zombieslayer
13 years ago
Rodgers had a better performance. That's not what we're arguing.

My argument is you and NSD are completely discounting Favre's performance.

0 mistakes. No INTs. No fumbles. Sacks because let's face it, that OL was below average. That may piss off a few people saying it but facts are facts. Our OL that year was below average. Bennett/Levens fought for every yard they got rushing and Favre took a lot of hits he shouldn't have taken that year. Be glad we had the toughest QB there ever was.

On the plus side, like Porky said, don't discount how important perfect placement is in a "catch and run" pass. You have to hit your WRs perfectly to set up YAC. Favre was great at it. So was Aaron.

And I'm not at all discounting our D. Like I said - #1 D. It played like a #1 D in that game.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Greg C.
13 years ago
Packers Home Instruction Kit

With these simple steps, you can tilt the stats in your favor:

If you don't like a QB: Take away his receivers' YAC
If you don't like a RB: Take away his longest run
If you don't like a pass rusher: Take away sacks he got against "bad" O-linemen
blank
macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Packers Home Instruction Kit

With these simple steps, you can tilt the stats in your favor:

If you don't like a QB: Take away his receivers' YAC
If you don't like a RB: Take away his longest run
If you don't like a pass rusher: Take away sacks he got against "bad" O-linemen

"Greg C." wrote:



Reminds me of a Tshirt I own:

If all else fails, manipulate the data...
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

If you don't like a QB: Take away his receivers' YAC

"Greg C." wrote:



For the record, I have done nothing of the sort. I have stated one undeniable fact: Brett Favre was not a factor in the second half of Super Bowl XXXI. I have not seen anyone put forth any sort of credible refutation to that statement.
UserPostedImage
porky88
13 years ago

Rodgers had a better performance. That's not what we're arguing.

My argument is you and NSD are completely discounting Favre's performance.

0 mistakes. No INTs. No fumbles. Sacks because let's face it, that OL was below average. That may piss off a few people saying it but facts are facts. Our OL that year was below average. Bennett/Levens fought for every yard they got rushing and Favre took a lot of hits he shouldn't have taken that year. Be glad we had the toughest QB there ever was.

On the plus side, like Porky said, don't discount how important perfect placement is in a "catch and run" pass. You have to hit your WRs perfectly to set up YAC. Favre was great at it. So was Aaron.

And I'm not at all discounting our D. Like I said - #1 D. It played like a #1 D in that game.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



To add a little to what you said...

Why does one game take away from the mid 90s Brett Favre all of a sudden? He still played well in the Super Bowl. I agree that he did not play as well as Rodgers did in Super Bowl XLV, but if you compare the seasons of the two, Favre had a better year no question. That isnt discounting what Rodgers did in 2010. People have simply forgotten just how good Brett Favre was during a five-season run in the 90s. For the record, part of that is Favres own fault.

Nonetheless, that span was unbelievable.

I would go as far to say that the 96 Packers were among the best Super Bowl teams ever assembled. I would place them in the top 15. Favre was one of the three key variables of that team along with special teams and defense. Id also factor in that we saw better quality football in the 90s than in the 2000s, which means the 96 Packers played against better opposing players.

As I said earlier in the thread, the 96 Packers were the peak of that specific era in Packer history. If the 2010 Packers are the peak of this current era, then Packer football will have underachieved in the next few seasons.

If we want to make comparisons, lets do them in a year or two when this current crop of Packers have peaked themselves. Then the real debate can begin.
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago
Because they said Favre in the '96 super bowl was as good as Rodgers in the '10 super bowl.

Which is wrong.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago

Packers Home Instruction Kit

With these simple steps, you can tilt the stats in your favor:

If you don't like a QB: Take away his receivers' YAC
If you don't like a RB: Take away his longest run
If you don't like a pass rusher: Take away sacks he got against "bad" O-linemen

"Greg C." wrote:



It isn't just the YAC. It is the incompletions, dropped int and low production.

The ineffectiveness for more than half the game.

35 minutes, 33 yards. With YAC.

2 yards to the WRs, again with YAC.

Scores set up by great field position because of 4 picks and more yards in returns than passing.

Saying Favre was as good in the Super Bowl as Rodgers is giving Favre more credit than he deserves.

A lot more.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
vegOmatic
13 years ago
1996 team had skill/talent. 2010 team was cerebral.

Proof you can get the job done with either brains or brawn.
blank
porky88
13 years ago

Saying Favre was as good in the Super Bowl as Rodgers is giving Favre more credit than he deserves.

A lot more.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



I read much of this thread up and down and I don't think anyone is saying that. In case I am misunderstood, Rodgers had the better Super Bowl performance, but Favre had the better overall season. I think that is pretty clear.
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago
Would anyone want the ball in Favres hands when it is score or go home a loser?

I wouldn't.

But I would want it in Rodgers hands.

When it is in the regular season, Favre is loose and care free. When the chips are down, he chokes. I would rather have a QB that gets better in the critical situation like Starr or Rodgers than a guy who's rating goes down when you need him most.

In the regular season, Favre's rating falls in the last 2 minutes when protecting a lead or trying to come back from a one score or less deficit. His rating also falls during the playoffs.

I would not call that a push for comparing super bowl contenders. I would take the better playoff QB over the better regular season QB every time. There is a lot more room for error in the regular season. There is none in the playoffs. If you choke you are done. Rodgers wins that one easily.

Favre had a 95.8 rating and Rodgers had a 101.2 rating. Actually, Rodgers had a better regular season. Favre lacked the accuracy Rodgers had.

I also think Rodgers would have had a 105 or better rating without the excessive drops by Driver, Jones and Nelson. I think there were probably 5-8 TDs that were 20+ yard passes that were perfect strikes and flat out dropped. Every QB has passes dropped, but 6-7% by those 3 WRs is a bit excessive. Rodgers already had 65.7% completions. An extra 2-3% would have been pretty remarkable.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (8h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (9h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23h) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23h) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
22-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.