I do not think any player should be admitted to the Hall Of Fame unless they have earned a RING.

If they did not earn a Ring, they were a waste of time, and not a player that made a difference in taking a team from good to great.

One exception. I do not think Brett should get in even though he has a ring. Just because, he has zero morals and social graces.

There has to be some serious qualification changes to get in "The Hall" I say remove every player who did not get a ring, and then it would really be a visit fans could make to see the best of the best.

:)

Originally Posted by: RaiderPride 

I do not think any player should be admitted to the Hall Of Fame unless they have earned a RING.

If they did not earn a Ring, they were a waste of time, and not a player that made a difference in taking a team from good to great.

One exception. I do not think Brett should get in even though he has a ring. Just because, he has zero morals and social graces.

There has to be some serious qualification changes to get in "The Hall" I say remove every player who did not get a ring, and then it would really be a visit fans could make to see the best of the best.

:)

Originally Posted by: RaiderPride 

Personally.. I believe a single player can perform transcendentally upon a team and said team may never taste the sweet savor of victory.

This is the ultimate team game.. you have to have a surrounding cast to obtain a championship.

Example.. Walter Payton carried the Bears for years.. but did not obtain his ring until he had a team around him capable of carrying their own weight.

A ring is a team thing.. and really should be judged as such.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z