13 years ago

Uh, I don't know what kind of gay bars you frequent, but I have never seen nuts being slapped at a gay bar.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I'll take your word for that. Meanwhile, slapnuts is still kind of a a creepy term, IMO. If people in real life slapped you in the nuts when they agreed with you, I'd make sure to be even more argumentative than I am on this forum.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

I'll take your word for that. Meanwhile, slapnuts is still kind of a a creepy term, IMO. If people in real life slapped you in the nuts when they agreed with you, I'd make sure to be even more argumentative than I am on this forum.

Originally Posted by: get_louder_at_lambeau 




It is a twisted and sick idea that Zero came up with. I think he got tired of people saying "+ the numeral 1" instead of something else. He tied it to that. It seems to have taken on a life of it's own after that.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
I don't know why straights are so afraid of gay bars. They are a lot of fun. Unlike straight bars, where you have to be discreet and beat around the bush about what you want because you constantly have to worry about stepping on someone's toes, at gay bars you can be totally honest about what you want. Yeah, it means you will get an occasional guy hitting on you, but all you have to do is make it obvious you are straight and they leave you alone. On the other hand, though most men don't believe this, it is really easy to pick up a girl at a gay bar. Yes, women go to gay bars "not to be hit on," but women have this weird mental blind spot: Because they tell themselves they aren't in a gay bar to be hit on, they allow all sorts of advances they would never allow in a straight bar, end up getting horny, and often going home with a guy who is persistent at all. I know guys who frequent gay bars for just this reason. It is one of the easiest places in the world to get laid. The air is just so charged with sexual electricity.

That being said, I don't know why someone would brush off the gay guys anyway. Just as girls mooch off guys in regular bars by being teases, straight guys can do the same thing in gay bars. It is the easiest way I know of to get wasted, if that is what you are into.

I should add that with the exception of getting wasted, none of the aforementioned applies in Germany, where people of the opposite sex aren't allowed in Schwulenkneipen or Lesbenkneipen.

Back on topic, "slapnuts" was just an auto-censor Kevin set up because he was tired of people saying "+1" and nothing else. It is just like the way the old forum converted DD to "Donald Driver" and Mike McCarthy to "Mike McCarthy," sometimes to hilarious effect.
UserPostedImage
Yerko
13 years ago
Clay Matthews Highlight- Youtube 

Probably some of the best form tackles I have seen from a professional player in a while. His tackles not only have good form, but they are still hard hits. A lot of guys think you have to lower a shoulder to get that big time hit. Matthews proves that theory wrong with a lot of his tackles.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
13 years ago

I don't know why straights are so afraid of gay bars. They are a lot of fun. Unlike straight bars, where you have to be discreet and beat around the bush about what you want because you constantly have to worry about stepping on someone's toes, at gay bars you can be totally honest about what you want. Yeah, it means you will get an occasional guy hitting on you, but all you have to do is make it obvious you are straight and they leave you alone. On the other hand, though most men don't believe this, it is really easy to pick up a girl at a gay bar. Yes, women go to gay bars "not to be hit on," but women have this weird mental blind spot: Because they tell themselves they aren't in a gay bar to be hit on, they allow all sorts of advances they would never allow in a straight bar, end up getting horny, and often going home with a guy who is persistent at all. I know guys who frequent gay bars for just this reason. It is one of the easiest places in the world to get laid. The air is just so charged with sexual electricity.

That being said, I don't know why someone would brush off the gay guys anyway. Just as girls mooch off guys in regular bars by being teases, straight guys can do the same thing in gay bars. It is the easiest way I know of to get wasted, if that is what you are into.

I should add that with the exception of getting wasted, none of the aforementioned applies in Germany, where people of the opposite sex aren't allowed in Schwulenkneipen or Lesbenkneipen.

Back on topic, "slapnuts" was just an auto-censor Kevin set up because he was tired of people saying "Slapnuts" and nothing else. It is just like the way the old forum converted DD to "Donald Driver" and Mike McCarthy to "Mike McCarthy," sometimes to hilarious effect.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



When talking about "slapnuts" is getting back on topic in the Packers section, the thread might pretty much be doomed.
13 years ago
Why not "kick in the nuts"? Fuck slapnuts.
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

It is a twisted and sick idea that Zero came up with. I think he got tired of people saying "+ the numeral 1" instead of something else. He tied it to that. It seems to have taken on a life of it's own after that.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I got tired of the lack of creativity in responses when one agrees or likes someone's post. At least this sparks a bit of humor, for some. For me, it's downright hilarious. 🙂 This is a forum, its meant for discussing, not clicking Quote, slapping down two characters and hitting submit. That's weak and boring.




I've never really thought much about Clay's tackling, which is why I haven't paid much attention to this thread until now. I didn't know this (slapnuts) was even going on, lol. The more I think about it, I can't remember a time where Clay had his hands on a ballcarrier that got away.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

I got tired of the lack of creativity in responses when one agrees or likes someone's post. At least this sparks a bit of humor, for some. For me, it's downright hilarious. 🙂 This is a forum, its meant for discussing, not clicking Quote, slapping down two characters and hitting submit. That's weak and boring.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




As for me, I have just been harassing you just a bit.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (4h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (9h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (10h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (20h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (21h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
50m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Random Babble / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.