nerdmann
13 years ago
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/26903/packers-the-reed-elmore-debate 

In the weeks and days leading to the NFL draft, public discussion centered the Green Bay Packers' interest in an Arizona defensive end who projected as an outside linebacker in their 3-4 scheme. Brooks Reed was a 263-pound pass-rusher who displayed superior speed and initial acceleration at the scouting combine.

As it turns out, the Packers drafted an Arizona defensive end who projects as an outside linebacker. But it wasn't Reed, who went to the Houston Texans with the No. 42 overall pick. Instead, it was a player who more than doubled Reed's sack total for the Wildcats during the past two seasons. Ricky Elmore posted 21.5 sacks to Reed's 8.5 over that stretch, but Elmore was still available late in the sixth round (No. 197).

That production disparity jumped out right away to a number of you. Pat of St. Paul wanted to know: "How did Ricky Elmore get pushed to the sixth round with his fantastic production in college? Do you think this was a steal for the Packers?"

Andy of Anew Berlin, Wis., wrote: "I was wondering why everyone was so high on Reed and why have I never heard of Ricky Elmore until the Packers drafted him. I listen to a lot of sports talk radio and I haven't heard anyone bring up the comparison of Reed to Elmore and I am interested in what your opinion was for the vast differences in where they were drafted especially because of the numbers they put up at Arizona."

Actually, Pete Dougherty of the Green Bay Press-Gazette broached the subject shortly after the draft. But I think the question brings a classic draft argument into specific relief: How should college production be weighed versus athleticism and potential? When should production matter and when shouldn't it?

First, let's review a series of test results that absolutely swayed NFL scouts and their respective general managers.

Reed ran the fourth-fastest time in the 40-yard dash (4.68 seconds) among defensive linemen at the February scouting combine. He covered the first 10 yards in 1.54 seconds, tops among defensive linemen and an important tool for scouts to evaluate initial burst from pass-rushers.

Although he weighed in at eight pounds less than Reed (255 pounds versus 263), Elmore tested substantially worse in speed drills. He ran the 40-yard dash in 4.96 seconds and his 10-yard split was 1.70 seconds. Elmore subsequently improved those times during private workouts, but the die was cast: Elmore was slow for a projected 3-4 linebacker.

You might scoff at those numbers. It's true, the NFL is populated by hundreds of successful players once deemed too slow. It's also littered with the remains of those who are fast but can't play the game. But in the world of scouting, which includes equal parts evaluation and projection, speed is one of the most important attributes of a potential draft pick at most positions.

I reached out to Steve Muench of Scouts Inc., whose job is to mirror the work of NFL scouts, making his own evaluations while also trying to project what the league will think of prospects. Steve's evaluation will help you understand why Elmore was still on the board 155 spots after the Texans selected Reed:

"Elmore was the more productive player the past two years but production can be, and in this case is, misleading. Reed recorded the quickest 10-yard split out of all the defensive linemen at the combine last year. He is substantially faster than Elmore, and he is eight pounds heavier despite measuring two inches shorter. He also has longer arms and superior upper-body strength.

None of this would matter much if it didn't translate to the film. But Reed is quicker off the line and closes better than Elmore, who benefited from the attention that Reed drew from opposing teams. Reed is noticeably stouter against the run."


Elmore was one of the first to recognize how the NFL was viewing him, going to the very 2011 lengths of posting YouTube videos depicting him jumping out of a pool and later into a truck.

"I was just trying to show that I'm athletic and I'm explosive," Elmore told Wisconsin reporters. "... It's the difference between a sack and not getting a sack. If you can't be explosive off the line, an offensive tackle is going to beat you back and you're already one step behind. ... Being explosive is probably the No. 1 most important thing to being an outside linebacker."

PACKERS RUSH DEFENSE BY DIRECTION

The Packers allowed 3.7 yards per rush up the middle, 12th best in the league in 2010. However, when teams ran to the left or right, the Packers allowed 5.5 yards per rush, 29th in the league.
Middle Left/Right
Rushes 173 219
Yards/Rush 3.7 5.5
First Downs 27 55
Source: ESPN Stats & Information
Elmore also spent five weeks working with the father of Packers outside linebacker Clay Matthews to help make the transition to linebacker. It's been well-chronicled that the Packers don't have a starter locked in opposite Matthews, and as the chart shows, the Packers could stand to shore up their outside run defense in 2011.

But can Elmore be the answer? Did the Packers unearth a player who simply knows how to get to the quarterback and play the game? Or is Elmore too slow, and were his college production numbers too skewed to consider that outcome a realistic possibility?

From a scouts' perspective, Muench said that Elmore has the "size and toughness to be an effective run-stopper" but needs technique work. Ultimately, Muench concluded: "Elmore has enough quickness and the motor to develop into an effective role player in Green Bay's 3-4 scheme. However, I don't think he has enough speed or agility to develop into a difference-maker like Clay Matthews and he may not even develop into a quality starter."

That's a scout's take, and it clearly mirrors those in the league considering Elmore was still available late in the sixth round. Now you have a better idea of why Reed was more highly regarded. What we don't and can't know is this: Can the Packers develop Elmore into a player who could one day approach his college production? Coaching, heart and circumstances can't be judged before a draft. Check back in three years on that one.

"ESPN" wrote:


“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
[youtube]eEqNJAwQolU[/youtube]
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
It's all about pad level. They didn't even mention it.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
13 years ago
Dude was slow in the 40, which means he shouldn't be on the punt coverage unit. His quickness and agility drills were in the top 2-3 iirc. They also said Dez Bishop was too slow.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago
If playing opposite Reed got Elmore 21.5 sack in two years, what will playing opposite Matthews do for him?

I watched the highlight films of Elmore and Reed. Not to compare them but to get a look at what the other guy was doing while the guy who's video it was was getting the highlight.

Elmore jumped out like a tasmanian devil. He was splitting double teams, stuffing the run, pursuing plays across the field from the opposite side and being the first one there. Against the run and the pass rush.

He may not be fast in shorts and a t-shirt, but he had great anticipation and explosion. He had non stop and violent energy. I am not surprised Thompson liked him over Reed.

The highlights also showed him dropping into coverage a few times.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Greg C.
13 years ago
Let's hope this is a case of scouts getting too caught up on the workout numbers. It does happen sometimes. But then there are guys like Abdul Hodge who were productive in college and not projected to be great in the pros, and the scouts turn out to be right.

Dexter makes a good point about Elmore playing opposite Matthews. If nothing else, Elmore has thrived on being the #2 pass rusher.
blank
warhawk
13 years ago
I think Reed is a much bigger risk when you consider his numbers didn't add up when you look at his size, strength, and speed. Something isn't right there. Especially when you consider the guy on the other side of him was no slouch.

To me a 40 time doesn't mean much when you consider at this position there will be body's between you and the QB and the question is how fast do you shed them and get to the guy throwing the ball.

I don't think the kid will start this year. I see the other guys getting a lot of PT last year improving in year two, or, hope to see that. So the coaches can work with Elmore and move him along over time. When you take a player high in the 2nd round there is more expected sooner and I really wonder if Reed will produce. It's certainly not just speed that makes CM3 special. It's that dip and other moves to get around those OT's fast that gets the numbers he puts up.
"The train is leaving the station."
Yerko
13 years ago
I agree with Dexter on watching his highlight films. Elmore splits a lot of double teams from a tight end/tackle block (something he would see at an OLB and the other thing that impressed me is he was always moving towards the ball. His numbers may have benefited from Reed, but not all credit should be given to that.
The other thing about Elmore that stands out is he is 6'5" 260 pounds...thats a big ass dude right there playing OLB.
DeMarcus Ware: 6'4" 262...just saying.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (9h) : Golden
beast (10h) : I want DT Derrick Harmon, Oregon
Mucky Tundra (11h) : And I can't be looking at my phone
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Hey I'm at work lol
Zero2Cool (12h) : btw, new site chat won't delete auto like
Zero2Cool (12h) : because everyone left like wimps
TheKanataThrilla (12h) : I am wondering if there is some type of autoclear when there isn't activity after a certain amount of time.
Mucky Tundra (13h) : What happened in the chat? Me and Zero posted a few things earlier and they're all gone
dfosterf (13h) : 10-15 min bs plus flyover
dfosterf (13h) : Yes
Zero2Cool (13h) : 7pm is when this kicks off????
buckeyepackfan (13h) : I told him. IT'S VONTE MACK , no matter what!
buckeyepackfan (13h) : He asked me who I thought The Browns were taking.
buckeyepackfan (13h) : 2. Would of had to wear Browns gear all week. NOPE I'll watch from my living room.
buckeyepackfan (13h) : He wanted to know if I would go. 2 things, would have had to fly from Detroit to Green Bay. Nope
buckeyepackfan (13h) : All expense paid trip to the draft. He will be in the Browns section. I told him to say hi to J-10VE for me 😃😃i
buckeyepackfan (14h) : For a call from my nephew, he won an sllexp
TheKanataThrilla (21h) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
TheKanataThrilla (21h) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
Zero2Cool (22h) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Excellent Source: The Bears have a deal in place to move up to 5 if Jeanty is there.
Zero2Cool (23h) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick
dfosterf (24-Apr) : But it is still not tonight. Lol
wpr (24-Apr) : Today is finally here.
dfosterf (24-Apr) : I should have put it in quotes
dfosterf (24-Apr) : It is the title of a you tube video.
dfosterf (24-Apr) : I'm not assuming anything
beast (24-Apr) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?
dfosterf (23-Apr) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (23-Apr) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (23-Apr) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (23-Apr) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (23-Apr) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.