Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
Ground trio looks rock solid 


When it comes to the proverbial "looks good coming off the bus" routine, the Green Bay Packers running backs will pass the eyeball test like no other.

It's doubtful any team in the National Football League has a trio of running backs with the height, weight and shredded physiques to compare with Ryan Grant, James Starks and rookie Alex Green.

Green Bay won the Super Bowl with smallish Brandon Jackson leading the position in snaps with 622 and squatty John Kuhn finishing second with 278. Starks, who didn't claim featured-back status from Jackson until the start of the playoffs, was third at 206.

The Packers lost Jackson to Cleveland on Thursday in unrestricted free agency, and Kuhn could be gone as well.

Both players maximized their ability. Their contributions were significant.

But it's a new day at the position, and the depth chart of general manager Ted Thompson appears fairly well-stocked.

Grant, 6 feet 1 inch and 224 pounds, returns from a season cut short in the first half of the first game by ankle damage.

Starks (6-2, 222) looks even more ripped than he did as a rookie.

And now they'll be joined by Green (6-0, 224), a third-round draft choice who will be given the chance to assume the third-down duties that had been shared by Jackson and Kuhn.

They give Green Bay not one, not two but three backs possessing the God-given dimensions to slam through the wind and wet of the punishing second half of an NFC North season.

Before the lockout even started, and Green was just a draft-eligible player from Hawaii, coach Mike McCarthy forecast a competition between Grant and Starks.

"Oh, yeah," McCarthy said. "But I'm not looking to run one guy into the ground."

Until Grant's injury, McCarthy had been a one-back guy. The percentage of running-back carries allocated to the featured back was 67.2% for Ahman Green in 2006, 55% for Grant in '07, 83.4% for Grant in '08 and 75.5% for Grant in '09.

McCarthy isn't averse to running the ball. Counting playoffs, his teams in five seasons have run 41.3%, which isn't far removed from the 42.8% for Mike Holmgren in seven seasons and the 42.5% for Mike Sherman in six.

Now Joe Philbin, McCarthy's offensive coordinator since '07, is aiming to make the running plays more efficient. In 20 games, the per-carry averages of Jackson (3.7), Starks (3.8), Kuhn (3.2) and Dimitri Nance (2.6) weren't pretty.

"This is an offense that is always going to utilize its strengths and its best players, but the running game is important," Philbin said. "We've got to do a better job of less 0, 1 and negative (carries). We had a 0 gain or minus 16% of the time. That's too much."

Without Grant, McCarthy lost the downhill dimension and began "to create his running game from the threat of the pass," according to one NFC personnel man. The Packers, Philbin said, were effective rushing using multiple wide receivers with Aaron Rodgers under center and in shotgun.

Take the Super Bowl. On the 11 times that Rodgers settled on a run at the line, Starks gained 52 yards (4.7).

"They weren't going to beat us in the run game; we knew that," Steelers linebackers coach Keith Butler said last month. "But you can't just throw it all the time. Schematically, they were very good at what they were doing. They did some things with motion to try to take advantage of some things. Their run game was very sound."

Assuming Grant returns to full health, which he stated he was in mid-December, the Packers might be able to pound defenses from the I formation on first down.

"He's the starter," said former Packers safety LeRoy Butler, an analyst for JSOnline. "If he's healthy, he can run the stretch-ride, where he picks his hole. He's very good at that. He's a very capable guy."

Five months shy of his 29th birthday, Grant is entering the final year of his contract. Given the short careers of most running backs, it's entirely possible this will be his final season in Green Bay.

"Hungry, competitive," Philbin replied when asked about Grant's anticipated mindset. "We'll probably have to slow him down instead of giving him the green light. That's the kind of guy he is."

In the past, at least, Grant has hit holes harder than Starks. That could change because a hamstring injury limited Starks to merely seven games as a rookie, and a shoulder injury KO'd him for his final collegiate season.

"I'm excited as hell for James Starks," McCarthy said at the combine. "I think he's got a chance to be a great player."

Starks didn't have a fumble or penalty. There were just eight passes thrown to him (no drops), and his hands certainly seem more dependable than Grant's. And his blitz pickup wasn't bad, either.

"I think he's the true future," LeRoy Butler said. "He's an upright runner but he has a very strong lower body. He never goes down."

It's best to wait another season for an evaluation of Starks. His legs were fresh down the stretch when everyone else's were tired.

"He is really strong," an NFC personnel man said. "He just can't make anybody miss. A guy like that is not going to last very long."

Green was billed by scouts as an even more accomplished collegiate receiver than Starks. His one-cut style of running seems a match for the sixth year of the Packers' zone scheme.

In the Warriors' "pistol" offense, Green benefited from huge holes and didn't have a lot of tight-quarters, NFL-type runs. His 4.52-second speed in the 40 is identical to Starks', and he has shown power and surprisingly good feet.

The Western Athletic Conference isn't the NFL, but Green's 2010 averages in rushing (8.2) and receiving (13.4) jumped off the page.

"If he can pick up blitzes, I think he'll be the prototypical third-down back," LeRoy Butler said. "He'll be a home-run hitter, and for the most part they don't have any home-run threat."

In a perfect world, the Packers wanted Jackson back. He was, by far, their best blocker.

Grant's return, a three-back power set and his own philosophy means McCarthy isn't ready to foreclose on the fullback position. Still, it's unlikely he'll keep three, as he has the past two seasons.

If Kuhn returns, his ability on third down and as a ball carrier would give him the edge. Then it would come down to Quinn Johnson, a hammer with indecision in his play, and Korey Hall, a top special-teams player who also could leave in free agency.

"They're all different," Philbin said, referring to the fullbacks. "Overall, they were OK."


UserPostedImage
nerdmann
13 years ago
Two responses to this.
1: Yes, MM's raw percentage of runs to pass is similar to Holmgren's. HOWEVER, what you have to take into consideration is that for Holmy, running screens and shuffle passes were considered part of the running game. Mike McCarthy hasn't had a guy who can run screens very well. Although he has two of them now. Yes I know, Bjack was ok at screens, but I just thought he didn't look natural on them. He was also a little bit slower than these younger guys.
2: Grant is not a "more accomplished" receiver than Starks.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nyrpack
13 years ago
i think there gonna go with a 2 headed monster approach, grant and then some starks, this will keep both healthy for a long season, it worked here in ny for the giants, i think we should go with the same approach !!
jimmy b.
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago

Two responses to this.
1: Yes, MM's raw percentage of runs to pass is similar to Holmgren's. HOWEVER, what you have to take into consideration is that for Holmy, running screens and shuffle passes were considered part of the running game. Mike McCarthy hasn't had a guy who can run screens very well. Although he has two of them now. Yes I know, Bjack was ok at screens, but I just thought he didn't look natural on them. He was also a little bit slower than these younger guys.
2: Grant is not a "more accomplished" receiver than Starks.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Grant has caught more passes in his NFL career than Starks has.

Grant had 78 receptions in 2.5 years.
Starks had 5 receptions in 7 games including playoffs.

More accomplished, sure. More talented, probably not.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Cowboys starting Trey Lance at QB vs Commanders; GB vs Philly in the Wild Card incoming!
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Stinks for Lloyd. Hoping he comes back strong for next year
Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Packers placed Marshawn Lloyd on reserve non-football illness list
Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Luke Getsy been helping Packers defense. He's former OC Bears/Raiders and our old QB coach
beast (2-Jan) : Thanks dfosterf, I'm still kicking myself for last week, as I forgot to change to pick Vikings and Lions... after putting in a holding spot.
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : First alternate: Elgton Jenkins Other alternates: Jordan Love, Kenny Clark, Keisean Nixon, Tucker Kraft, Josh Myers, Jaire Alexander
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Pro Bowl still a thing? Guess Packers have three. Jacobs, Gary, McKinney.
dfosterf (2-Jan) : It's a mine field with all the players sitting, etc
dfosterf (2-Jan) : There was quite a bit of "chalk" matchups this year it seemed, but not this week coming up
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Or we got better and by we I mean everyone except me
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : We have about six that by percent would have won nearly any season. I guess 2024 was predictable 🤷
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : You can check previous seasons. I quick did it and don't think anyone hit 70% before
dfosterf (2-Jan) : Hats off to the Beast
dfosterf (2-Jan) : I'm at 71.76% in pick 'em. 2nd place. Beast is at a flat 75% 9 games ahead. That 75% has got to be unprecedented this late in the season
beast (2-Jan) : I don't care deeply, just want some good entertaining games
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : BTW, not serious.
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : You don't care about it either!!!!
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : NIL and Portal killed college, no one cares about it.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jan) : outside of Texas-Arizona St, it's been a snoozefest
beast (2-Jan) : I expect Georgia will change that tomorrow, but we'll have to wait and see. If they do, then only Big 10 and SEC are left.
beast (2-Jan) : So much for Conference Championship meaning something as 100% (so far) of the conference Champions lost their first playoff game.
Zero2Cool (1-Jan) : Jaire had surgery, season over.
Mucky Tundra (1-Jan) : I guess I need a new sig Pic. Boo
Mucky Tundra (1-Jan) : Eric Dickerson approves of this decision
beast (1-Jan) : Eagles are resting RB Saquon Barkley, so there is no chance he breaks the record despite being just 101 yards from it
Zero2Cool (1-Jan) : Patriots are waiving veteran pass rusher Yannick Ngakoue
beast (1-Jan) : Happy New Year's 🥳🎉
beast (31-Dec) : I want to them chant some songs for Daniel Whelan
beast (31-Dec) : Let's win one! Also, hopefully the Irish will stand with Daniel Whelan
Mucky Tundra (31-Dec) : After London and Brazil, I could go without an overseas game for a while
Zero2Cool (31-Dec) : Packers. Steelers. Ireland. 2025. Reports say.
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Matt Lafleur on if Jaire will play again this season. "Yeah I don't know... he's been dealing with swelling."
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : After the way they played for most of the game yesterday, I don't see how you can sit anyone for the whole game
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : I'd say play everyone. Going into playoffs at 7th seed on two game lose streak - yucky
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Do the Packers have any best players?
beast (30-Dec) : Play or Rest*
beast (30-Dec) : Should the Packers play or free their best players vs the Bears?
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Packers should be 3 - 2 in the Division. Bonkers being swept by both Lions and Vikings. yikes
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : All crazy stuff…and good point beast
beast (30-Dec) : Packers should be 0-5 in the division, can't say I saw that coming, even 1-4
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Sam Darnold 35 TD's ... another one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Baker Mayfield, 39 TD's ... can't say I saw that one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : No matter who is playing as 7th, I think we want them to win. Get rid of 2nd seed haha
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : That would be dhazer who was rooting for Minnesota
beast (30-Dec) : Well, Commanders are currently the 6th seed and Packers the 7th
beast (30-Dec) : Who was it in Chat, that wanted the Vikings to win (because Lions fans upset them) because Packers could not lose the 6th seed?
beast (30-Dec) : If Falcons win, Packers stay as the 6th seed and Falcons lead the NFCS, if they lose, Commanders 6th and Bucs take NFCS lead
beast (30-Dec) : Win or Loss, the NFCS is going down to week 18
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : if the Falcons win, how does that affect the overall NFC playoff picture? Does it mean that the NFC South comes down to week 18?
beast (30-Dec) : If Commanders win, the Packers drop to the 7th seed
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Jan / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

2-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

31-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

31-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.