3 sacks, multiple pressures. Brees was hit early, and often. Lack of pressure was NOT the reason the Saint's put up so many yards and points, it was poor tackling, poor coverage, and Brees being a freaking-elite QB.

Its a bit silly to say what this defense can and can't do after one week.
blank
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

This is not last years defense by far, we can't pressure a qb to save our ass and they will be using Hawk or Bishop to spy Newton

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



I'm not going to disagree with this statement, but I do feel we should wait until at least four games into the season before making such statement.
UserPostedImage
Yerko
13 years ago
Hoping that I can sit back and relax for the ENTIRE game this time. With that early 14-0 lead last week, I started to enjoy my dinner and then almost lost it...

Personally, I am tired of hearing about Cam Newton. Had to listen to it during the longest off-season ever and last weeks performance and nut-hugging by the media doesn't help at all [puke]. He might one day be a good quarterback for Carolina, but some crazy things happened in the first week of this season (the Bears won).

Cam Newton will meet his maker this week, peering up at the sky and seeing a predator-like figure flexing and screaming over him...at least twice, maybe 3 times if Otah isn't playing.

Rodgers and Co. will be too quick for this defense to hang with. Hoping Mike McCarthy keeps the foot down on the gas the entire game.

Packers by 14+
UserPostedImage
Silentio
13 years ago

Personally, I am tired of hearing about Cam Newton.

Originally Posted by: G-Force 



This. Every time I’ve turned on ESPN (or ESPN2) in the last four days it’s been Newton’s face plastered all over everything, and everyone swinging from his nut sack. That is, until they turn to this week’s matchup against the Packers.

some crazy things happened in the first week of this season (the Bears won).



Some crazy things did happen, but I’m not sure the Bears winning was one of them. I was all ready for the Bears to be terrible this year (6-10), but I’m not so sure. It will be interesting to see them go up against the Saints this week.
blank
evad04
13 years ago

This. Every time I’ve turned on ESPN (or ESPN2) in the last four days it’s been Newton’s face plastered all over everything, and everyone swinging from his nut sack. That is, until they turn to this week’s matchup against the Packers.



Some crazy things did happen, but I’m not sure the Bears winning was one of them. I was all ready for the Bears to be terrible this year (6-10), but I’m not so sure. It will be interesting to see them go up against the Saints this week.

Originally Posted by: Silentio 


With you on both accounts. I also think:

a) The Cam Newton circle jerk is at least in part due his week one performance greatly exceeding the bar he set (lowered) with his preseason play. It's the media's fault for manufacturing the wave, or at least being reactionary. Nothing new. But basically Newton looked rough through most of his preseason games, with occasional flashes of athletic prowess and potential. That makes the 400+ yard outing against Carolina seem better than it was (and it was pretty damn good). I still think he'll have a tough time with Green Bay's defense, and I expect us to beat'em. But I'll also wager that at least a few times we'll shake our head and think, "Damn, this kid has some special talent."

b) With regard to the Bears, I think they're a good team. The win against Atlanta was impressive and shows what they're capable of when everything goes their way (not that they didn't earn it). They have a tough defense, their special teams always makes plays, and we have to remember that Cutler has another year in an intricate offense. Their o-line still blows and Cutler will probably still make enough dumbshit throws to keep him from elite status -- though physically he has elite "talent". Jermichael can tear that D up, though, so let's hope he can stay healthy. Finally, and I heard this from a Bears fan: Chicago was extremely healthy last year. They didn't battle the injury bug (or in Green Bay's case, plague). I don't know how equipped they are to deal the loss of starters. That means they may have to get lucky again. We'll see.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Silentio
13 years ago

With you on both accounts. I also think:

a) The Cam Newton circle jerk is at least in part due his week one performance greatly exceeding the bar he set (lowered) with his preseason play. It's the media's fault for manufacturing the wave, or at least being reactionary. Nothing new. But basically Newton looked rough through most of his preseason games, with occasional flashes of athletic prowess and potential. That makes the 400+ yard outing against Carolina seem better than it was (and it was pretty damn good). I still think he'll have a tough time with Green Bay's defense, and I expect us to beat'em. But I'll also wager that at least a few times we'll shake our head and think, "Damn, this kid has some special talent."

b) With regard to the Bears, I think they're a good team. The win against Atlanta was impressive and shows what they're capable of when everything goes their way (not that they didn't earn it). They have a tough defense, their special teams always makes plays, and we have to remember that Cutler has another year in an intricate offense. Their o-line still blows and Cutler will probably still make enough dumbshit throws to keep him from elite status -- though physically he has elite "talent". Jermichael can tear that D up, though, so let's hope he can stay healthy. Finally, and I heard this from a Bears fan: Chicago was extremely healthy last year. They didn't battle the injury bug (or in Green Bay's case, plague). I don't know how equipped they are to deal the loss of starters. That means they may have to get lucky again. We'll see.

Originally Posted by: evad04 



a) I don’t think the media attention on Newton is totally unjustified. The guy did have an incredible showing. I kept thinking that it would slow down but he just kept rolling. Pretty amazing stuff. The attention as such, that is. The volume of attention is ridiculous. Brady had a fucking unbelievable showing even for Brady. Or maybe not. Do people expect Brady to throw a million yards? Well, he better keep it up because the Pats' secondary sucks.

b) The Bears are a talented team. But you’re right, they had a lot fall into their laps last season (and in the ATL game). The Bears need to have a horseshoe shoved up their ass before the season starts to do anything worth noting. Their luck always seems to run out, though, doesn’t it.
blank
evad04
13 years ago

a) I don’t think the media attention on Newton is totally unjustified. The guy did have an incredible showing. I kept thinking that it would slow down but he just kept rolling. Pretty amazing stuff. The attention as such, that is. The volume of attention is ridiculous. Brady had a fucking unbelievable showing even for Brady. Or maybe not. Do people expect Brady to throw a million yards? Well, he better keep it up because the Pats' secondary sucks.

b) The Bears are a talented team. But you’re right, they had a lot fall into their laps last season (and in the ATL game). The Bears need to have a horseshoe shoved up their ass before the season starts to do anything worth noting. Their luck always seems to run out, though, doesn’t it.

Originally Posted by: Silentio 


Yes, it does ... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

UserPostedImage

William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
zombieslayer
13 years ago

Hoping that I can sit back and relax for the ENTIRE game this time. With that early 14-0 lead last week, I started to enjoy my dinner and then almost lost it...

Personally, I am tired of hearing about Cam Newton. Had to listen to it during the longest off-season ever and last weeks performance and nut-hugging by the media doesn't help at all [puke]. He might one day be a good quarterback for Carolina, but some crazy things happened in the first week of this season (the Bears won).

Cam Newton will meet his maker this week, peering up at the sky and seeing a predator-like figure flexing and screaming over him...at least twice, maybe 3 times if Otah isn't playing.

Rodgers and Co. will be too quick for this defense to hang with. Hoping Mike McCarthy keeps the foot down on the gas the entire game.

Packers by 14+

Originally Posted by: G-Force 



I don't mind hearing about Cam Newton. After he throws 3 picks Sunday, you won't hear about him so much. I also think our D is going to get in his face early and often.

I said earlier 20+ points (well, Wade said it; I was just agreeing with Wade). I wanna bump that to 25+ points now.

We will score at will.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
dhazer
13 years ago

I don't mind hearing about Cam Newton. After he throws 3 picks Sunday, you won't hear about him so much. I also think our D is going to get in his face early and often.

I said earlier 20+ points (well, Wade said it; I was just agreeing with Wade). I wanna bump that to 25+ points now.

We will score at will.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Hell I'll take that bet if your willing, I see Green Bay winning but not by a blowout. Like I brought up when was the last time we blew someone out besides the freak show in Atlanta when everything went right for us. How soon we forget the games from last year against a shitty Washington and Miami teams. I hate to say it but I don't think this team is as good as last years team. I think the 2 big losses of Jenkins and believe this Colledge will hurt us this year.


I say Packers by 9

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Hell I'll take that bet if your willing, I see Green Bay winning but not by a blowout. Like I brought up when was the last time we blew someone out besides the freak show in Atlanta when everything went right for us. How soon we forget the games from last year against a shitty Washington and Miami teams. I hate to say it but I don't think this team is as good as last years team. I think the 2 big losses of Jenkins and believe this Colledge will hurt us this year.

I say Packers by 9

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



The loss of Daryn Colledge is going to hurt more than most fans realize, been saying it since the day he signed with the Cardinals. Chad Clifton benefited from Colledge quite a bit.

No one's forgotten the games between the Redskins and Dolphins last year. Those games were played early in the season before the Packers got hot.


The Packers by 9 prediction I don't think is far off.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (3h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (5h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (21h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.